Madison Square Garden

Knicks most valuable NBA franchise, worth $1.4 billion according to Forbes


A more favorable Collective Bargaining Agreement for the owners coupled with a crop of young stars increasing television ratings has been good for NBA owners.

Franchise valuations are up. Way up. Setting record levels up. Up 25 percent on average over a year ago up. The average team made a profit of $23.7 million.

And you wonder why the owners are so loyal to David Stern.

Those figures are from Forbes Magazine, which released its annual report on franchise values Wednesday. While the magazine’s assessment is admittedly somewhat flawed, until the NBA owners decide to open their books up to the public (good luck with that) this is the best we have.

At the top of the list money-making list is the New York Knicks, which in a renovated Madison Square Garden is worth a record $1.4 billion, according to Forbes. Because the renovated building is drawing in more money than expected, the Knicks had a league-record profit for the 2012-13 season of $96 million, the magazine estimates.

The Lakers are just half a step back of the Knicks in franchise value at $1.35 billion, reports Forbes, and the team turned a tidy $66 million profit, according to the magazine. The main reason for all the cash is the massive $3.6 billion local television deal they struck with Time Warner Cable.

The rest of the top 10 are the Chicago Bulls ($1 billion), the Boston Celtics ($875 million), the Brooklyn Nets ($780 million), the Houston Rockets ($775 million), the Miami Heat ($770 million), the Dallas Mavericks ($760 million), the Golden State Warriors ($750 million), and the San Antonio Spurs ($660 million).

The bottom five are the Minnesota Timberwolves ($430 million, and they operated at a $2.7 million loss last season according to Forbes), the Atlanta Hawks ($425 million), the New Orleans Pelicans ($420 million), the Charlotte Bobcats ($410 million), and the Milwaukee Bucks ($405 million).

Brandon Armstrong impersonates Ray Allen (video)

2014 NBA Finals - Game Five
Leave a comment

Ray Allen is retired-ish, but he’ll always be running through screens – in our mind and in this video.

Celtics draft pick Marcus Thornton gets beer dumped on head during Australian game (video)

Marcus Thornton, Will Cherry
Leave a comment

The Celtics drafted Marcus Thornton with No. 45 pick in the 2015 NBA draft. That essentially entitled him to the required tender – a one-year contract offer, surely unguaranteed at the minimum.

Thornton rejected that, which is almost always a mistake.

Rejecting the tender is a favor to the drafting team, which gets to keep the player’s exclusive rights for a year. If Thornton tries to join the NBA now, he’s stuck negotiating with only the Celtics.

By accepting the tender, the player typically gets one of two outcomes. He either plays on that contract and draws an NBA salary or he gets waived. But even getting waived is better than rejecting the tender, because at least the player becomes a free agent and can negotiate with any team.

Players who reject the tender go to another league and play for less money. In Thornton’s case, that mean Australia.

How’s that going?

(Almost) never reject the required tender as a second-round pick.

Byron Scott says they just have to get Kobe Bryant better looks

Kobe Bryant, Joe Johnson, Byron Scott

Kobe Bryant is averaging 15.2 points a game at age 37. It’s just taking him 16.4 shots per game to get there. After his 1-of-14 shooting performance against the Warriors the other night — with too much isolation and too many plays run just for him — there has been a lot of talk about his shot. With reason, this is his shot chart so far this season.

Kobe shotchart season

So what do the Lakers’ do? Get Kobe to shoot less and get the ball in the hands of the young stars they supposed to be developing more? Nah.

They just need to get Kobe better looks, Scott told the Los Angeles Times.

“I know his mentality is that he can still play in this league,” Scott said. “And we feel the same way….

“Obviously he’s struggling right now with his shot, and I think everybody can see that,” Scott said. “So it’s trying to get him in better position to be able to have an opportunity to knock those shots down on a consistent basis. That’s No. 1.

“I don’t know if it’s his legs. I don’t think so. Again, our conversations are pretty blunt. … He tells me when he is tired and he tells me when he’s not tired. And the last few days, he said he feels great. So, I don’t think it’s a matter of him being tired or his legs being tired. I think it’s a matter of his timing being a little off.”

Yes, how could it be his legs? It’s not like he’s a 37-year-old with more than 55,000 NBA minutes played, and coming off an Achilles rupture and major knee surgery.

Honestly, I hope the Lakers and Kobe find a balance soon, because they have become just hard to watch. And I don’t want Kobe to go out this way.

Is Stephen Curry the Lionel Messi of the NBA?

Lionel Messi

Stephen Curry has reached the transcendent point in his career. We’re now talking about if he has passed LeBron James as the best player on the planet (he has), and we’re starting to think about his legacy as the perfect point guard for a modern NBA small-ball, space-and-pace offense. Plus he’s just a joy to watch play.

Does that make him the Lionel Messi of the NBA?

Curry was asked to compare himself to the Barcelona/Argentinian player who (arguably) is the greatest soccer player in the world, certainly as elite a finisher as that sport has ever seen. Here is his answer, via the Sydney Morning Herald of Australia. Is Curry the bigger international star now?

“I don’t know – it’s a chicken and egg kind of conversation,” Curry said while laughing.

“We both have a creative style, a feel when you are out on the pitch or the court. I’m trying to do some fancy things out there with both hands, making crossover moves and having a certain flair to my game and that’s definitely the style Messi has when he is out there in his matches.”

I love Curry, but Messi is the bigger international star.

But I love the comparison in terms of the must-watch nature of the two stars, the flair in their games, the sense that you have to keep an eye on them at all times because the spectacular could happen any time they touch the ball. When the ball comes to them, everybody leads forward in their chairs. That is the sign of a real superstar.