Report: Carmelo Anthony’s camp doesn’t want to wait for 2015 Knicks rebuild

70 Comments

Every player says it. Carmelo Anthony is saying it. It’s is some variant of “I’m not about the money, I’m about winning.”

Then the money goes on the table and it’s all about the money.

That’s the choice facing Carmelo Anthony this summer — a big payday from the Knicks and trust them to rebuild over a few seasons, or take a pay cut to go to a contender. Maybe a steep pay cut.

Frank Isola writes at the Daily News ‘Melo may not want to wait.

But the Knicks’ salary-cap situation is such that if they re-sign Anthony they’ll have to wait until 2015 to add that second star. For one, I’m hearing that Anthony’s camp is interested only in the summer of 2014. They don’t want to hear about 2015. And they’re right. Anthony will be 31 with a lot of NBA miles on his legs before reinforcements arrive.

This is the New York media, they are more than happy to stir up questions and the fan base. Still, Isola makes a good argument that the smart long-term move for the Knicks is to let Anthony walk as a free agent this summer — be bad for another year and in 2015 they will have a high pick (they still have that one, can’t trade it) and a lot of cap space. However, all indications are that Plan A and Plan B and Plan C in the Knicks’ front office is to bring back Anthony. The team switched general managers to a guy with a better relationship with CAA — which represents Anthony — for that purpose.

Which means Anthony is going to have a pretty stark choice this summer.

The New York Knicks can offer the most money — starting at $22 million plus one more guaranteed year on the end of the deal. Nobody is going to match that. But the Knicks roster next season will look a lot like the 21-40 team this season — the massive contracts of Andrea Bargnani, Amar’e Stoudemire and Tyson Chandler (plus ‘Melo) would make really meaningful moves difficult. Maybe they can shake things up at the draft of in July, but meaningful change is not likely. The real plan is a 2015 rebuild with free agents when those other guys come off the books — Kevin Love, Rajon Rondo and others are potential free agents that summer. Convince them to join ‘Melo in NYC.

Anthony has said repeatedly — and to PBT on All-Star weekend — that he wants to stay a Knick and would take less money to do so but he needs to see what their plan for rebuilding the roster really looks like. The next question becomes should Anthony trust the Knicks management to rebuild a winner around him? New York will always be a draw to free agents, but this franchise has won one playoff series in a decade. Smart rebuilds have not been a tradition in New York under current ownership.

Of course, if Anthony wants to jump to a contender he is going to have to take a pay cut. Maybe a steep one.

The Chicago Bulls often get mentioned as a likely destination (and they make the best roster sense on paper), but if all they do is amnesty Carlos Boozer they will be able to offer roughly $14 million a year for four years (depending on other moves). If the Bulls shed Taj Gibson’s salary they can get up closer to $20 million, but it cuts into their depth. If I were Chicago I’d make the lower offer and keep the young core of the team (Derrick Rose, Joakim Noah, Gibson, Jimmy Butler) together.

(There was some Miami speculation out there, which can be best described as radically far fetched. Basically their existing big three would opt out and take pay cuts down to less than $15 million a year, then Anthony would do the same. Good luck with all that.)

Anthony’s other options are limited. The Lakers are not interested. Dallas might be but that is Dirk Nowitzki’s team, plus you need a ball dominant point guard with Anthony to limit his tendency to be a black hole on offense (passes go in but nothing comes out). The Clippers don’t have the cap space and aren’t trading Blake Griffin for him (that is a Knicks’ fantasy that has no basis in Clipper reality).

So what will it be ‘Melo? Contending or money?

Important news: Nick Young has gotten over his fear of dolphins

1 Comment

Where NBA players really make improvements is over the summer. They can get in better shape, work on their jumper, improve their handles…

Or get over their fear of dolphins.

Which is what the new Wizards guard did this summer. Remember these tweets from Young’s then fiancée a couple of years ago?

He’s gotten past that fear.

I gave these dolphins another chance we cool now

A post shared by Nick Young (@swaggyp1) on

Next, just needs to pick up a right with Golden State and show that to the Dolphins — they respect titles.

Report: Mikhail Prokhorov ‘warmed’ to selling controlling stake of Nets

Kent Smith/NBAE via Getty Images
2 Comments

Mikhail Prokhorov bought 80% of the Nets in 2010. A couple years ago, he tried to sell his stake, but decided to keep it. Then, he bought 100% of the franchise and its arena. After last season, he said he was selling 49% of the team.

Now?

Josh Kosman and Brian Lewis of the New York Post:

Brooklyn Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov, while focused on selling a minority stake in the franchise, has warmed recently to the possibility of offering a controlling slice of the team, sources close to the situation said.

The change of heart comes after the initial reaction to the minority stake sale was weak — and with interest in the Houston Rockets sale heating up, one source said.

The Rockets’ sale could shake out potential Nets buyers, and Prokhorov selling a controlling stake could also help. It’d cost more money than the 49% he’s offering now, but people with the money to buy an NBA team tend to value control.

This might be a good time to sell for Prokhorov, who lost a ton of money as the team paid major luxury tax for an all-in championship pursuit that flopped spectacularly. The NBA’s popularity is rising, and the league is reaping huge revenue from its national-TV contracts.

However, he shouldn’t assume the Rockets’ sale price will predict the Nets’. Buyers might prefer a good team with James Harden and Chris Paul to a bad one short on young talent after years of mismanagement. At least Brooklyn’s payroll is now tolerably low.

The big loser here: Leslie Alexander, who’s trying to sell the Rockets. The supply of NBA teams now available might have just doubled, and unless there’s no overlap in demand for those franchises, that can only drive down Alexander’s eventual sale price.

Report: Clippers paid $3.2 million – second-most ever – for draft pick (Jawun Evans)

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
3 Comments

The Warriors set a record by paying $3.5 million for a draft pick, buying the Bulls’ No. 38 pick and using it on Jordan Bell this year.

That eclipsed the $3 million spent by each the Thunder in 2010 (to the Hawks for the No. 31 pick, Tibor Pleiss) and Nets in 2016 (to move up 13 spots for Isaiah Whitehead).

So did the Clippers’ purchase of the No. 39 pick (Jawun Evans) from the 76ers this year.

Eric Pincus of Basketball Insiders:

The Clippers also paid the Bucks $2 million for the No. 48 pick (Sindarius Thornwell).

I rated Evans a low first-rounder due to his speed and drive-and-kick game, so getting him in the second round is good value. I’m not as keen on Thornwell, who’s already 22 and built so much of his success at South Carolina on being more physical than younger opponents.

But the more swings the Clippers take on young players, the more likely they are to find long-term contributors. More power to owner Steve Ballmer for greenlighting this expenditure.

Importantly, as players acquired through the draft, Evans and Thornwell will count for the luxury tax at their actual salaries. Players signed otherwise, even if their actual salaries are lower, count at at least the two-years-experience minimum.

Under the new Collective Bargaining Agreement, teams can spend $5.1 million in cash this season. That amount will increase (or decrease) in proportion with the salary cap in coming years. So, expect the previous record for draft-pick purchase price – $3 million – to fall again and again.

There’s just more leeway now for the NBA’s haves to separate themselves from the have-nots.

Jeannie Buss says she didn’t understand why Lakers signed Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov

Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
8 Comments

Last summer, the Lakers signed Luol Deng (four years, $72 million) and Timofey Mozgov (four years, $64 million) to contracts that immediately looked like liabilities.

At worst, Deng and Mozgov would help the Lakers win just enough to lose their top-three protected 2017 first-round pick – which would have triggered also sending out an unprotected 2019 first-rounder – then settle in as huge overpays. At best, Deng and Mozgov would provide a little veteran leadership while the team still loses enough to keep its pick… then settle in as huge overpays.

The Lakers got the best-case scenario, which was still pretty awful.

They had to attach D'Angelo Russell just to dump Mozgov’s deal on the Nets. Even if he no longer fit long-term with Lonzo Ball, Russell could’ve fit another asset if he weren’t necessary as a sweetener in a Mozgov trade. Deng remains on the books as impediment to adding free agents (like Paul George and LeBron James) next summer.

Who’s to blame?

Jeanie Buss was the Lakers’ president and owner. Jim Buss, another owner, ran the front office with Mitch Kupchak.

Bill Oram of The Orange County Register:

Within the walls of the Lakers headquarters, Jeanie’s grand corner office had begun to feel like a cell. She could not make sense of the strategy employed by her brother and Kupchak. They had cycled through four coaches in five seasons and under their watch the Lakers won a combined 63 games in three full seasons. Last summer, they spent $136 million of precious cap space on veterans Luol Deng and Timofey Mozgov, who made little sense for the direction of the team.

“I just didn’t understand what the thought process was,” she said, “whether our philosophies were so far apart that I couldn’t recognize what they were doing, or they couldn’t explain it well.”

No. Nope, nope, nope. I don’t want to hear it.

Jeanie empowered Jim and his silly timeline, which made it inevitable he place self-preservation over the Lakers’ best long-term interests. That’s why he looked for a quick fix with Mozgov and Deng, who’s still hanging over the Lakers’ plans.

She deserves scrutiny for allowing such a toxic environment that yielded predictably bad results (even if family ties clouded her judgment).

That said, she also deserves credit for learning from her mistake. She fired Jim and Kupchak – admittedly too late, but she still did it – and hired Magic Johnson. There’s no guarantee Johnson will direct the Lakers back to prominence, but he clearly has a better working relationship with Jeanie than Jim did and, so far (in a small sample), looks more competent in the job.