Tag: Doc Rivers

Tom Thibodeau

Doc Rivers says Bulls would be “nuts” to let Tom Thibodeau leave


Tom Thibodeau is old school, hard-driving, a work-a-holic who is in to win now no matter who is on the roster. If Jimmy Butler has to play 60 minutes in a 3OT game, so be it. Wins are what matter.

Those kinds of coaches, even when they have success, can wear on players and an organization. Throw in the complex, often uneasy relationships Thibodeau has with the Bulls front office — he didn’t want to trade Luol Deng — and you get rumors. Like that the Knicks might chase him. Like that he is not long for Chicago. Those kinds of rumors have swirled around the Bulls all season (and Thibodeau has denied them.

Doc Rivers — who had Thibodeau as an assistant in Boston when they won the 2008 NBA Title — said the Bulls would be nuts to let Thibodeau go, and if they did things would fall apart fast, as reported at CSNChicago.com.

“He’s under contract, so yeah, I don’t know why he wouldn’t be. I think it’d be nuts not to have him here. I think he’s one of the best coaches in the league and so if you have that, that’s an asset. And I don’ think any right-minded organization would allow that asset to leave, Rivers told reporters. “Because with all the adversity they’ve had with injuries, if you allow that one to leave things would fall apart, and that’s pretty much a guarantee.”

“I think every year is his best coaching job, honestly. Last year he went through it, the year before,” Rivers said. “Every year people keep expecting them to fall and they don’t, and the guy that’s standing there is Tom Thibodeau. He’s the guy, he’s the difference, he holds them together somehow. They trade Deng and yet they keep winning. The guy that’s standing every day is Tom, and I think it’s impressive what he’s done.”

“He just doesn’t relent. He doesn’t believe that because a guy gets injured, even Rose, that a team should go away. I think he instills that in his players and he has some pretty good players. Noah is the other guy that stands out to me. They have a lot of like-minded players to Thibs. I think it’s all because they’ve been around Tom.”

No doubt Thibodeau can be hard to work with at times — the best guys, the driven guys, almost always are. You think management in Chicago and Los Angeles always loved Phil Jackson? But if the guy is elite at what he does, you put up with more because he’s so good.

That’s Thibodeau. Chicago can’t let him leave. If he did, there would be a mile-long line at the exit of other teams trying to sign him.

Report: Donald Sterling almost blew up Bledsoe trade, Clippers summer

Donald Sterling, Rochelle Sterling

Things are different around the Clippers organization now compared to even five years ago, let alone a decade. It’s not just the winning on the court, there is more professionalism around the entire organization.

But they are still owned by Donald Sterling, the man who is the reason for the decades of futility.

This summer the Clippers had one of the better summers of any team in the league. They got Doc Rivers to come and bring a new attitude, some motion to the offense and a more consistent defensive scheme to the team. With that they got Chris Paul to re-sign to a new five-year deal. They got J.J. Redick and Jared Dudley to be floor-spacing shooters as part of a trade of Eric Bledsoe. They made themselves into serious contenders.

Sterling almost blew the whole summer, reports Adrian Wojnarowski at Yahoo Sports in a stunning but not totally surprising story. It revolved around the three-team trade that sent Bledsoe and Caron Butler to Phoenix for Jared Dudley, with Redick getting a new contract to come to the Clippers (and the Bucks getting picks).

In the early afternoon hours of July 3, owner Donald Sterling called Los Angeles Clippers president Andy Roeser and informed him he had rescinded approval on moving Eric Bledsoe and acquiring free agent J.J. Redick in a sign-and-trade agreement. The three-team deal – delivered the owner’s blessing only two days earlier (and had been announced) – no longer interested Sterling….

What weighed hardest on Rivers, league sources in touch with the Clippers said, was how hard he had recruited Redick, how intensely he had sold him on a different day with this franchise. And now, on Rivers’ first major deal since coming from the Celtics, everything had blown up on him.

Rivers has real power in the organization — getting the Clippers to spend money to cover up the Lakers banners was a sign of this. It had been suggested before but had never come around until Rivers really worked to change the culture. His pedigree, is title ring as a coach and his $7 million contract give him that. Sterling’s move would have blown that whole thing up and it was up to Rivers to change the owner’s mind, according to the report.

For the first few hours, these arguments were slow to register with Sterling, sources told Yahoo Sports. Looking back, only the owner knows why he attempted to blow the deal up. Yes, Sterling had been fond of Bledsoe. He was young, explosive, impactful on the Clippers’ second unit. Some believed too, that Sterling stereotyped Redick and didn’t want to pay $27 million for a bench player.

With Sterling, rational thought and debate aren’t always part of the discussion. Whatever his reasons, everyone else awaited Rivers’ conversations with Sterling. Rivers contract gave him ultimate management authority on deals, and several sources dealing with the Clippers say that Rivers was beyond embarrassed and humiliated. He feared the unraveling of the deal would cost him his credibility and paralyze him in future trade and negotiation talks, sources said.

This could have gotten much more ugly. Remember that while Chris Paul had agreed to his new max deal he couldn’t sign it until the moratorium ended July 11 — and CP3 (and his people) had not been shy about using his free agency as leverage to get what he wanted. He could have threatened to move on.

It never got there. Whatever Rivers said, within three more days everything was back on. The Clippers had a summer that made them contenders.

But you need to remember that as long as Sterling owns the team, there will always be concerns around the league because of a history of incidents just like this.

Now what for Celtics? Maybe Garnett stays and Pierce is traded

Boston Celtics' Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce talk over a play in the fourth quarter against the New York Knicks in Game 5 of their NBA Eastern Conference basketball playoff series in New York

Doc Rivers is going to be coaching the Los Angeles Clippers next season.

Which is strange to imagine, but it’s a reality. So where does that leave Boston — are Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett going to be back next season? Boston is starting its rebuilding process, but how much are they going to do the first year?

In the case of Pierce, the Celtics have until June 30 to make a decision — keep him for one more season at $15 million or buy him out for $5 million. But there is a growing third option: Trade him.

More and more it appears that is the option the Celtics want to take. Adrian Wojnarowski breaks it down t Yahoo Sports.

The Celtics have to make a decision before June 30 if they want to buy out the remaining $15 million on Paul Pierce’s contract for $5 million, but Boston is finding that scenario less and less likely, sources told Yahoo! Sports. There’s been enough trade interest from contending teams who still see the 35-year-old Pierce as a plausible third offensive option, sources said.

We told you the rumor of one deal: Cleveland offered two second round picks. That’s not going to get it done, that’s a lowball offer. But it shows there is interest and for Boston the idea of getting something back for Pierce rather than pay $5 million and get nothing certainly has appeal.

But Celtics GM Danny Ainge isn’t going to send Pierce just anywhere — Pierce would likely have some input where he lands. This is a Celtics legend and he deserves some consideration in the matter. Second, the quality of offers coming back certainly plays a role, also.

Kevin Garnett is not going to Los Angeles as part of the Doc Rivers move, the league said they will veto it (maybe a deal with a third team can be worked out, but that is a long shot).

If Rivers and Pierce are gone and Boston is rebuilding then you would think Garnett would hang up his sneakers. But don’t bet on it, Wojnarowski said.

Garnett has two years, $24.4 million left on his Celtics deal, but there’s a growing belief that he’ll play one more season before retiring and joining his old coach, Flip Saunders, with a ceremonial role in Minnesota ownership, league sources told Y! Sports.

We will see, he could change his mind. Or, a trade offer could come in that Garnett and the Celtics like enough to take (KG has a no trade clause so he would have to sign off on any deal).

But it appears he wants to play one more season, even if the Celtics wouldn’t be a real threat in the East.

Report: Doc Rivers to “no longer pursue” effort to become Clippers coach

Boston Celtics v Houston Rockets

Looks like Doc Rivers will not be coaching the Los Angeles Clippers next season.

The on-again-off-again negotiations between the Clippers and Celtics are off again, and Rivers wants off the roller coaster as Boston officials feel there is no deal to be made, reports Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports.

After talks failed again on Friday, the Boston Celtics’ Doc Rivers will no longer pursue the Los Angeles Clippers’ coaching job, league sources told Yahoo! Sports.

Rivers will make a choice between returning to the Celtics for his 10th season as coach or leaving for television, sources told Yahoo! Sports.

“The deal is completely dead,” a source directly involved in the talks said Friday.

I would paraphrase Miracle Max from “The Princess Bride” here: This deal is “mostly” dead. When the Clippers hire Brian Shaw, Lionel Hollins or Byron Scott as their coach, then I’ll call it dead. This thing has come back more times than Freddy Krueger, I’m not ready to say it fully dead. Especially since the Clippers are not willing to call it dead.

Even if the talks are deceased, I would  caution anyone who thinks this is going to have a big impact on Chris Paul’s decision to stay with the Clippers this summer as a free agent. There is no indication that he will do anything but re-sign with the Clippers — he would have to leave $30 million on the table, leave a 56-win team with the potential to be a contender with a couple moves, and he would have to leave all the opportunities that a major media market provides if he leaves Los Angeles. You think there is a “Cliff Paul” if he’s playing in Atlanta or Dallas? Nobody around the league thinks CP3 is going anywhere.

It also is the Clippers could try to strike a deal to trade just for Garnett, but it is unclear if he would waive his no trade clause for a coach other than Rivers.

The Clippers and Celtics were on the verge of a deal that would have sent Kevin Garnett to the Clippers for DeAndre Jordan then make a second move that would have sent a pick or two to Boston for the rights to sign Rivers once Boston let him out of his contract.

However, David Stern said that the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement does not expressly allow teams to trade players for a coach. While the Celtics and Clippers wanted to split it into two separate deals, nobody was buying that they were separate. So the Clippers latest plan was to work out a compensation deal with picks for Rivers (that is allowed) and then try to figure out a separate Garnett deal in a couple weeks.

But apparently the two sides disagreed on the pick for Rivers — the Celtics wanted a first rounder, the Clippers were only offering a second.

As the Clippers first round picks the next few drafts are likely to be only a few away from the second round anyway, it makes you wonder how serious they really were about getting a deal done?

The Clippers have Shaw, Hollins and Scott on their radar; the decision is owner Donald Sterling’s.

Rivers is scheduled to have a press conference in Boston Monday. It is possible that if Rivers decides he wants to come back to the Celtics — which admittedly seems a real long shot now — that Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce would be back for one more run. But the more likely outcome is the Celtics bring the Big Three era to an end.

Celtics plan Doc Rivers press conference, call it off. What does that mean? Who knows.

Danny Ainge Doc Rivers

At this point, the Celtics might as well invite the Ringling Brothers into this process, because their talks with the Clippers are already a circus.

Here is what we do know:

• The Clippers still want to do a deal with Boston that would pass muster with the league, something where the Clippers send picks in compensation for the rights to sign Doc Rivers right now. Then in a few weeks they would revisit any Kevin Garnett for DeAndre Jordan trade talks. But that would be totally separate. What could possibly give you the idea they are connected?

• The Celtics called a press conference for noon Eastern on Monday where Doc Rivers and GM Danny Ainge were to address the media (and you don’t really do that if the guy is leaving). But then that presser was abruptly called off and re-scheduled for Monday. That buys the Celtics and Clippers 72 more hours to talk, at least.

All that leaves us with is a ton of questions.

Was the Boston press conference a bluff to force the Clippers back to the table? If so, it worked, apparently.

Are the two sides really any closer to a deal?

Is there a deal the two sides could reach that the league would sign off on, or in three weeks or a month would the league squash a Garnett for Jordan trade?

Is there any way Rivers, Garnett and Paul Pierce could still come back to Boston for one more year? Does Rivers even want to come back?

How badly do the Clippers really want to do a deal? There is a theory among some around the league that the Clippers restarted talks because Chris Paul asked them to and they want to keep him happy so he will re-sign, but they don’t really want to give up this much so they are just going through the motions. People around the Clippers don’t buy that, but it’s out there.

This entire situation is a circus.

I will add this — if this doesn’t come together the teams have nobody to blame but themselves. There have been more leaks around this trade than the Titanic. Because of that it’s been in the media as a connected deal — Rivers, Garnett and Pierce to the Clippers for a variety of different packages headed back East — everyone knows what they were trying to do. Including the league office. If the sides had been quiet and the Clippers traded Jordan and a couple picks for Garnett, then a couple of weeks later Doc Rivers was let go and just ended up in Los Angeles, they might have been fine. But by te time everything had been leaked and there were all these discussions, it was obvious it was all linked.

They shot themselves in the foot on this one.