Andrew Bogut

Report: Warriors, Bogut talking contract extension


Last season in the playoffs the Warriors defense was 7.8 points per 100 possessions better when Bogut was on the court and was the anchor in the paint. Look at it this way: When Bogut was on the court the Warriors defense was close to the Bulls regular season defensive numbers, when he sat they were close to the Hornets. While Stephen Curry was basking in the deserved spotlight, Golden State doesn’t get to the second round without Bogut.

Warriors management knows that, and this is a franchise that values the center position — remember they made the crazy offer to DeAndre Jordan that the Clippers had to match. They went after Dwight Howard this summer.

Now they are talking to Andrew Bogut about sticking around past this season, reports Scott Howard Cooper of Bogut is in the last year of his current deal at $14 million a year, and while he wants to stay he also wants his pound of flesh — or cash, in this case — for the team going after Howard.

The Warriors and Andrew Bogut have opened negotiations on a contract extension designed to keep him off the free-agent market in July, he told, with Bogut willing to make major concessions to stay but also looking for payback from management for pursuing Dwight Howard last offseason….

Bogut said the initial numbers from the Warriors, “weren’t insulting. But they weren’t what I’m looking for. Nothing concrete has been actually formally written up. We’ve just been going back and forth, but nothing too crazy.”

Two thoughts. First, it sounds like the two sides are starting the same ballpark, and that’s a good sign. For initial negotiations, that the numbers “weren’t insulting” is actually a positive. Bogut said he expects talks to heat up once the Warriors return from China this weekend, things could get done by the start of the season.

Second… how many years are the Warriors willing to give Bogut? The max they can add with an extension is three years. He will turn 29 this season, not old for a big man at all, but he has had a history of injuries keeping him in suits on the bench. Yes, they were fluky (especially the elbow injury) not chronic things, and Bogut worked hard to get back on the court, but you have to think about those future years or possible incentives in the deal. Bogut said in the story he’s not okay with an “Andrew Bynum” contract but would be open to incentives once he hits a certain number of games in a season.

Basically, it sounds like Bogut is going to get a deal worked out. It’s not a lock, but it sounds likely. It’s a gamble by the Warriors, but they made a gamble on Curry being able to stay healthy and that has paid off handsomely so far. Sounds like they will roll the dice again.

Report: Matt Barnes texted friend that he beat up Derek Fisher, spat in wife’s face

Derek Fisher, Matt Barnes, Russell Westbrook
1 Comment

Grizzlies forward Matt Barnes reportedly attacked Knicks coach Derek Fisher for dating his estranged wife, Gloria Govan.

New details are emerging, and they cast Barnes in an even worse light.

Ian Mohr of the New York Post:

Sources told The Post that Barnes became incensed when his 6-year-old twin sons, Carter and Isaiah, called to tell him that Fisher was at the house.

Following the dust-up, Barnes, 35, texted a pal that he had not only assaulted Fisher, 41, but also took revenge on Govan, one source said.

“I kicked his ass from the back yard to the front room, and spit in her face,” the text read, according to the source.

If this becomes a criminal case, Barnes’ text could incriminate him.

In the court of public opinion, the presence of Barnes’ children and his spitting in his wife’s face make this even more disturbing.

Unfortunately, not everyone views it that way. Too many are laughing off the incident.

Albert Burneko of Deadspin had the best take I’ve seen on this situation:

When an accused domestic abuser shows up uninvited at a family party to—as a source put it to the New York Post—“beat the shit” out of someone for the offense of dating his ex, that is not a wacky character up to zany shenanigans. It is not reality TV melodrama or a cartoon or celebrities being silly. It is the behavior of a dangerous misogynist lunatic. It is an act of violent aggression. It is a man forcefully asserting personal property rights over a woman’s home, body, and life. It differs from what Ray Rice did in that elevator by degree, not by kind, and not by all that much.

I suggest reading it in full.