The Lakers are done with World Peace.
As had been rumored for a while, the Lakers made it official on Thursday and amnestied Metta World Peace. That is not going to be popular with Lakers nation, who had grown to love the one guy who hustled and tried to play defense nightly even as the rest of the roster struggled.
World Peace now goes on waivers where any team under the salary cap can claim him for a portion of his existing salary (it’s a bidding process). If none of them grab him he becomes an unrestricted free agent and likely would sign with the New York Knicks (there is mutual interest).
This was a financial move for Los Angeles not a basketball move (he averaged 12.4 points a game with solid defense last season) — he was due $7.7 million next season but with the escalating luxury tax this saves the Lakers more than $14 million (they still have to pay him his salary but not the tax on that salary).
Still, this was not an easy decision or one that will be popular — Kobe Bryant had lobbied on twitter for the team to keep him. World Peace was the best player on the court in Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals and he was popular among teammates and fans. For all the flaws in his game, you could never question his desire.
“It’s tough to say goodbye to a player such as Metta, who has been a significant part of our team the past four seasons. For anyone who’s had the opportunity to get to know him, it’s impossible not to love him,” said Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak in a released statement. “He has made many contributions to this organization, both in his community work as well as in our games; perhaps no more so than in his clutch play in Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals in helping to lead us over the Celtics in one of the greatest playoff wins in Lakers history. We thank Metta for all his contributions and wish him the best of luck in the future.”
There are not a lot of threes on the Lakers roster; look for them to go small for stretches and play just acquired Nick Young there.
The Lakers might not even have a first-round pick this year.
Thanks to the ill-fated Steve Nash sign-and-trade, the Lakers owe the 76ers (via the Suns) a top-three-protected first-rounder. As the No. 2 seed in the lottery, the Lakers have just better than a coin-flip chance of landing in the top three and keeping the pick.
But if the Lakers land the top selection, they might not engage in the Ben Simmons-or-Brandon Ingram debate.
Colin Cowherd of Fox Sports:
Is this a good idea? The answer, as usual, is it depends on what they could get.
There’s a logic to adding another young player whose peak would align with Lakers’ core. D'Angelo Russell (20), Julius Randle (21) and Jordan Clarkson (23) aren’t ready to win. It might be better to add someone who will enter his prime when they do.
But the Lakers’ market and prestige make them a popular free-agent destination, and free agents value winning. Moderate improvements that would stick many teams on the mediocrity treadmill could open the door for the Lakers signing a star.
The Lakers should weigh these factors and trade offers logically and decide what to do if they get a top pick.
Of course, there are other factors. Jim Buss faces a somewhat-self-imposed deadline for contending. To the person in charge, what’s best for the franchise’s long-term outlook might not matter as much as a potential quick fix.
How tall is Kevin Durant?
He’s listed at 6-foot-9, but his teammates have guessed everything from 6-foot-10 to 7-foot-3.
Durant, via Chris Herring of The Wall Street Journal:
“For me, when I’m talking to women, I’m 7 feet,” he said. “In basketball circles, I’m 6-9.”
“But really, I’ve always thought it was cool to say I’m a 6-9 small forward,” he said. “Really, that’s the prototypical size for a small forward. Anything taller than that, and they’ll start saying, ‘Ah, he’s a power forward.’ ”
This mirrors Kevin Garnett, who Flip Saunders once called “6-foot-13” because Garnett didn’t want to get pigeonholed as a center.
But most height fudging in the NBA has players trying to be listed as taller. Read Herring’s piece for a fun look at the hijinks.
The Heat haven’t gotten past the Raptors. The Cavaliers haven’t toppled the Hawks, for that matter.
But can you imagine a Cleveland-Miami conference finals?
LeBron James can.
LeBron, via Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:
“I think naturally of course. That’s since I’ve came back,” James said. “It’d be great to play against those guys in the postseason. Throughout my whole career, I’ve always wanted to go against (Dwyane) Wade in a playoff series. We’ve always talked about it even before we became teammates in ’10. It’s not been heavy on my mind but it’s crossed my mind throughout my whole career.”
LeBron doesn’t realize how bad of an idea this is, which is what makes it such a bad idea.
It isn’t that the Heat are playing better than Toronto right now – though they are. It isn’t that the Heat are a tougher matchup for Cleveland than Toronto – though they are, routing the Cavs twice in three regular-season games (one of which LeBron didn’t play).
It’s that facing the Heat would bring a ridiculous level of drama to the series, and LeBron’s teammates are more equipped to face the Raptors and the fewer distractions that would come with that matchup.
LeBron just wants to be on the court with his friend, Dwyane Wade – with him or against him. I think LeBron can handle that, enjoy that and still produce.
But it undermines his teammate’s focus when LeBron does something like chat with Wade during halftime when they’re trying to prepare for the second half. It can bother teammates when even more attention than usual is placed on LeBron, who’d be THE storyline in a matchup with his old team.
If the Cavs had a choice – and they obviously don’t – they should avoid all that.
But the way the teams are playing, LeBron will probably get his wish.
Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson had a dumb idea about the Sonics.
So, he posted it to Twitter:
Yes, because this is how the NBA decides where to place teams.
Seattle’s City Council voted not to sell part of a street to Chris Hansen, essentially blocking a new arena – which is probably for the best. Why build a stadium when you might not even get a team? NBA commissioner Adam Silver says the league isn’t expanding anytime soon, and no franchise appears imminent to move.
But a petition could change all that do nothing – except rile up Wilson’s fans, no matter how detached the idea is from reality.