The list of players who will miss the start of training camp is significant, everyone from Chris Paul to Al Harrington to possibly Dwyane Wade. Each, though, could be back for the start of the regular season.
Which either means the offseason is too short or camp is too long.
Yet here we are, on the verge of the NBA’s first full training camp in two years, left to wonder whether there might be a happy medium between the one-week camp the lockout produced last December and the four weeks we’re about to embark upon.
For as much as coaches are embracing a return to the previous normalcy, what they truly embrace is the time spent in the gym, at practice, not the nonsense masquerading as exhibition play.
Because it is the exhibitions, and all that goes with them, that get in the way.
Take the Mavericks. They will open camp Saturday in Dallas but then leave the following Wednesday for Europe, where they will play a pair of exhibitions. It hardly allows for much in the way of continuity, although it could mean a couple of home-cooked meals for Dirk.
To a degree, the NBA got it right last year with a home-and-home pair of exhibitions against a geographically close rival. For most veterans, especially those about to embark on an 82-game marathon, two is about right, although some might want one or two more.
But just as the NFL’s preseason is twice as long as it needs to be with football’s four exhibitions, the NBA’s maximum of eight also is excessive.
Remove the travel to the Dakotas, other hinterlands and those college campuses, and there would be more time for the actual work of becoming a team honed for the regular season.
Of course, that also wouldn’t generate as much preseason revenue, revenue that solely goes to the owners, with paychecks not starting for most players until the regular season.
Two weeks of camp/preseason would allow the NBA to get started on better footing, with those feet not as sore when what matters actually begins.