Tag: NBA twitter

Miami Heat James smiles after making a basket against Charlotte Bobcats during their NBA game in Charlotte

Winderman: League needs to clarify questionable calls for all teams, not just the Heat


By now you’ve read how @NBAOfficial confirmed what was apparent from the moment LeBron James went in six different directions (with six different steps) after giving up his dribble late in the fourth quarter of Wednesday’s overtime loss to the Clippers:

That he traveled before he received a bailout foul call, one that enabled him to hit one of two foul shots and force the game to the extra period.

The outcry was immediate and widespread. And accurate.

It was an unavoidable controversy for the NBA. So the league quickly quieted it by posting, “Yes, LeBron should’ve been called for traveling on this play last night.”

Case closed?

Uh, not quite.

Go ahead, click on @NBAOfficial on Twitter and you’ll notice exactly two posts (as of this posting) through the first three weeks of the NBA season.

The first came in reference to a jump stop by the Heat’s Dwyane Wade on a game-winning shot in Charlotte. The post: “Was Wade’s game winner legal? Yes.”

The account’s second post showed up midday Thursday.

So, apparently, either there have been only two questionable calls this season, or @NBAOfficial is the league’s official watchdog of the Miami Heat.

Here’s the point: Of course Heat games are going to draw a higher degree of scrutiny. They draw a higher degree of interest.

But how can a league scrutinize only what the media, the blogosphere and passionate fans demand be addressed?

If you’re going to reassess calls after the fact, which actually is a darned good idea, then assess ’em all, or at least the ones that require a second look.

But a league can’t create a Twitter account that, apparently, has a sole function of addressing the sole issue of:

Did you see what the Miami Heat got away with last night?!

Sure LeBron walked. He seemed to have three pivot feet on the play, if that is even anatomically possible.

But there also was an issue with James’ late foul on Chauncey Billups while Billups was attempting a 3-pointer.

And question of whether a DeAndre Jordan block should have been a goaltend.

For years, the notion in the NBA has been that superstars are officiated differently. Yet speak privately to referees and they’ll tell you that the remarkable athleticism of those stars often can make what looks like a foul or violation actually into a clean play.

LeBron’s fancy footwork did a number on the officials Wednesday.

The league cleaned that up rather quickly Thursday.

But what about every other questionable call around the league Wednesday?

Where are those addressed?

Or does there have to be an @NBAOfficialForTheRestOfTheLeague?

Ira Winderman writes regularly for NBCSports.com and covers the Heat and the NBA for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. You can follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/IraHeatBeat.

NBA’s new labor twitter account draws fire. It didn’t take long.


Because the league was not winning big enough during the lockout, it decided to take its case to twitter.

The league opened a new account — @NBA_Labor — which the NBA could use to defend the owners case in cyberspace. To right all those perception wrongs. But it didn’t take long before that account came under attack from all quarters.

One attack came from Nazr Mohammed. It started when the Pistons Charlie Villanueva tried to explain on twitter how the owners get to take expenses off the top of the basketball related income (or BRI) pie, so that the proposed 50/50 split is not really that. Mohammed had said something similar. The league’s new account sent this out.


Then the monster NBA official twitter account (with more than 3 million followers) retweeted it. Mohammed was ticked and responded.


By the way, Mohammed is right. The owners do get a cut off the top of the BRI for certain expenses, and they asked to expand those expenses in the new labor deal. That seems to have fallen away, but the owners do get the first cut before money is divided, something the sides agreed to.

The first tweet the NBA’s labor account sent out was to correct ESPN’s Henry Abbott on a post. And it turns out, the league’s twitter was technically right due to new parts of the labor agreement not yet made public. But Abbott asks a few good questions about the account, too, such as are 140 characters enough to explain a nuanced CBA?

My question is this: Does the league need another bully pulpit to make its case? The owners are going to win the lockout. Big. How big is the only question left on the table. Is starting a new twitter account to play watchdog on the PR battle really going to look good and help with that battle on top of it? So far it doesn’t look like it.

NBA players take to Twitter to make their case, call owners greedy


It’s really hard for the NBA players to win the public relations war. I think they are in the right, that the owners are not really negotiating in good faith. But at the end of the day, if the players took the owners deal they’d make more than 99 percent of Americans and that makes them unsympathetic to the general public.

But the players are trying to make their case, taking to Twitter after talks broke down and pushing the “owners are greedy” angle hard.

Like this tweet from Chris Paul:

source:  Then there is this from Dwyane Wade:

source:  Stephen Curry went multiple tweet to explain the players’ position:

source:  source:  Really, right now, real basketball fans are depressed. Their mad at everyone, both sides.

Brian Cardinal feel our pain.