NBA owners were set to approve jersey advertising.
Now, they have.
The NBA Board of Governors approved the sale of jersey sponsorships, beginning with the 2017-18 season, as part of a three-year pilot program. The sponsorship patch will appear on the front left of the game jerseys opposite the Nike logo. Patches will measure approximately 2.5 inches by 2.5 inches and be adjusted to fit the dimensions of each sponsor’s logo.
The NBA’s 30 teams will be responsible for selling their own jersey sponsorships.
“Jersey sponsorships provide deeper engagement with partners looking to build a unique association with our teams and the additional investment will help grow the game in exciting new ways,” said NBA Commissioner Adam Silver. “We’re always thinking about innovative ways the NBA can remain competitive in a global marketplace, and we are excited to see the results of this three-year trial.”
The sponsor patch will not appear on the retail versions of the player jerseys but teams will have the option to sell the jerseys with sponsor patches in their own retail outlets.
There will be an initial backlash, but if advertising on on jerseys during All-Star weekend is any indication, most fans won’t even notice the ads. (Though that should raise questions about their value to sponsors.)
The NBA is a business, and if it thinks this will increase profits, go for it. There’s nothing immoral or unethical about this plan.
Questions remain about whether this will add revenue, but those are the league’s problems. Though I dislike the idea of further advertising creep, this isn’t something I find worth getting worked up over.
A woman filed a police report last month, accusing Grizzlies forward Zach Randolph of strangling her.
one week later, officials say the woman changed her story … and during a police interview on March 31st, and said there WAS an argument but Randolph NEVER touched her.
According to official documents … cops say the woman told officers, “she was upset and decided to file a fabricated police report and ‘just wanted to get his money.'”
The L.A. County District Attorney’s office has tossed the case.
It’s a shame Randolph faced these false accusations. Hopefully, anyone who saw the news of the initial report also sees this development.
Eye test or analytics?
Both, of course.
But more specifically, I believe in turning as much as possible into numbers. Statistics can track much more than people realize, and numbers allow us to assess more information than our brains can handle.
Some would argue you can’t count hustle. I’d say try, and the NBA is.
Zach Lowe of ESPN:
For the first time, the NBA will track a new batch of “hustle stats” in the playoffs and post them online within hours of the end of every game, league officials told ESPN.com.
The league will track how often defenders contest 2- and 3-point shots, deflections by defensive players, charges taken, which players recover loose balls, and so-called “screen assists,” which the league defines as picks that lead directly to a made field goal attempt by a teammate. The “screen assist” category will not include picks that result in a teammate drawing a shooting foul or that free up someone for a shot one or two passes down the chain, officials said.
This is awesome.
Will these numbers perfectly record complex NBA action? Of course not. There will be gray areas, and context will make same numbers misleading.
But smart people will understand that and use the stats for what they are — another piece of information.
Someone expected has great hustle stats (or poor ones)? That’ll confirm your perception.
Someone unexpected has great hustle stats (or poor ones)? Pay a little more attention to him during games to see why.
This should only make fans smarter.
1. Gregg Popovich
2. Terry Stotts
3. Steve Clifford
Yes, Luke Walton/Steve Kerr led the Warriors to a record, but I can only vote for one per NBA rules and Kerr missed too much time for me to give him the award (as with Manu Ginobili for Sixth Man). Popovich had to integrate LaMarcus Aldridge and re-invent the Spurs style for the seeming 743rd time, and they won a franchise record number of games. He’s the best coach in the game and he had one of his best years.
1. Steve Kerr
2. Gregg Popovich
3. Terry Stotts
Ideally, I could give this award to Kerr and Luke Walton as a duo, but league rules won’t allow it. Even though Walton coached the team for their unprecedented start to the year, it was Kerr that established the culture that allowed them to do so well with him out the first chunk of the season, and he was still involved behind the scenes while Walton was the interim coach.
1. Terry Stotts
2. Gregg Popovich
3. Steve Clifford
There was a point I couldn’t imagine leaving Rick Carlisle off this list. Getting the Mavericks – who most, myself included, wrote off when DeAndre Jordan defected – into the playoffs was pure wizardry. But this was a strong coaching season at the top.
Stotts got a whole new group playing well very quickly. As we’ve seen with LeBron James in Miami and then Cleveland, there are usually more setbacks when integrating a star. Popovich made it look seamless with LaMarcus Aldridge. Clifford kept a team full of players on expiring contracts focused, maintaining a high defensive level while reinventing the offense to become more dynamic.
And I didn’t even get to Brad Stevens, who pushed the right buttons on a deep and middle-heavy Celtics.
Not strongly considered: Steve Kerr, who missed half the season. You can’t do more in a half a season than Stotts, Popovich and Clifford did the entire year.
If there’s anyone in the Lakers’ ownership, front office or coaching staff I believe in, it’s Jeanie Buss.
Ken Berger of CBS Sports:
Believe it or not, Byron Scott has what one source described as a “major chance” to stay with the Lakers; Jeanie Buss is said to be pushing for Scott behind the scenes.
This looks bad for the Lakers on the surface. Scott is a poor coach who has failed at offense, defense, player development and chemistry building.
But perhaps, Jeanie knows what she’s doing.
Her brother, Jim, pledged to step down as head of basketball operations if he didn’t turn the Lakers into a contender. By Jeanie’s interpretation, that means at least the second round next season. Keeping Scott could sabotage the Lakers’ chances on the court.
Without Jim, the Lakers could hire Jeanie’s fiancé, Phil Jackson. I don’t know whether I’d want Jackson running my team – despite everything else, he did draft Kristaps Porzingis – but I sure wouldn’t want Jim Buss.
Would I make the front-office exchange if the cost were an additional season of Scott? It’s at least worth considering, though I’d prefer just hiring a better coach.
Jim will probably screw it up, anyway.