Here’s the controversial out-of-bounds play that is going to get Doc Rivers fined (VIDEO)


Let me be up front — the Los Angeles Clippers did not lose because of this play. They were up 13 with four minutes to go, up 7 inside a minute. The Clippers in general and Chris Paul in particular made a series of terrible decisions and plays — such as fouling Russell Westbrook on a three with 6.7 seconds left, sending him to the line to win the game.

But that’s not what people are talking about.

It’s not what Doc Rivers was talking about after the game — he was livid about the play above. He kept screaming at the officials “that’s our ball.” After Westbrook strips Paul near midcourt (another of Paul’s big late game errors) he passes to Reggie Jackson, who attacks the rim and decides to go for the lay-up rather than the lob dunk to Kevin Durant. The Clippers Matt Barnes fouls Jackson, but there is no call. Instead, the referees ruled the ball out off Barnes.

They went to the replay — a replay that clearly shows the ball going out off Jackson — and decided it was inconclusive. Here is the explanation from crew chief referee Tony Brothers:

“When the ball goes out of bounds, the ball was awarded to Oklahoma City. We got review the play. We saw two replays. The two replays we saw were from the overhead camera showing down, and one from under the basket showing the same angle but from a different view. And from these two replays, it was inconclusive as to who the ball went out of bounds off of. When it’s inconclusive we have to go with the call on the floor.”

Rivers was infuriated in his post-game press conference, saying what is the point of having replay if you’re not going to use it properly.

“That is a game defining and possibly a series defining call. And that’s not right,” Rivers said.

“That was our ball. We got robbed.”

He is going to get a massive fine for that. He didn’t care. He might as well have taken his checkbook into the press conference.

He’s not the only Clipper likely to get fined.

Matt Barnes Instagram: “There’s no question this went off my hand last right?#F*€koutahere!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Questioning the refs and swearing? That’s a fine.

There is a rule explanation floating around twitter, suggesting this is the right call because Barnes hit the hand of the player and forced it out of bounds, and in that case the ball should have gone to OKC. Former NBA head of officials Stu Jackson said because of this it’s the right call. I’ve never seen it called that way. What is more, that is not what the officials said was the reason for their ruling.

The bottom line is the Clippers lost a heartbreaking Game 5. It’s the kind of dramatic win that energizes one side and will demoralize the other. We’ll see if the Clippers can bounce back from this. Or if Rivers has calmed down in two days.

Report: Some Hawks executives doubt Danny Ferry’s contrition

Danny Ferry, Mike Budenholzer
Leave a comment

Since his racist comments about Luol Deng, Danny Ferry has mostly avoided the public eye.

He apologized through a couple statements released around the beginning of his leave of absence. He met with black community leaders. He claimed “full responsibility.”

A cadre of NBA people vouched for him. A law firm the Hawks hired to investigate themselves essentially cleared of him of being motivated by racial bias.

But there’s another side.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

Ferry’s efforts at contrition sometimes fell short to some inside the organization. Several Hawks executives were at times put off by Ferry’s behavior during a compulsory two-day sensitive training session, especially since they considered his actions triggered the assembly in the first place. He came across as inattentive and dismissive of the exercise, some said, and fiddled with his phone quite a bit. Ferry contends he was taking notes on the meeting.

“It was awkward for everyone because I had not seen or been around Hawks employees for three months,” Ferry told ESPN this summer about the sensitivity training. “I took the seminar seriously, participated in the role-play exercises and certainly learned from the two-day session.”

the Hawks satisfied Ferry on June 22 by releasing both the written Taylor report and a flowery press release in which Hawks CEO Koonin was quoted saying, among other things, that “Danny Ferry is not a racist.” Some Hawks executives grumbled that the team overreached in exonerating Ferry, but doing so — not to mention paying Ferry significantly more than the $9 million he was owed on his “golden ticket” deal — was the cost of moving on.

I don’t know whether Ferry has shown the proper level of contrition, whether he was playing on his phone or taking notes.

But I know what he said:

“He’s a good guy overall, but he’s got some African in him, and I don’t say that in a bad way other than he’s a guy that may be making side deals behind you, if that makes sense. He has a storefront out front that’s beautiful and great, but he may be selling some counterfeit stuff behind you.”

He was not reading directly from a scouting report. He did not stop when his paraphrasing repeated a racist trope.

That’s a problem.

I don’t think Ferry intended to say something racist – but he did.

It’s a fixable issue, though. Through introspection and a desire to change, he can learn from this mistake. Maybe he already has.

That some around him don’t think he took that process seriously is worth noting. They might be off base, and Ferry obviously disagrees with their perception. But this is a two-sided story despite the common narrative focusing on Ferry’s redemption.

It’ll be up to any potential future employers to sort through the discrepancies.

Gilbert Arenas: Caron Butler’s version of gun incident ‘false’

arenas wizards
Leave a comment

Caron Butler recently detailed the Gilbert Arenas-Javaris Crittenton gun incident.

In a since-deleted – but screenshot-captured – Instagram post, Arenas gives his description:

The biggest differences between Butler’s and Arenas’ versions:

1. Arenas claims he wasn’t the one who owed Crittenton money, that the feud escalated over Arenas prematurely showing his hand during a card game.

2. Arenas says he told Crittenton to pick a gun to shoot Arenas with – not to pick a gun he’d get shot by Arenas with.