Miami Heat v San Antonio Spurs - Game Four

NBA Finals Game 5 Heat vs. Spurs preview: Which Heat team shows up?


SAN ANTONIO — Which Miami Heat team will be on the bus to the AT&T Center for Sunday night’s key Game 5?

We know what names will be there — LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, etc. — but the Heat have looked like a different team game to game in this series (and the last one, for that matter). There was the passive, jump shooting team that played Game 3 and got blown out. There was the small ball, aggressive team from Game 4 that played much better defense, forced turnovers, blocked shots and took control of the game in the fourth quarter.

The Spurs are going to be the Spurs — they are a model of consistency. They are going to come out in this game and defend, move the ball and for the most part play smart. The quality varies a little night to night, but you pretty much know what you are going to get — if Miami makes mistakes San Antonio will exploit them and win.

The question is will Miami make those mistakes or come out more like late in Game 4 and impose their will on the contest?

“So I think this team we’ve always responded to a challenge, and right now this is our challenge,” Wade said. “Our challenge now as a team is to see if we can put complete games together, back to back. So that’s got to be our challenge that we have to look forward to.”

As for Xs and Os, the Heat will come out starting Mike Miller again and going small.

“Against this team, we need to create space,” Miami’s Shane Battier said. “And just the threat of having three point shooters does that a little more. I think LeBron and Dwyane had a little bit more room to operate last game. And that’s what we’ve done all year, that’s why we’ve been a very good offense the entire year, league leading, is our ability to create space and make the other team make some tough decisions about their spacing.”

The Spurs will have to adjust, and that likely means a lot more Gary Neal and a lot less Tiago Splitter, possibly even in the starting lineup. But either way they Spurs need more out of Splitter, who had his shot blocked three times and turned it over a few other times in Game 4.

The other key is Tony Parker’s hamstring. It didn’t seem to bother him at all in the first half of Game 4, he was getting in the paint and putting on spin moves, and the game was tied at half. But in the second half a combination of more Heat defensive attention and his hamstring clearly bothering him, that penetration went away. And then the Heat and their defense took over. He says he’s fine, but…

There are no real secrets at this point in a series — these teams know each other well, it’s just a matter of execution. I think we know we will get that from the Spurs. The Heat were a confident bunch on Saturday, but we will see who gets off their team bus Sunday night.

As fans, I just hope we finally get another close game at the end, one that is entertaining to the final minutes (like Game 1).

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?