Early in his tenure as Bulls coach, Fred Hoiberg had problems with Jimmy Butler and Joakim Noah. But Butler and Noah were stubborn veterans entrenched in their ways. The thinking was Hoiberg would connect better with less-proven, more-impressionable players.
Yet, it seems Hoiberg – whom Chicago fired this week – had interpersonal problems with this younger roster, too.
Multiple league sources said Hoiberg had lost the team, saying players no longer believed in his system and became increasingly emboldened in undermining Hoiberg’s authority.
what could Zach LaVine pull?
The answer is anything he wanted, according to a team source who said LaVine was given carte blanche by Hoiberg. Internally, there was concern players would revolt more as the season marched on
Did Hoiberg have control of the locker room? Lauri Markkanen‘s response seems telling.
Rick Tarsitano of WGN
There is no one right temperament for coaching in the NBA. Coaches have succeeded and failed with varying styles.
But it seems Hoiberg never found his footing. By most accounts, he’s a nice guy. But it also seemed he tried too hard to bend his personality to what he thought an NBA coach should be – and that came across as fake.
His biggest issue: He didn’t win. Players want coaches who help them flourish on the court (which comes with more money, etc.). Hoiberg never demonstrated he could be that coach.
Add his mild-mannered nature, and it was hard for him to command respect.