A Spurs team without many of its stars can still prove difficult for opponents to deal with, in large part because of the way San Antonio consistently stacks its team with players perfectly suited to perform in the highly-disciplined system engineered by tenured head coach Gregg Popovich.
That was true for a while in Thursday night’s contest against the Nets, but ultimately Brooklyn was able to exploit the matchups to come away with the 103-89 victory.
San Antonio was without Tony Parker due to a back issue, and Tim Duncan simply got the night off to rest after the team’s double-overtime win in Washington on Wednesday. Manu Ginobili and Kawhi Leonard remained out due to injury, leaving a crew devoid of any star power or historically consistent level of production to tackle a Nets team playing at close to full strength.
Brooklyn was sluggish in the early going, falling behind by as many as 12 points in the first quarter. They began to pick things up late in the second, closing the half on a 10-2 run to take a one-point lead at the break.
The Nets kept rolling in the third, expanding their lead to 10 before the Spurs stabilized and battled back some. Alan Anderson then took control offensively, scoring nine points in the final 2:27 of the third, and then continuing his personal attack with 10 more in the final period to help his team pull away. Anderson finished with a game-high 22 points.
There aren’t many takeaways from this game on the Spurs side, other than guys like Nando de Colo and Corey Joseph essentially getting a D-League game’s worth of minutes, only against real competition under the tutelage of one of the game’s best coaches. San Antonio has this luxury, as the health of the team for the playoffs is more important than any singular regular season outing.
The Nets, meanwhile, need every win they can get after getting off to such a rough start. This one was far from perfect, and there will be plenty of teaching points for Jason Kidd to point to in the coming days if he so chooses. But the victory, no matter how it came and against whatever level of competition was in front of them, will be cherished nonetheless.
Chris Bosh was putting videos on Instagram of himself out shooting on the court. His wife had taken to social media using the hashtag #letBoshplay. Bosh had reached out and gotten the players’ union involved. Bosh wanted to play, the Heat and their team doctors were not about to let him after he went back on blood thinners due to a clotting issue that can be life threatening.
It was becoming a distraction to a team up 1-0 in the second round of the playoffs.
Wednesday afternoon the two sides put this to rest.
This was never Bosh’s decision to make alone, it had to be him and the organization on the same page. And the Heat organization was not changing its mind.
Miami had to go small and change their style of play without Bosh, but it has worked — Goran Dragic found room to operate, the Heat offense took off, and the emergence of Hassan Whiteside as a rim protector has kept the defense from slipping much.
The Heat needed seven games to vanquish the Hornets in the first round. While technically underdogs in the second round against Toronto, the Heat have real matchup advantages that could see them advance to the conference finals — likely against LeBron James and the Cavaliers.
It is unfortunate that is happening without Bosh, but there are things more important than basketball. Bosh’s long-term health has to be on that list.
Not that they need him yet, but Stephen Curry has been doing everything he can to get back on the court for the Golden State Warriors by Game 3 on Saturday.
That includes getting platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy on his sprained right knee, reports Diamond Leung of the Mercury News.
Warriors guard Stephen Curry said Tuesday he received platelet-rich plasma treatment as part of his treatment on his sprained right knee.
PRP, which is said to promote healing, was given to Curry on the second day of his recovery process, he said.
While thought to be exotic when Kobe Bryant used to go to Germany for this treatment on his knees a few years back, now this treatment is relatively common among professional athletes.
The question remains (and likely will until game day) whether the Warriors will bring back Curry for Game 3. On one hand, they aren’t pressured to do so up 2-0 on the Trail Blazers and with some matchup advantages Portland is not going to be able to solve. The Warriors don’t need to rush him back to make sure they win this series.
On the other hand, between the ankle and now knee injuries Curry has missed a lot of time and there is a rust factor — the Warriors want to shake that rust off against Portland, not in Game 1 of the conference finals against a much tougher opponent. Meaning even if you don’t see Curry in Game 3, you will see him in Game 4 (unless something is more wrong with him than is being let on).
Unable to present a quality team, it seems the Kings are trying to woo fans by hiring old favorites.
Vlade Divac is general manager. Peja Stojakovic is director of player personnel. Corliss Williamson is an assistant coach. Sacramento also tried to hire Bobby Jackson.
What about Mike Bibby?
The Kings might settle for his dad.
Jason Jones of The Sacramento Bee:
Marc Stein of ESPN:
Bibby made a name for himself as a coach at USC, where he hovered around .500 from 1996 until 2004. Since, he has coached in the WNBA and bounced between the 76ers, Grizzlies and Pistons as an assistant. He’d be a pretty underwhelming hire.
Ditto Borrego, who looked in over his head when the Magic named him interim coach last season. But that’s not an easy situation for an unproven coach. Returning to the Spurs, coupled with lessons from Orlando, might have Borrego more prepared for his head-coaching job.
Sacramento’s interest in Ettore Messina was already known, and he’d be a solid hire. But would he leave San Antonio for this job? Unlike Bibby and Borrego, Messina comes up for most openings.
The Kings continue to search far and wide for a coach, and that’s smart. Get smart basketball people in a room and ask how they’d fix the franchise. Take notes.
Then, eventually, hire one of them.
The Lakers might not even have a first-round pick this year.
Thanks to the ill-fated Steve Nash sign-and-trade, the Lakers owe the 76ers (via the Suns) a top-three-protected first-rounder. As the No. 2 seed in the lottery, the Lakers have just better than a coin-flip chance of landing in the top three and keeping the pick.
But if the Lakers land the top selection, they might not engage in the Ben Simmons-or-Brandon Ingram debate.
Colin Cowherd of Fox Sports:
Is this a good idea? The answer, as usual, is it depends on what they could get.
There’s a logic to adding another young player whose peak would align with Lakers’ core. D'Angelo Russell (20), Julius Randle (21) and Jordan Clarkson (23) aren’t ready to win. It might be better to add someone who will enter his prime when they do.
But the Lakers’ market and prestige make them a popular free-agent destination, and free agents value winning. Moderate improvements that would stick many teams on the mediocrity treadmill could open the door for the Lakers signing a star.
The Lakers should weigh these factors and trade offers logically and decide what to do if they get a top pick.
Of course, there are other factors. Jim Buss faces a somewhat-self-imposed deadline for contending. To the person in charge, what’s best for the franchise’s long-term outlook might not matter as much as a potential quick fix.