The basic team building model in the NBA has been pretty easy to understand — you’re either a contending team or building to get there, and if you’re a contending team whose championship window has closed you blow it up and start over with young players. It takes a few years (maybe more than a few) but you rebuild.
The Phoenix Suns are not contenders. But they are not blowing it up and trading away Steve Nash, either.
From a business perspective, however, there is no debate. Trading Nash would be disastrous. This isn’t Green Bay, Pittsburgh or Boston. Irrelevance here is a death sentence.
“Phoenix can be a tough market,” (Suns President Rick) Welts said….
Welts said that (team GM Lon) Babby, in his first year with the franchise, was amazed by the negative reaction to the Suns’ 40-42 record this past season.
“For a lot of markets that’s a really successful team,” Welts said. “But the success we’ve had comes with higher standards in terms of people’s expectations. There’s more anxiety when the team isn’t solidly winning more than half of its games. Does it factor in for us? It does. Historically we’ve never torn down this team to build it back up again. Some people will say that’s the reason we’ve never won a championship.”
Suns officials ran the numbers and it showed that when a team blew up its core after reaching the conference finals it took about a decade to get back. (Over at The Point Forward, Zach Lowe took a longer look at that.) That is a long down time in a market where most of the people are transplants with loyalty to a team from back home. They’ll come watch the Suns if the Suns are good, but when they are bad they stay away. The Suns can’t afford that.
All of which is to say, you think it would be the right thing for the Suns to trade Nash, to do so now and get young players and picks to start rebuilding. But the Suns don’t see it that way at all.
Of course, their other risk is that Nash just walks away after his contract is up in the summer of 2012 and they get nothing. But don’t look for them to trade him soon, it would be bad business.
Lonzo Ball bypasses open layup for no-look backward bounce pass, leaves Luke Walton staring into abyss (video)
Lonzo Ball missed a layup early last night. That might have made him overthink later, when he was ahead of the pack on another fastbreak. Instead of shooting the open layup, Ball bounced the ball behind him without looking, leading to a turnover and open Heat 3-pointer.
On the bright side for the Lakers, they still beat Miami.
On the bright side for us, we got this great Luke Walton reaction GIF:
LeBron James says he was referring to only arena, not consideration of signing with Knicks
LeBron James said in reference to his "here or the Garden" comment that no other venue could have held this final duel between LeBron and Wade other than those two venues. (Not that he was thinking of signing with the #Knicks)
This was always the most likely explanation. The arenas in Los Angeles in New York are the NBA’s biggest stages, and LeBron has repeatedly stated his affection for Madison Square Garden. He didn’t have to think through all the implications to say those were the only appropriate locations.
Ultimately, I believe the given explanation that this was just about the arena’s allure and nothing more. An offhand remark needn’t completely follow the logic that either LeBron or Wade must play for the Knicks for them to meet at Madison Square Garden. But I’m not completely sold this wasn’t a passive-aggressive dig at the Knicks.
Kings player after beating Bulls: ‘Uh-oh, another 2 1/2-hour practice for them tomorrow’
Including when Wade thanked LeBron for seeing that their last game was played at Staples Center, one of the legendary venues of the league. But it was LeBron’s response that turned heads:
“It was either here or The Garden. That’s it.”
Did the Knicks actually have a shot at LeBron last summer?
It doesn’t seem that way, considering LeBron made his decision to go to Los Angeles within 24 hours of the official start of free agency. There was no meeting with the Knicks, no serious contact in any way.
What LeBron was referring to (I think) was having their final game in one of the two brightest spotlights, one of the two most legendary venues in the NBA. Madison Square Garden and Staples Center have a vibe before Knicks and Lakers games that just doesn’t exist anywhere else — even when their teams are bad the venues are special and guys raise their games. It’s a combination of the markets, the big fan bases, and the history of the franchises, and the buildings (Shaq and Kobe basically built Staples Center). Much like a baseball game at Yankee Stadium/Fenway Park/Wrigley Field, there’s just something special about it that’s hard to quantify. It’s just different there.
That’s why the final game for LeBron and Wade had to be in Los Angeles or New York.
But Knicks fans, go ahead and dream of what might have been.