Agents are leading the charge against the latest offer from the NBA owners — agents are at the heart of decertification efforts, they are telling their clients not to take this deal.
Agents are in one sense looking out for their clients’ interest, although everything is intertwined — the more money the players make, the more money they make. To be fair, most agents are concerned about the well being of their clients beyond just the financial, but the financial is the cornerstone.
However, this fight is not about money as much as power. In the wake of what LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony did last season, the owners felt like they were losing power. They are using this Collective Bargaining Agreement to get it back.
“The agents represent a threat to the control of the owner and the team,” said Termini, who has represented many of the top players from Ohio, including Jim Jackson, Brad Sellers, Earl Boykins and Kosta Koufos. “They want to just deal with the player. They’re going to tell him what to do, where to go, when he’s hurt, when he’s not hurt, what doctor to go to, what’s a good deal, what’s a bad deal, when he’s traded, what time to report.
“The agent gets involved in all of those decisions on behalf of the player and it’s burdensome to the team. They don’t like it. They’d like to eliminate that. So in these negotiations, as the options for the players become fewer and fewer, it has the hand-in-glove effect of reducing the role of the agent.”
Clearly that’s an agent’s spin, but the sentiment is correct. The owners and league would love to diminish the role of agents and this deal helps do that by reducing the trade options an agent could pursue for a client.
Just remember that this CBA negotiation is pretty much like everything that happens in Washington D.C. — it’s about money and power. It gets spun as being good for the people (or the fans), but it’s always about money and power.