Memphis Grizzlies v Oklahoma City Thunder - Game Two

Should Scott Brooks be on hot seat in Oklahoma City?


Oklahoma City has a huge deadline looming on the horizon — in 2016 Kevin Durant can leave as an unrestricted free agent.

Durant is not your average young star, he’s not just going to chase the bright lights in the big city because he can. He’ll stay in a smaller market — if he thinks he can win there. And that is becoming the big question in OKC, as they are down 2-1 to the Memphis Grizzlies in their first round playoff series: Can OKC win? Or, more specifically:

Can OKC win there with Scott Brooks as coach? Can he elevate them to the level they need to win a title? To keep Durant?

That question has come up again in the wake of OKC’s playoff struggles against Memphis. The normally efficient Kevin Durant is struggling from the field (22-of-55 the last two games, that’s 40 percent shooting) and Russell Westbrook is doing no better (20-of-54 in last two games, 37 percent). We should credit Tony Allen and the stout Grizzlies defense for some of that. And it’s not Scott Brooks fault that viable third options such as James Harden and Kevin Martin are no longer on the roster.

But some of the Thunder’s struggles come back to the coach. He sticks with Kendrick Perkins for long stretches against all logic. Brooks runs fairly simple sets, and when Memphis has taken away the first option — as any good defensive team will do in the playoffs — the Thunder offense has broken down. There is a whole lot of Durant or Westbrook against the world while the other watches. Remember the first season LeBron James and Dwyane Wade were paired in Miami and they just seemed to take turns (with an odd possession here or there thrown to Chris Bosh)? Right now Oklahoma City feels like that. At times it looks like that.

During Thursday night’s Thunder loss in Memphis, a frustrated Ray Westbrook — the brother of Russell — tweeted that the Thunder needed a new coach. He has since deleted that tweet and apologized for it.

But he said what some are thinking.

Durant and other players will back Brooks — they cam into the league with him, grew up in the NBA with him and they like him. But that is different than what is best for them, best for the franchise.

Oklahoma City is not improving, not progressing. They feel like they are regressing (even if they come back and beat the Grizzlies this series, a tough challenge against the Clippers is looming, a team playing a little better each game right now).

If OKC loses in the first round, or even the second, GM Sam Presti and the Thunder brain trust have some hard questions to ask about how this team is built and who is leading it. What moves do they need to make to reach the next level? That may well mean a new coach as well as roster moves.

They will need to do something before the summer of 2016.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
Leave a comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?