Michael Jordan’s competitiveness hasn’t gone away.
NBA 2K14 hit store shelves today and with that 2KSports released a promotional video where they talked to Jordan about the competitive fire that drove him. That transitioned into questions of if Jordan thought could beat LeBron James or today’s other elite players one-on-one if he was still in his prime.
“I don’t think I would lose. Other than to Kobe Bryant because he steals all of my moves.”
What did you expect Jordan to say? Oh, and nice little dig at Kobe.
It’s a big hypothetical but I could see the argument that Jordan would beat LeBron one-on-one — Jordan was the better pure scorer. LeBron could be a bull getting to the rim, however both guys can defend. It comes down to this: If I need a guy to put the leather thing through the round thing, I’ll take MJ. And that’s what wins in on-on-one games.
If you want to make the argument LeBron is a better basketball player than Jordan, you argue for skills that do not help him in one-on-one games — passing, defending multiple positions, rebounding.
By the way, let me say this about the Jordan/LeBron comparisons (because that is where the comments will end up going anyway): There are two different arguments I think should be kept separate but get co-mingled. One is the resume argument — who has the better career accomplishments? Right now that is Jordan (LeBron is 29, we haven’t seen his full resume yet). LeBron may never win this battle, not only does Jordan have more rings but he came along at the right time with the right marketing behind him to become a cultural influence in a way LeBron could never duplicate. Nobody can. We’ll talk resumes when LeBron retires, but Jordan may well win the argument.
However, that is a separate argument from “who is the better player?” Resume is impacted by the players on your team and the quality of opponents, but who is the better player on the court is a barstool debate where you can argue either side (Jordan is the better scorer, LeBron has a better all-around game). This argument is a matter of opinion, although most people’s opinion will fall to the same side.
As if Golden State was not already a prohibitive favorite Saturday night.
DeMarcus Cousins, who has missed the last two games for Sacramento with a strained back and that will continue Saturday. Our old friend Bill Herenda tweeted it first.
Not only are the Kings 1-6 without Cousins, but they were also on their way to beating Charlotte Monday until Cousins had to leave the game.
Golden State will likely be without Harrison Barnes in this game after spraining his ankle in the last game. Expect Andre Iguodala to get the start, or if interim coach Luke Walton doesn’t want to mess with the bench rotation he could go with Brandon Rush.
Watching Anthony Davis fall to the court clutching his knee, not being able to put any pressure on his leg as he was helped to the locker room, it was frightening Friday night in Los Angeles.
It turns out it’s not that bad. After the game the injury was described as a “knee contusion” and not the serious damage that was feared. Saturday the Pelicans said Davis was good to go.
Whew. Nobody wants to see Davis miss time.
The Pelicans had won three in a row until they ran into the Clippers Friday night. Davis has played better of late — the New Orleans defense is 7.2 points per 100 better when he is on the court — and New Orleans has gotten better point guard play out of Ish Smith.
That is just cruel.
An on-fire Warriors team dropped 44 on the Suns in the first quarter Saturday, and Curry had 19 of those points going 5-of-6 from three. The Suns’ had no defender who could begin to hang with him. Certainly not Ronnie Price, who came in off the bench and got abused for his efforts.
Curry finished with 41 points, never had to set foot on the court in the fourth quarter, and the Warriors improved to 17-0 on the season. Just another day at the office for them.
We tend to think of record streaks having to be in one season, not broken up across two.
But if you can suspend that, the Philadelphia 76ers are now the owners of the longest losing streak in NBA — and major professional sports — history.
With their tough two-points loss to Houston Friday night, the Sixers have lost 27 in a row. The Sixers dropped their final 10 last season and with the loss to the Rockets are 0-17 to start this one.
That bests the 26-game losing streaks of the 2010-11 Cleveland Cavaliers and these same Sixers from 2013-14. Looking across sports, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers of 1976-1977 also lost 26 in a row, which when you consider the length of the NFL season is pretty embarrassing.
The Sixers struggles are born from a plan by GM Sam Hinkie (and approved by ownership) to get better long-term by being bad now and hoarding draft picks. It’s a strategy that can work if Hinkie nails the draft picks (the book is out on how Hinkie is doing on that front). And they are committed to it through at least this draft.
But don’t think for a second the players and coach are trying to lose.
If you have watched the Sixers play their last few games you know the players are trying hard to get that victory (and almost have a couple of times). The effort is there, they are just outmatched and lack the kind of presence at the end of games to execute under pressure (something a couple of quality, regularly-playing veterans might help, but that’s another discussion). They have the point differential of a team that should have a couple wins; they just haven’t been fortunate. It happens. Go ahead and blame management if you think this plan is an abomination. Just don’t question the desire or effort of the players or coaches, that is not in doubt.
The Sixers play at the Grizzlies Sunday, then have maybe their best shot at a win for a while when they host the Lakers on Tuesday.