Miami Heat v Minnesota Timberwolves

Report: Kevin Love might follow LeBron James’ lead on free agency next summer

41 Comments

The strangest part of the reported Kevin Love trade – Love to the Cavaliers for Andrew Wiggins, Anthony Bennett and a future first-round pick – was this line:

Cleveland is making the deal with Minnesota with a firm agreement Love will opt out of his contract in 2015 and re-sign with the Cavaliers on a five-year, $120 million-plus contract extension, league sources told Yahoo Sports.

Love, based on the projected 2015-16 salary cap, could make only only $108,690,125. But that’s a relatively minor detail. Exact contract terms are difficult to pin down, and the size of a max contract won’t be determined until next July anyway. Either way, Love would get paid a lot of money – certainly the most allowable – if he re-signs next year.

But Love can’t make that agreement binding. The only way the Cavaliers get any assurance on his future is him opting in to the final year of his contract. An extension is not allowed until January and not feasible regardless.

So, despite whatever Love told anyone or whatever Cleveland believes, Love’s contract future is technically unknown. Perhaps practically unknown, too.

Ken Berger of CBS Sports:

If I had to guess, LeBron James will opt out of the final year of his two-year contract, which is set to pay him $21,573,398 in 2015-16. Based on the projected cap, he could re-sign for $22,053,069 that year. It would make sense to do that on another two-year deal with a player option, opt out once again in 2016 and finally sign a long-term contract when the cap could skyrocket.

Here’s the problem with Love following LeBron’s lead: He’s not LeBron.

For one, the difference in 2015-16 max salary between Love opting in ($16,744,219) and opting out ($18,902,630) is slated to be much more significant than with LeBron ($2,158,411 vs. $479,671). If LeBron opts in, will Love really do that, too?

For another, LeBron has much more security – based on his previous contracts, endorsement income and higher level of play – to take short deals and time his big payday. If he gets injured and misses all of next season, teams will still line up to give him a max contract. That isn’t quite the case for Love.

Love would be wise to get his big payday next summer, but like LeBron, he’ll have options. He should do what’s best for him and not worry about following LeBron’s lead.

Sure, he might get stuck on a team without LeBron, but I think that’s a chance worth taking. LeBron has given every indication he’s committed to Northeast Ohio for the long haul. Love should take him at his word. Not only would LeBron have a lot to lose by leaving again, that’s all Love can offer the Cavaliers – his word.

And if LeBron turns his back on Cleveland and Love, at least Love would have about 109 million reasons to get over it.

To avoid trash talk, Steven Adams told Kevin Garnett he didn’t speak English

Kevin Garnett
2 Comments

Kevin Garnett intimidates people. In the machismo-fueled world of professional sports nobody comfortably admits they were intimidated, but in the wake of Garnett announcing his retirement, a number of players stepped forward to say exactly that. And that KG trashed talked them fearlessly.

Oklahoma City’s Steven Adams found a way to avoid that — tell KG he didn’t speak English.

Brilliant.

Adams was lucky, KG had a reputation for going harder at foreign-born players with his trash talk and intimidation. Then again Adams is not the kind of guy prone to be intimidated.

Pistons’ Stan Van Gundy “encouraged” by players speaking out, protesting social issues

CLEVELAND, OH - APRIL 17: Head coach Stan Van Gundy of the Detroit Pistons yells to his players during the first half of the NBA Eastern Conference quarterfinals against the Cleveland Cavaliers at Quicken Loans Arena on April 17, 2016 in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)  *** Local Caption ***Stan Van Gundy
2 Comments

Athletes are injecting themselves into the needed national conversation about race, violence, and policing in this nation. That has taken some very public forms, including LeBron James, Chris Paul, Dwyane Wade and Carmelo Anthony speaking at the ESPYs, and Colin Kaepernick taking a knee during the national anthem and leading others to do so. Some NBA players likely will follow Kaepernick’s lead.

Pistons coach/GM Stan Van Gundy likes seeing players speak out.

A couple of his Detroit players — Reggie Jackson and Marcus Morris — said they backed the 49ers quarterback. Here is what the never shy Van Gundy said about all of it, via Vincent Ellis of the Detroit Free Press.

“I’m encouraged by the fact of what some of those guys stood up and did at the ESPYs and had a conversation,” Van Gundy said. “I’m really proud of the fact that we have guys that not only see the problem, but want to try to do something about it…

“To me, in some ways, (police brutality is) just the most visible to focus on and it goes to deeper inequities in our criminal justice system, our education system so there’s so much to focus on,” Van Gundy said. “I think it’s great that we have players that want to be part of that conversation, and a lot of players that want to go beyond the conversation and be part of the solution.”

Van Gundy has been telling his players part of that solution is to vote.

The players union and NBA sent out a release saying they wanted to work together to create positive change, but details are still vague on what that might be. The only thing we know for sure as we head into the NBA season — with as divided a nation and election as anyone can remember as a backdrop — is that some NBA players are going to try and keep the conversation going.

Sunday is 16th anniversary of greatest dunk ever: Vince Carter over Frederic Weis

2 Comments

It was the last game of the group stage of the 2000 Olympic basketball tournament at the Sydney Olympics, the USA was taking on France, another USA win on its way to another gold medal.

But what we all remember is this one play — Vince Carter dunking over the 7’2″ French center Frederic Weis.

Best. Dunk. Ever.

By anyone.

Weis was never the same.

In an impressive career — two-time All-NBA, eight-time All-Star, hours and hours of crazy highlights — this is always going to be the highlight at the top of the list. So we will use the anniversary of this dunk to look at it one more time.

Hat tip to nitramy at NBA Reddit.

Hornets coach Steve Clifford suggests allowing teams to advance ball in final two minutes without timeout

Steve Clifford
AP Photo/Chuck Burton
Leave a comment

The final minutes of a close NBA game rank among the best moments in sports – which is pretty remarkable, considering frequent stoppages interrupt and impede enjoyment of the game.

Clutch play. Timeout. Clutch play. Timeout. Clutch play. Timeout.

Coaches should probably call fewer timeouts, because drawing up a play also allows the defense to set. But timeouts give the offense the option of advancing the inbound spot into the frontcourt, a key advantage. So, teams will keep calling timeouts.

Unless…

Steve Aschburner of NBA.com:

For Charlotte’s Steve Clifford, the ability in the final two minutes of a game to advance the ball without requiring a timeout to be called could speed up the action. That has been used on a trial basis in the D League and in Summer League, and several coaches felt it worked well.

“The game is at an all-time high in popularity, but a lot of people complain about the last two minutes,” Clifford said. “I think it would add a different dimension but it would also be a good thing in addressing our biggest issue.”

Not that the coaches would be willing to lose any of their timeouts, though. They just wouldn’t save them specifically for that purpose.

I’m here for that.

I’m unsurprised control-seeking coaches want to keep all their timeouts, and reducing those seems unlikely, anyway. The NBA pays its bills through commercial breaks.

Would moving those advertising opportunities earlier in the game pay off? Audiences are probably larger in crunch time, but an action-packed closing stretch could hook fans and grow overall audiences. It’s always a difficult decision to forgo maximizing immediate revenue in pursuit of more later.

But I’m fairly certain fans would appreciate the change, which is at least a starting point in considering it.