Mavericks’ dramatic comeback falls just short, Spurs even series with win

2 Comments

Dallas came tantalizingly close.

Down 20 in the third quarter they fought all the way back to take a lead late in the fourth — they did it with defense, they did it with Monta Ellis making shots, they did it thanks to DeJuan Blair being everywhere.

But in the end a desperate Spurs team made plays — Boris Diaw hit threes, Manu Ginobili knocked down free throws and Diaw contested a potential Ellis game-tying lay-up and got a miss — and they got a win 93-89.

The win evens the series 2-2 heading back to San Antonio for a crucial Game 5.

Mavs fans thought they had this one, they were going nuts in the arena. They might blame the loss on another cold shooting night for the loss (Ellis and Dirk Nowitzki were a combined 13-of-39, 33.3 percent). They might want to blame the referees for ejecting DeJuan Blair with three minutes left. They might… oh, who are we kidding, Tony Romo was in the building and you know if it’s a close loss in the playoffs it is his fault.

San Antonio’s offense is simply not as consistently sharp as we are used to seeing it — the offense lacks the movement and crisp passing we were saw when they racked up the best record in the NBA. Give some credit to the feisty defense from the Mavericks trying to create turnovers, but part of this is just execution from San Antonio. We saw it in a stretch during Monday’s game.

Dallas had raced out to 10 point lead early, but starting late in the first quarter and into the second the Spurs took charge of the game, They were getting the shots they wanted, contesting everything on defense (the Mavs started the second quarter 1-of-12 shooting , getting easy buckets thanks to ball movement. Manu Ginobili was a big spark for this and finished the game with 23 points on 14 shots — he has been the best Spur player in this series and was +11 in this game.

Dallas, on the other hand, had won the last couple games because while the Spurs had shut down Dirk Nowitzki (he was 7-of-19 shooting for the game, once again Tiago Splitter did a fantastic job guarding Nowitzki) other guys had stepped up. Not this time. Monta Ellis was 2-of-8 in the first half. Other Mavs followed suit.

Early in the third quarter the Spurs lead grew to 20 — and that’s when Blair started outworking everyone on the court. That’s when shots started falling for Ellis. That’s when the other Mavs started to find a way to contest and get some balls they could turn into transition plays.

By the middle of the fourth quarter the Mavs had closed the gap completely, Dallas opened the quarter This game was going to be close the rest of the way.

But then Blair got ejected with three minutes left for this play:

The refs said it was done in hostility. You can argue that the kick wasn’t intentional, that Splitter was on his legs and he reacted — but you can’t kick a guy in the head. It’s an ejection every time.

That is it changed the game. It’s kind of amazing to say but yes, losing DeJuan Blair was a huge blow to the Mavericks.

San Antonio won the game thanks to its French Connection.

Tony Parker and Diaw had been playing a pick-and-pop at the top of the key all game with some success. With the game on the line in the final minute they did it again — Parker attacked off a Diaw pick and got into the lane, then kicked it back to Diaw who had time to set and fire and he knocked down the three that proved to be the game winner.

It took more, of course. Nowitzki made it a one-point game on an offensive rebound and putback. Ginobili was fouled but hit just one of two, making it a two-point Spurs lead.

Monta Ellis got the call and drove for bucket off Nowitzki handoff, a great play design… but he misses the shot. Give Diaw credit for contesting and making Ellis work for it, but that’s one he hits more often than not.

San Antonio sealed the win from the line and now goes home for what is now a best-of-three. San Antonio has had to work harder for this than expected, but if the Spurs from the second quarter of this game shows up they are going to be partying on Riverwalk again.

Watch Lonzo Ball dodge relentless stream of LeBron James questions (video)

Elsa/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Shortly before the draft, Lonzo Ball was asked in a televised interview to pitch LeBron James on joining the Lakers – and did.

A couple months and a tampering investigation into the Lakers later, Ball learned his lesson.

Sports Illustrated:

Rohan Nadkarni’s questions were all in good fun, and he couldn’t trick Ball into tampering, anyway. The NBA has essentially decided it won’t punish players for tampering with each other.

Ask Ball an honest LeBron question, and he’ll give an honest answer.

Report: People close to LeBron James ‘fairly confident’ Dwyane Wade will join Cavaliers

Jason Miller/Getty Images
3 Comments

Will the Bulls and Dwyane Wade reach a buyout?

Apparently, not only do people close to LeBron James believe it’ll happen, they have a read on Wade’s destination.

Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:

As of right now, people close to James are fairly confident that, at some point this year, Dwyane Wade is going to end up on the Cavs.

Earlier in the podcast, Vardon even listed the only five people he believes reports should source as close to LeBron:

  • LeBron
  • Rich Paul
  • Maverick Carter
  • Savanah James
  • Adam Mendelsohn

So, that something about the proximity of this information to LeBron. Given Wade’s friendship with LeBron, Vardon’s sources could have inside information on Wade’s plan.

But hold your horses on Wade to Cleveland.

Though they could buy him out sooner, the Bulls are incentivized to keep Wade past the trade deadline. His $23.8 million expiring contract could prove useful in a trade. If no trade comes up and Chicago is out of the playoff race, as expected, a buyout would make far more sense. Now, eliminating that trade chip and sticking a large amount of dead salary on the books would be problematic for the Bulls – unless Wade cuts them a big discount. He doesn’t sound inclined to do that.

Even if Wade gets bought out, he has been rumored to follow LeBron to Cleveland for years. It obviously hasn’t happened yet. Wade’s friendship with LeBron is the primary lure – but it also might push Wade to signal a desire to team up while he can’t commit then go a different direction when push comes to shove. It can be hard to tell friends no.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Wade ends up with the Cavaliers. But I also wouldn’t be surprised if this is just wishful thinking by people close to LeBron.

Clippers’ Jerry West: ‘I did not want to leave’ Warriors

Stephen Dunn/Getty Images
1 Comment

A report emerged last spring that Jerry West was nearing a deal to stay with the Warriors as a consultant. Instead, he took the same job with the Clippers.

West, via Tim Kawakami of The Athletic, via NBC Sports Bay Area:

“Frankly it was very sad, OK? It really was. A place where I thought that if I was going to work another year or if somebody wanted me to work another year, I thought I could contribute; I did not want to leave. I did not want to leave. I was very happy there.

But those things happen sometimes. Obviously to be around a bunch of players that were as together as any I’ve seen and I think more importantly the talent that was on that team and to see the joy. There’s a lot of joy there. I think those are the kind of environments where people really prosper.”

“It was time for me to leave. I’m in Los Angeles again. For me, I’ll have a chance to go in the office a little bit and watch some of the people that have been hired, to watch our coaches coach. I’ve often said I’ve done some crazy things in my life because of the timing and maybe the timing was right.”

The Clippers’ appeal appeared to be their salary offer – reportedly $4 million-$5 million annually. And maybe that factored.

But it sure sounds as if there’s more to the story.

With Gordon Hayward and Jayson Tatum, Celtics continue ascent – just not as steeply as hoped

AP Photo/Charles Krupa
2 Comments

NBCSports.com’s Dan Feldman is grading every team’s offseason based on where the team stands now relative to its position entering the offseason. A ‘C’ means a team is in similar standing, with notches up or down from there.

The Celtics landed the No. 1 pick and signed the top free agent to change teams.

Given that, it feels like their offseason should have gone better.

Jayson Tatum and Gordon Hayward are nice, and I won’t lose sight of that here. But…

Boston traded down from the top pick to No. 3 to draft Tatum. Count me among those who believed there was a significant drop from Markelle Fultz and Lonzo Ball to the next tier – and the tier after that.

The extra first-rounder the Celtics acquired has also only lost value since the trade.

It’d convey from the Lakers if they pick 2-5 next year. But they added two players, Brook Lopez and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, better than they were expected to get. Los Angeles looks less likely to stumble into a top-five pick – especially without incentive to tank.

If not the Lakers’ pick this season, Boston will get the higher of Sacramento’s and Philadelphia’s 2019 first-rounders (or lower if one is No. 1). The Kings signed a couple veterans, George Hill and Zach Randolph, to help them in 2018-19. Sacramento’s young players will be more developed by then, and mirroring the Lakers this year, there’s no incentive to tank. (Philadelphia is also on the rise, but the Celtics probably already knew that.)

There’s still a chance Boston winds up with a high pick – or even wins the trade with a middling additional selection. Tatum, as the Celtics have claimed, might be a better prospect than Fultz outright.

I originally thought the trade was about fair. Developments swing the pendulum away from Boston, though perhaps I’m overly colored by my relatively dim evaluation of Tatum. (I expected the Celtics to draft Josh Jackson when the trade was made.)

Boston’s next big move, signing Hayward, also comes with a major caveat. To get Hayward, the Celtics had to downgrade from Avery Bradley to Marcus Morris.

The reasons are clear: Bradley is earning $8,808,989 in the final season of his contract. Morris is locked up for two more seasons at $5 million and $5,375,000.

Not only was that salary difference essential for clearing max cap space now, Bradley will enter unrestricted free agency with Isaiah Thomas next summer. The raises necessary to re-sign both likely would’ve pushed the Celtics higher into the luxury tax than they’re willing to go. Thomas and Morris should be affordable.

Morris is a fine player, but it looks like he’s caught between better combo forwards (Hayward and Jae Crowder) and higher-upside/younger combo forwards (Jaylen Brown and Tatum). How much will Morris matter in Boston?

Bradley certainly did plenty, defending the better opposing guard so the undersized Thomas didn’t have to. Marcus Smart can handle some of that responsibility, but that cuts into the time he can play in relief of Thomas at point guard and the time he can defend forwards.

Getting Aron Baynes for the room exception was solid. He might even start for the Celtics, eating up minutes against big starting centers. I suspect Al Horford will play center in most pivotal minutes, though.

Signing Baynes was one of Boston’s several respectable moves – drafting Semi Ojeleye in the second round, signing 2016 first-rounders Guerschon Yabusele and Ante Zizic and paying to take a flier on Shane Larkin.

But the real needle-movers were signing Hayward, a 27-year-old versatile star, and adding a highly touted talent in Tatum. Even in the less-flattering greater context, those are huge additions.

Offseason grade: A-