Chris Paul traded to Clippers: The salvation of Blake Griffin

10 Comments

Blake Griffin is going to have it different.

That’s what the Wednesday night trade of Chris Paul to Griffin’s Clippers represents. There’s been a precedent set in this league, where great players have their youths squandered on poor teams, suffering without help. The most notable has been Kevin Garnett, and after him, LeBron James, whose departure from Cleveland can be clearly linked to Garnett’s departure from Minnesota. Griffin has avoided that fate. There’s risk with Chris Paul with his knee, risk with Chris Paul because of his opt-out for 2012-2013 (which he’s agreed to opt-in for right now, reportedly), and risk with his free agency in two years in 2013. But the fact remains that Blake Griffin will play with one of the top five best players in the NBA, the best player at his position. (Derrick Rose isn’t a point guard. He’s a Derrick Rose.)

The impact of this cannot be overstated. How often are the primes of players wasted? Should Griffin (missed his rookie season with knee injury) and Paul (missed most of season two years ago and has an issue with his meniscus in one knee) stay healthy, this is a team-up that can stay together for ten years. That’s ten years where Griffin can grow into the best version of himself beside a player that can make him the best he possibly can be. That’s exceptionally rare. For comparison, here are the point guards various stars played with in their second seasons:

Carmelo Anthony: Andre Miller -Good pro, but not a star.

LeBron James: Jeff McInnis – Yeah.

Kevin Garnett: Shane Heal – Uh-huh.

Amar’e Stoudemire: Howard Eisley (OK, so he wound up with Steve Nash. And look what happened.)

And yes, it’s actually his third year in the league after his injury but the point remains the same. Most players toil in vain. And maybe it’s a market scenario. But this is the Clippers. Someone who plays for the Clippers has had something go right (super-double-jinx with a cherry on top). And the big winner is fans. They get to see Griffin with a real chance to make he most of his career from the start.

As a point of reference, the Clippers last year were 23rd in the league in points-per-possession in the pick-and-roll. The Hornets were 16th. And this is with David West out for several months and not being a roll-man, Emeka Okafor who isn’t a great roll-man, and Jason Smith, who isn’t anything.

Defense is where the impact will get lost. But Griffin’s not going to have to cover as much on the perimeter pick and roll defense, he can stick his man. Paul gets hung up on screens because of his size, but he also fights through them and can contain. Paul’s a ballhawk, which will increase Griffin’s break-out transition opportunities.

That’s the key here, and what will get lost with the trade of Eric Gordon. Gordon was never going to make Griffin everything he can be. Paul can. Gordon was never going to actually help Griffin score outside of being a diversion. Paul will create opportunities for him. Griffin gets to play with a top player, in his prime, and if they win at all, Paul will re-sign and he’ll have a title shot every year. That’s so rare in a league that’s defined by the fruitless pursuit of greatness by young players having to pay their dues on mediocre squads wasted by short-sighted or short-changed GMs. Paul saw it, with a team that was constructed well but couldn’t be held together falling apart after a run in 2008. But Griffin won’t know of it. He’ll just know what it’s like to play with the best pure point guard in the league.

Griffin has been special since the moment he stepped on the floor. He changed the landscape last year. But this? This unearths his true potential. Griffin may become great before any of us are really ready.

Report: Rockets exiled Anthony rather than just dropping him from rotation ‘because his name was Carmelo’

Nathaniel S. Butler/NBAE via Getty Images
1 Comment

Why isn’t Carmelo Anthony in the NBA?

That’s the question everyone obsesses over, but the answer is quite simple: He’s washed up. Anthony played poorly for the Thunder then even worse for the Rockets. He’s now 35. Occasionally, washed-up players still land on NBA rosters, but they usually don’t. It’s not worth fretting over the common outcome happening.

The question that really intrigues me about the latter stages of Anthony’s career:

How did Houston go from giving Anthony a major role to deciding he suddenly couldn’t be with the team at all?

Baxter Holmes of ESPN:

Still, the Rockets know they can’t just take him out of the rotation; doing so would cause a media firestorm. “Because his name was Carmelo, we treated it differently,” one team source says.

The Rockets hope that parting ways with Anthony quickly might allow him to join another team.

This is a strange explanation.

What made a “media firestorm” so inevitable? Even if it were inevitable, what made a “media firestorm” so difficult to deal with? The Rockets couldn’t handle a few questions about Anthony?

If Anthony protested about a reduced role, that would’ve been one thing. But by all accounts, he did what Houston asked of him while there. He didn’t even get a chance to show whether he could’ve helped as a non-rotation player.

The Rockets gave him 20-39 minutes in each of his games with them. If he deserved that much playing time, he couldn’t have helped at all in situational spot minutes? Maybe Anthony’s awful defense would have been at least tolerable if he could’ve conserved his energy for smaller bursts on the court.

If Houston tried to do him a favor, it failed. Anthony never landed with another team. His abrupt and confusing end with the Rockets certainly didn’t instill confidence around the league.

Anthony has expressed resentment for how Houston exiled him. He deserves some blame for the predicament. His prior objections about coming off the bench in Oklahoma City contributed to everyone being on pins and needles about his role.

But it remains strange the Rockets handled the situation in such an extreme manner.

Report: Lakers player lost $1 million endorsement deal in China

Scott Varley/MediaNews Group/Torrance Daily Breeze via Getty Images
3 Comments

LeBron James publicly criticized Daryl Morey and reportedly pressed NBA commissioner Adam Silver on punishing the Rockets general manager.

Why is LeBron so upset with Morey, who merely tweeted support for Hong Kong protesters trying to expand and maintain their freedom?

Following the money often provides an answer.

Due to Chinese backlash, the NBA will reportedly lose millions of dollars of expected revenue, which affects players’ salaries. Lakers players also felt even-more-direct consequences while in China for preseason games.

Dave McMenamin of ESPN:

James, Anthony Davis, Kyle Kuzma and Rajon Rondo — to name a few — had appearances canceled. One Lakers player, sources told ESPN, had agreed to a $1 million endorsement deal with a Chinese company prior to the trip. When he arrived — poof — it was gone. A seven-figure payday went out the window.

It’s understandable someone would be agitated by losing a $1 million endorsement deal because of someone else’s tweet. I can’t even imagine how frustrating it’d be to miss out on that money.

Morey chose to take a political stand. Others are paying the price. He definitely rankled people around the league.

But perhaps scorn for Morey is misdirected.

This is the peril of chasing money in a place where an endorsement deal can fall apart because of someone else’s tweet. Maybe a bigger problem is a business environment where free expression is so stifled.

Report: Kings offer four-year, $90M contract extension to Buddy Hield, who wants $110M

Rocky Widner/NBAE via Getty Images
1 Comment

Buddy Hield is making noise about leaving the Kings in free agency next summer if they don’t sign him to a contract extension by Monday’s deadline.

Where do negotiations stand?

Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports:

The Kings have an offer for Hield on the table for four years and $90 million, league sources told Yahoo Sports. Hield and his agent, Brandon Rosenthal, are seeking a number closer to $110 million, sources said.

This will primarily come down to two factors – Sacramento’s willingness to bend and Hield’s appetite for risk.

A four-year, $90 million extension seems quite fair. I bet many players of Hield’s caliber would’ve already accepted it.

But in a weak free-agent class, he has a chance to get much more next summer. He could even draw a max offer sheet, which projected to be worth $125 million over four years (though that was before the NBA began losing China revenue).

Of course, the Kings would have matching rights on Hield, who’d be a restricted free agent without an extension. So, Hield can’t unilaterally leave Sacramento next summer. The Kings also have another good young shooting guard in Bogdan Bogdanovic (who has his own extension offer on the table). These factors all give Sacramento reason not to pay Hield generously now.

If the Kings up their offer, that’d make it easy on Hield. He and Sacramento are trending in the right direction together. A big payday would clearly satisfy him.

If the Kings hold firm at less than Hield’s desired $110 million, he faces a choice: How much risk is he willing to incur to bet on himself?

With those numbers so close, perhaps there’s room for compromise. In addition to salary, guarantees, incentives and options could help bridge the gap. But evident by the lack of a signed extension, a significant divide clearly remains.

Report: LeBron James pressed Adam Silver on Daryl Morey repercussions, perceived double standard for players

Zhong Zhi/Getty Images
5 Comments

Lakers and Nets players – who were meeting with Adam Silver in China – reportedly told the NBA commissioner they would’ve been punished for a tweet as costly as Daryl Morey’s and asked Silver what he’d do to Morey. LeBron James reportedly spoke up in that meeting. LeBron also later criticized Morey.

It wasn’t difficult to connect the dots.

But in case you wanted confirmation LeBron was among the players questioning Silver on Morey…

Dave McMenamin of ESPN:

Silver opened the floor. James raised his hand.

His question was related to Morey — and the commissioner’s handling of the Rockets’ GM. James, to paraphrase, told Silver that he knew that if a player caused the same type of uproar with something he said or tweeted, the player wouldn’t be able to skate on it. There would be some type of repercussion. So, James wanted to know, what was Silver going to do about it in Morey’s case?

Silver pushed back, reminding the players that the league never doled out discipline when they publicly criticized President Donald Trump. Morey was exercising the same liberty when he challenged China. Regardless of the financial fallout of one versus the other, that’s not what should matter. Silver might have disliked the ramifications of Morey’s tweet, but he would defend the right to say it.

We can’t know what would’ve happened if a player tweeted like Morey. But Silver is right: The NBA has a track record of allowing players – including LeBron – to speak unchecked on social issues. I think a player would’ve gotten the same treatment as Morey. Still, as the WNBA showed, there might be limits for players’ freedom of expression.

This line of questioning also reveals something about LeBron. There are many possible responses to this situation. Seemingly suggesting Morey – who supported Hong Kong protesters, who are trying to maintain and expand their freedoms – deserved punishment is, um, one way to go.