It’s just blatant, obvious fact that no member of the Los Angeles Lakers has never committed a foul or ever committed a violation that would result in a turnover. So naturally, we were all as outraged as Andrew Bynum was to find out that not only were the Lakers were called for 20 — twenty! — personal fouls during last night’s game against the Mavericks, but Bynum himself was called twice for traveling violations. Here was Bynum’s reaction to CBS in Los Angeles concerning the biggest atrocity in the history of officiating (via Mark Francescutti of the Dallas Morning News):
“It’s hard to play 8 on 5…When I asked one of the officials, how did you call a
travel? He said, “I didn’t see a travel.” “The guy who called it looked
me in my eyes and said “I didn’t see a travel.”
Then in reference to a foul that he thought should have been called
on Dirk Nowitzki, Bynum says the referee told him, “I didn’t think it
was going to mess your shot up.”
Lets not even pretend for a second that those travels could have been the product of anything less than flawless footwork from Bynum, who is not only wholly dominant but also bearing flawless work ethic. And those 20 fouls? It’s not even possible that they came as a result of some uncharacteristically lazy defense. Not even in the very realm of possibility.
Look, being called for fouls and turnovers…that’s just not Los Angeles Lakers basketball; their power is unmatchable, their grace is undeniable, and their focus and execution on both ends of the court is completely unwavering. If you’ve been to the STAPLES center, you’d know that.
And don’t even give me that “the refs aren’t perfect, they’ll miss calls on both sides” nonsense. This is an institutional conspiracy. David Stern loves LeBron James and obviously wants the Lakers to lose every game. That’s why the Mavs only committed 16 turnovers while the Lakers committed 17.
And that’s why the Lakers were called for 20 fouls while the Mavs were called for 20 fouls. Every referee in the NBA was given the explicit order to make tons of calls against the Lakers, and last night’s game was only the latest piece of evidence to prove it.
A rumor emerged the Knicks could be looking to trade for Wizards point guard John Wall.
That always seemed dubious. Marc Berman of the New York Post cited “Some in the league believe.”
But now comes the counter-leak, anyway…
Ian Begley of ESPN:
This is an overcorrection that only makes the Knicks look worse. Not internally discussing a trade candidate does not inspire confidence. Sound organizations evaluate their options. The Knicks should discuss Wall internally.
They should also likely conclude it’s not worth trading for him.
Wall is due about $171 million over the next four seasons. He’ll be 29 when that super-max contract extension kicks in, and he already looks hurt, lazy and grouchy.
Maybe if the Knicks still had Joakim Noah to trade, it might makes sense, though still probably not. As is, New York doesn’t have enough bad contracts to match Wall’s toxic del.
So, I don’t expect New York – or anyone – to trade for Wall. But I’d be more encouraged by the Knicks if they internally discussed this then passed on Wall. If we’re to believe this latest leak,* who knows what they’ll decide if they ever talk about Wall?
*Which I don’t, for what it’s worth. I suspect even the Knicks at least discussed why trading for Wall was a bad idea.
The Nuggets’ have so many injured backcourt players – Jamal Murray, Gary Harris, Will Barton and Isaiah Thomas (plus forwards Paul Millsap, Michael Porter, Jarred Vanderbilt are also hurt).
Denver is adding a reinforcement – Nick Young.
Young has had a rough go since winning a championship with the Warriors last season. The 33-year-old is probably on his last legs as an NBA player.
But Denver needs someone. Young might still be serviceable. He can make 3-pointers, though he defends like a sieve and doesn’t contribute much else offensively. With the ball running through Nikola Jokic, maybe that will be enough – until better Nuggets get healthy.
Kyrie Irving‘s first public flat-Earth comments came on a light-hearted podcast.
Will Stephen Curry also become notorious for his conspiracy theory, revealed on a light-hearted podcast?
The Warriors star appeared on “Winging It” with Vince Carter, Kent Bazemore and Andre Iguodala. The conversation:
- Curry: “We ever been to the moon?
- Multiple responders: “Nope.”
- Curry: “They’re gonna come get us. I don’t think so, either.”
Podcast co-host Annie Finberg asked whether Curry actually believed that. He responded affirmatively.
Still, Irving immediately doubled down outside the podcast – then tripled down and quadrupled down and… This hasn’t gotten away from Curry in the same way. He could still easily explain he was joking during the podcast.
Or he could stick with his conspiracy theory. I don’t know what he actually believes.
For what it’s worth, I believe we went to the moon. So many people would have to know if the moon landing were faked, and there’s no way they’d all keep it secret.
John Collins brings plenty of excitement to the Hawks, and he was pretty enthused after posting 30 points and 12 rebounds in Atlanta’s 106-98 win over the Nuggets on Saturday.