Donald Sterling

Lawmakers want to prevent Donald Sterling from deducting NBA’s $2.5 million fine from his taxes

11 Comments

The NBA calls its financial penalties “fines,” but they’re really forced charitable donations. They’re also, as Lamar Odom successfully argued to the IRS, business expenses.

You can bet Donald Sterling will try to write off his $2.5 million fine on his taxes.

On both the federal and state levels, lawmakers want to prevent that.

Kay Bell of Don’t Mess With Taxes:

Any deduction is just not right, say six House Democrats. So they’ve introduced the Stop Penalizing Taxpayers for Sports Owner Fouls Act of 2014.

The bill, which would apply to fines since Jan. 1, says:

In the case of an individual who owns (directly or indirectly) a professional sports franchise, no deduction shall be allowed under sub- section (a) for any fine or similar penalty paid to the professional sports league or association of which the franchise is a member.’’.

This would apply to Sterling – and was obviously proposed with him in mind.

As unsympathetic as Sterling is, I just don’t believe this law would be constitutional. If passed – which I suspect is unlikely to happen anyway – the courts could deem it ex post facto. In other words, the law punishes for acts committed before the law passed, usually a method not allowed in the United States.

Plus, I don’t like further complicating an already far-too-complicated tax code with a specific rule that singles out sports owners. Why should sports owners have their own tax code? What makes them different than the rest of us? (Yes, I’m against stadium subsidies, too. Don’t fix that problem by creating another.)

California lawmakers are proposing something similar. Phil Willon of the Los Angeles Times:

Two state Assembly members from Los Angeles filed legislation Tuesday that would prevent sports team owners from writing off league fines as a business expense when they file their state income tax returns.

The bill was filed by Democratic Assemblymen Raul Bocanegra of Pacoima and Reggie Jones-Sawyer of Los Angeles.

“Donald Sterling’s outrageous comments and historic fine should not be rewarded with a multimillion-dollar tax refund,” said Bocanegra, who chairs the Revenue and Taxation Committee. “This fine is intended as a punishment; it should not be used as a tax loophole.

The specifics of this bill are not clear, but I have the same concerns stated above.

At least one politician, though, might be on the right track – actually using the Sterling situation to do good. Willon:

Meanwhile, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks) has asked city, state and federal regulators to “prioritize” inquiries into any allegations that Sterling’s companies engaged in racial discrimination against people who sought to rent apartments at the billionaire’s residential properties.

In a letter to the regulators, Sherman cited a payment of more than $2.7 million that Sterling made in 2009 to settle federal claims that he discriminated against tenants. Sherman’s letter did not say there were allegations pending against Sterling or his companies.

If there aren’t new allegations against Sterling, it would be difficult to do much now after he’s settled, but yeah, the government should definitely be further investigating Sterling’s alleged housing discrimination. While they’re at it, apply that level of scrutiny to everyone – not just the headline-inducing Sterling – suspected of housing discrimination. That actually matters.

NBA: Hornets incorrectly denied game-tying FT attempts in final seconds of loss to Clippers

Leave a comment

Foul or defend?

That’s the eternal question for teams trying to protect a late three-point lead.

While many fans believe fouling is the astute strategy, most American coaches opt to defend.

Defending is a better strategy than meets the eye, because it’s relatively easy to defend the arc when you know your opponent needs a 3-pointer. Plus, as coaches commonly believe, fouling offers too many opportunities for something to go wrong.

The Clippers almost learned that the hard way in their win over the Hornets on Sunday.

But an officiating error helped L.A. preserve its late lead, according to the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report.

With the Clippers up three, Chris Paul intentionally fouled Kemba Walker with 2.1 seconds left. Walker made the first free throw and intentionally missed the second.

In the battle for the rebound, Blake Griffin should have been called for committing a loose-ball foul on Marvin Williams with 2.0 seconds left, per the league:

Griffin (LAC) grab Williams’ (CHA) jersey and affect his ability to rebound.

The league also ruled Williams got away with a loose-ball foul on Griffin in the same tenth of a second, but Griffin’s foul should have been whistled first.

A correct call would’ve given Williams — who’s making 85% of his free throws this season and 80% for his career — two attempts from the line with a chance to tie the game.

Instead, Griffin grabbed the rebound and was intentionally fouled with half a second left. He hit one free throw, and the Clippers won, 124-121.

Draymond Green, Kevin Durant take turns playing while holding Durant’s shoe (video)

1 Comment

The adventures of Kevin Durant‘s shoe:

  • Falls off as Durant shoots a jumper
  • Left on the far side of the court for an entire Warriors defensive possession
  • Lightly kicked by 76ers forward Robert Covington, who should have tossed it into the crowed
  • Picked up by Draymond Green, who sets a screen while holding it
  • Tossed by Green to Durant
  • Held by Durant as he defends and tips a rebound
  • Put back on by Durant just in time for him to assist Stephen Curry

Patrick Patterson falls on his back, still strips Derrick Rose (video)

Leave a comment

This is mostly good effort by Patrick Patterson. It’s also bad luck for Derrick Rose, who’s not accustomed to avoiding a player lying on his back.

But it’s hard to resist the jokes about Rose losing a step to the point he can no longer beat even a man who’d fallen on his back off the dribble.

 

Potential top-three NBA-draft prospect, Kansas’ Josh Jackson, charged with misdemeanor property damage

Kansas Jayhawks guard Josh Jackson (11) during a time-out against the Baylor Bears the first half of an NCAA college basketball game in Lawrence, Kan., Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017. (AP Photo/Reed Hoffmann)
AP Photo/Reed Hoffmann
1 Comment

Markelle Fultz is the consensus top prospect in the 2017 NBA draft, and Lonzo Ball is a strong second.

Leading the pack for third? Probably Kansas forward Josh Jackson.

But Jackson’s résumé is now tainted by a misdemeanor property-damage charge.

The incident, which allegedly involved Kansas teammate Lagerald Vick and Kansas women’s basketball playerMcKenzie Calvert, occurred just before 2 a.m. Dec. 9.

Laura Bauer and Mara Rose Williams of The Kansas City Star:

Calvert is the same female KU student who a university investigation found Vick likely committed domestic violence against more than a year ago.

Calvert reportedly threw a drink on a male patron while leaving the bar. The Star has learned that the patron was Vick.

Jackson followed Calvert to her car, according to the release, and they argued. Witnesses saw Jackson kick the driver’s door of Calvert’s car and kick a rear taillight.

The Star has learned that Calvert — a standout on the women’s team — was in the driver’s seat while Jackson kicked her car.

Investigators have interviewed several people who witnessed the reported crime. A police report categorized the $2,991 in total damage to the car as a felony. But Friday’s release listed the damage at a higher amount, $3,150.45.

“Felony criminal damage (damage in excess of $1,000) was not charged because the state cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that all the damage to the door and taillight were caused by Jackson,” the release said.

Jackson said in a statement he would pay for damage he “directly caused.” Kansas coach Bill Self, in his statement, called Jackson a “great ambassador for this university.”

NBA teams shouldn’t and probably won’t blindly accept Self’s self-interested assessment. Jackson’s conduct will likely be investigated during the pre-draft process, determining where it falls on the spectrum of a youthful transgression and the hot-button issue of domestic violence.

The better Jackson plays, the more forgiving teams will be. Right or wrong, that’s how it works. But this incident will be included in the overall assessment of Jackson.