If New York wants an expensive but productive point guard on the wrong side of 30, how about the Rockets’ Russell Westbrook?
Apparently, he’s also an option.
I continue to hear the Knicks are open to taking on a big contract like a Westbrook or a Chris Paul.
The Knicks might want to accelerate their ascent (their normal, and normally foolish, strategy). They have the draft picks and young players to trade for good veterans. By targeting older and more-expensive players, New York can get better players while surrendering fewer assets.
Like Paul, Westbrook – who turns 32 next month and is due $132,932,520 over the next three seasons – fits the profile.
But the big difference between Paul and Westbrook: Oklahoma City appears ready to rebuild, and Houston is trying to contend for a championship around James Harden.
The Knicks’ young players and future draft picks probably won’t help the Rockets win during Harden’s remaining prime nearly as much as Westbrook could. Perhaps, there’s a multi-team trade to be made where New York gets Westbrook, another team gets the Knicks’ assets and that third team sends helpful veterans to Houston. But multi-team trade ideas get complicated – and therefore unlikely – quickly.
The simplest expectation: Houston remains in title pursuit, which means not trading Westbrook for young players, picks or future salary-cap flexibility. (There’s a narrow possibility the Rockets could justify unloading Westbrook to sign someone else with newly created cap space this offseason, especially considering assets from the Knicks could be flipped.)
Westbrook was far from a perfect fit in Houston last season. But he played better once the Rockets went to micro-ball and made him their de facto offensive center. Maybe next season he won’t get coronavirus and injure his quad.
Houston might regret holding onto Westbrook rather than dumping him now. His contract could get ugly.
But that’s just a risk of short-term championship contention.