If you’re one of those people (and I’m in this group) who isn’t sold the triangle offense as Phil Jackson likes to run it can win titles the way the NBA is evolving, he has a question for you (us):
The rings argument is Jackson’s ultimate trump card — and he’s playing it because the Knicks are not moving away from the triangle. It’s staying, it’s going to influence their coaching search, and he would like to cut off criticism. Here are Jackson’s comments from Thursday, via Stefan Bondy of the New York Daily News.
“That’s what I was brought here for to do — build a system. That’s all part in package of what we’re doing.”
How that ties into the coaching search is you need to be one of Jackson’s guys.
“Only people I probably know will be in the interview process. I will reach out to make connections to some people. But I’ve been in this position, in the NBA over 50 years, and I’ve seen a lot of situations where coaches end up coming in without simpatico with the general manager and those things don’t work well,” he said. “So someone who has compatibility with what I do as a leader would have to be in sync with what we do.
“A lot of your speculations that people have thrown out really have very little bearing on what we do. If you want to save either paper space or speculation, limit your speculations, that’ll help out a lot.”
Kurt Rambis is still the guy Jackson wants, he feels they can work together. Jackson’s criteria means if you were dreaming of Tom Thibodeau, Scott Brooks, or Mark Jackson you can move along, it’s not happening. It does mean maybe Brian Shaw gets an interview. Jackson likely calls Luke Walton, but people around the Warriors don’t seem terribly concerned he’d go to a place he has to run the triangle.
Anthony said he voiced his opinion to Phil Jackson during his exit interview Thursday – leaving “no stones unturned”… Anthony said he wants an extensive process open “to whoever would come in here and make this a better situation.”
Anthony seemed to hint if there were not a greater effort to win now, he’d consider waiving his no-trade clause to go to a contender. But that’s down the road.
Jackson is right, having a system matters — more for the role players than the stars. In Jackson’s case, the triangle didn’t make Jordan/Pippen/Kobe/Shaq great; they would have thrived regardless of the system. It mattered for guys like Paxson/Longley/Fox/Fisher far more. It matters to have a system that gets everyone on the same page and where the players fit and buy in, but a lot of systems have done that and won rings.
What the Knicks need is talent — on the court and as a coach. The best guys they can get. Talent wins in the NBA. I’m more of a fan of fitting the system to the players, especially your elite ones. Jackson is going the other way. The question becomes can he get the talent that way he needs to make the Knicks a threat? Or even a playoff team?