Report: Luol Deng won’t sign extension with any team, limiting Cavaliers chances of trading him

26 Comments

The Cavaliers were so desperate to make the playoffs this season, they traded for Luol Deng without any guarantee he’d stay with Cleveland this summer.

Deng’s production has fallen off, though the Cavaliers were so deficient at small forward, he’s actually helped them (8-10 with him, 13-23 without him). Still, Cleveland is three games out of playoff position.

That’s why the Cavaliers are considering trading Deng. That and the fact that their team is in disarray, and they must know Deng recognizes that.

But will any other team trade for Deng, a pending free agent, without him signing an extension? And would he do it?

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports:

Forward Luol Deng’s reluctance to commit to a long-term extension with any team before July free agency makes it unlikely that the Cleveland Cavaliers can find a willing trade partner before Thursday’s NBA deadline, league sources told Yahoo Sports.

The Cavaliers have had conversations with several teams, including Dallas, Detroit and Indiana about Deng, league sources told Yahoo Sports. Nevertheless, there’s no traction on a deal and no team seems inclined to give up valuable assets for a player who could walk away in free agency.

Unless the Cavaliers are willing to sell low, this will definitely narrow their pool of trade partners. Maybe some team(s) would accept Deng as a half-season rental, someone who can help with a playoff run. But more teams would trade for him if he’d sign an extension.

I’m a little surprised Deng is so anti-extension – unless he’s really not and is just unsatisfied with the offers he’s gotten. That’s be more rationale. Still, I’d imagine leaving Chicago for Cleveland has opened Deng’s eyes to how less-cohesive teams function, and he probably doesn’t want to get stuck somewhere without learning more about the team.

But if a team offers a big-money extension, would he really turn it down? And if that team wanted Deng badly enough to offer a sizable extension, wouldn’t it also probably offer the Cavaliers enough to accept a trade?

It seems no team values Deng highly enough to make that happen. That’s a product of his play in Cleveland and his contract status.

A lot will change this summer for Deng, and there’s a good chance he gets the contract he desires then. Unless a Cleveland trade partner steps up with an impressive extension offer, he’s better off letting this season play out, which seems to be what he’s doing.

Are Bulls and Dwyane Wade moving toward a buyout?

Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Leave a comment

About a month ago, the Bulls said they hadn’t discussed a buyout with Dwyane Wade.

Have the two sides progressed since?

Nick Friedell of ESPN:

Dwyane Wade isn’t long for the organization’s future and is expected to reach a buyout agreement at some point in the next few months.

Expected by whom?

People with direct knowledge of momentum toward a buyout?

Or everyone who can see that a 35-year-old earning $23.8 million fits poorly on a rebuilding team?

For the Bulls to now drop their biggest name and a large expiring contract that could prove useful in trades should require Wade surrendering a large portion of his salary. He doesn’t sound like someone inclined to do that yet.

A few months is a long time. As long as Wade gets bought out by March 1, he could join another team’s playoff roster. It’d surprise nobody if he gets bought out after the February trade deadline, which we already knew. I don’t see strong indication of something more imminent.

LeBron James’ camp already shooting down leaving-Cavaliers rumor

AP Photo/Tony Dejak
Leave a comment

LeBron James has done a terrible job shooting down rumors about him leaving the Cavaliers

Except this one from Chris Sheridan, who cited a source saying LeBron would “100 percent” leave Cleveland next summer due to a rift with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert.

Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:

Sheridan’s source saying LeBron is leaving doesn’t make that true. But other anonymous sources denying it doesn’t make the denials true, either.

New Orleans Saints fire Pelicans’ team physician

Thomas B. Shea/Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Pelicans have been crushed by injuries the last few years.

Why? That’s an incredibly complex question.

But the New Orleans Saints – who share an owner (Tom Benson), a front-office leader (Mickey Loomis) and other staff with the Pelicans – have found culprits for their own injury woes.

Mike Triplett of ESPN:

The Saints have fired team orthopedists Deryk Jones and Misty Suri, per source, after it was discovered that CB Delvin Breaux has a fractured fibula and will require surgery expected to sidelined him for 4-6 weeks. Breaux was originally diagnosed with a contusion

Suri is a Pelicans team physician.

Scott Kushner of The Advocate:

Fairly or not, Suri – after the Saints deemed him unacceptable – will be in the crosshairs if he keeps his job with the the Pelicans and their injury woes continue.

Rumor: LeBron James ‘100 percent’ leaving Cavaliers next summer

Ezra Shaw/Getty Images
13 Comments

Chris Sheridan was ahead of the crowd in 2014, reporting LeBron James would likely leave the Heat for the Cavaliers – which obviously happened.

But Sheridan called it a “90 percent chance,” a small – but large enough – hedge. He also said LeBron would announce the decision on LeBron’s personal website. Of course, LeBron revealed his choice in a Sports Illustrated essay.

So, maybe Sheridan knows what he’s talking about. Maybe he doesn’t.

But the longtime NBA writer just fanned the flames of the already hot LeBron-leaving-Cleveland rumors.

Sheridan:

Of course, the denials came quickly.

There have already been plenty of warning signs about LeBron’s relationship with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert, which didn’t restart in a great place.

It’s entirely believable LeBron would leave Cleveland, in large part due to Gilbert.

But it’s also fun to speculate about that salacious storyline.

Maybe Sheridan or his source got carried away for that very reason. Or maybe they know something.

Neither possibility should be discounted.