Chris Paul ,  Vinny Del Negro

Report: Chris Paul angry with Clippers because he’s blamed for Del Negro firing


Vinny Del Negro tried to avoid the question, but it was pretty clear he thought Chris Paul got him fired.

Clippers owner Donald Sterling all but came out and said the reason Del Negro is gone is Paul.

Paul says that is not the case at all — and he is pretty angry that he has been saddled with the blame for Del Negro being let go. That’s what a source told Chris Broussard of ESPN.

“He’s angry right now and his anger is directed toward the Clippers organization,” the source said. “Chris is a man of principle and if he feels like you’ve gone against his principles, it will affect how he feels about you. He’s very agitated that his name has been put out there as the reason for Vinny’s firing. He had nothing to do with it…

“Chris made it abundantly clear to the Clippers that he did not want to be involved in any decision about Vinny’s future,” the source said. “And Blake had nothing to do with it, either.”

Here is the only question that matters: Is this anger enough to push CP3 to another team? He is an unrestricted free agent July 1.

Maybe. But I doubt it in the end. He may well talk to other teams, but. I don’t think he’s leaving $28 million guaranteed on the table, and I don’t think he’s leaving a city he likes. Finally, I don’t think if he goes anywhere else he is going to be closer to a title than he is in Los Angeles.

As for the Del Negro firing and CP3’s involvement, it comes down to which side you believe. Do you really think Paul remained silent?

I think what Paul’s side leaked is his spin after feeling some mud fly his way. Things are not as simple and clean as the Clippers calling up CP3 and saying, “what do you want to do with the coach?” But no move is made without getting the feelings of him and Griffin on the matter. That said there were a lot of people in Clippers management that wanted Del Negro gone, this was far from a CP3 coup.

None the less I think CP3’s fingerprints are all over this. For a year now the Clippers have made front office moves — such as picking up Jamal Crawford and adding other veterans to the roster — at Paul’s suggestion. Owner Sterling really liked Del Negro personally. Despite what others wanted he would not have made this move if CP3 or someone tied to him didn’t nod in assent at the very least, if they didn’t give the emperor’s thumbs up or down.

This isn’t about something Sterling or anyone else said — we all knew already. Well, it didn’t help that Sterling threw him under the bus publicly. Still, you are the star of this team, the free agent they would do anything to keep, if you had said keep Del Negro he’d be here. You didn’t and he’s gone. That’s how it reads, like it or not.

Paul, this is what happens when you are a superstar free agent — you have all the power. Plenty of things come with that. It just is. I know you don’t want the reputation as a coach killer, but the fact is Magic Johnson and more superstars than you can name got a coach fired over the years. Nobody cares. Well, nobody cares long as you win — that is the source of your power. Win and all is ignored. Lose and it is not.

You will be consulted on the replacement — you don’t get to pick him but the team will ask your input. Give it. Then re-sign and move on. And win. If you do that all this is forgiven and forgotten by fans.


Kristaps Porzingis envelops Victor Oladipo’s dunk attempt (video)

Nikola Vucevic, Kristaps Porzingis
Leave a comment

Scott Skiles moved Victor Oladipo to the bench, because the Magic coach wanted to give Oladipo a chance to be more aggressive.

It worked.

Oladipo scored a season-high 24 points in the Magic’s 100-91 win over the Knicks.

But Oladipo’s aggressiveness also produced this fantastic Kristaps Porzingis block:

John Wall: Wizards shouldn’t have rested me and Bradley Beal together

Bradley Beal, John Wall
Leave a comment

The Wizards scored just six fourth-quarter points in their loss to the Hornets last night.

John Wall and Bradley Beal rested for the first 4:42 of that final period.

Wall, via Jorge Castillo of The Washington Post:

“I feel like we can’t have me and Brad sitting,” said Wall, who finished with 14 points on 6 for 18 shooting, with six assists, five rebounds and four turnovers. “That’s just my opinion. Coach makes the decision he feels is best for us. I just feel like one of us has to be in in that situation because when you’re on the road, this is the time when you can step on them.

“I just feel like one of us has to be in. I don’t know. It’s just my opinion because our second unit was just so stagnant. And I’m not saying they lost the game. [Shoot], we all lost the game. We didn’t make shots. We were 1 for 20, right? I think we were just so stagnant. We really didn’t have anybody penetrating and creating.”

First of all, this is how you disagree with a coach. Wall made clear that he respects Randy Wittman’s authority to set the rotation. Two adults should be allowed to acknowledge their differing opinions without it being labeled a feud.

But is Wall right?

Per nbawowy!, here are Washington’s offensive/defensive/net ratings with:

  • Wall and Beal: 103.0/105.0/-2.0 in 224 minutes
  • Wall without Beal: 110.0/111.2/-1.2 in 134 minutes
  • Beal without Wall: 80.2/116.8/-36.6 in 48 minutes
  • Neither Wall nor Beal: 105.2/101.6/+3.6 in 123 minutes

The Wizards have been much better with neither player on the court this season. They’ve also been a disaster when Beal plays without Wall.

But this is a relatively small sample. Let’s look back to last season.

  • Wall and Beal: 108.5/101.5/+7.0 in 1,715 minutes
  • Wall without Beal: 103.0/102.0/+1.0 in 1,123 minutes
  • Beal without Wall: 103.2/110.9/-7.7 in 384 minutes
  • Neither Wall nor Beal: 97.0/107.0/-10.0 in 768 minutes

Washington was – by far – at its best when Wall and Beal shared the court. They just complement each other so well. The Wizards were also fine with just Wall, bad with just Beal and even worse with neither.

If I were the Wizards, I’d generally chance resting Wall and Beal simultaneously so they can play more together. If I’m using just one, it’s Wall. Beal is not a creator I trust to run the offense, and Wall’s defense is important.

But there’s a limit on how much Wall (and Beal) can play. Wall got 36 minutes against Charlotte, and Beal played 38.

To the point, Wall and Beal played the final 7:18 – and the Wizards didn’t make a single basket in that span. They scored just two points on free throws. So, it’s hard to argue Wall and Beal were the answer.

Wittman blamed the players more than his substitutions.

Wittman, via J. Michael of CSN Mid-Atlantic:

“We don’t have guys that are making plays right now. Again, good looks but until we quit feeling sorry,” said Wittman, who could’ve gone this road after a 123-106 loss to the Indiana Pacers on Tuesday but didn’t. “When things go bad like that I had to twice in timeouts and tell them to lift their heads up. There’s plenty of time left. We’re up nine during this whole thing.  We start feeling sorry, start pouting putting our heads down and it becomes a snowball. We got to grow up in that aspect of it. If the shot doesn’t go in, it doesn’t go in.

“Makes, misses, that’s the game. You never give in. We haven’t gotten over that. That’s been that way for the last couple of years. Guys don’t play well, put their heads down and we pout, feel sorry for ourselves.”

When Wittman previously called out a player publicly, Marcin Gortat didn’t take it well. I’m not sure this will go any better.


When confronted with Wittman’s words, Bradley Beal only would shake his head before giving this retort: “I’m not going to comment on that.”

It’s uncharacteristic of the fourth-year shooting guard, who’ll usually give some sort of answer and shrug it off. By saying nothing, he’s staying plenty.

The Wizards, who entered the season a contender for the Eastern Conference finals, are 6-6. They’ve lost two straight, by 17 and 14 – and the end of their last defeat was historically dreadful.

Is this a team in turmoil?

Michael provides plenty of context to that question.

Chris Paul drops Rudy Gobert with stepback (and Gobert says why)

1 Comment

When Chris Paul recognized he got matched up with Rudy Gobert in transition, he slowed it down and set it up for an isolation — then used his step back to drop him to the ground and drain the open midrange. It’s one of the better highlight plays from the Clippers this season (and they have more than a few in Lob City).

Did CP3 push off on Gobert? Of course. Welcome to the NBA, every player who drives pushes off (including Gordon Hayward). It looked like to be Gobert tried to sell the contact and didn’t get the call he wanted.

However, after the game Gobert tweeted it was something else entirely.

Either way the Jazz got the win Wednesday night, 102-91, snapping a 13-game losing streak to the Clippers. The Jazz are .500 on the season with the win (7-7), while the Clippers drop back to below .500 (7-8) with some issues to sort out still.