San Antonio Spurs guard Green shoots against Memphis Grizzlies guard Conley during the first half of Game 1 of their NBA Western Conference final playoff basketball game in San Antonio

Spurs show they have too much offense for Grizzlies to handle in Game 1 destruction

4 Comments

In getting to the Western Conference Finals, the Grizzlies played two teams that couldn’t put together solid execution on the offensive end of the floor anywhere near consistently over the course of those playoff series.

A lot of the credit for that goes to the Memphis defense, of course. But in the first round, the Clippers relied too heavily on Chris Paul creating, and in the second round, the Thunder were without Russell Westbrook, and their offense was extremely one-dimensional with Kevin Durant being the only player that the Grizzlies needed to focus their efforts on stopping.

In this series against the Spurs, Memphis is facing a much more formidable opponent on the offensive end of the floor than they have to this point in these playoffs. And the results, at least during a 105-83 Game 1 shellacking, were cause for legitimate concern even after just one contest.

San Antonio has a roster loaded with players who understand how to run the team’s system to perfection, and they cycle through options effortlessly if the first one is stopped by the defense. There was a play very early in the game that illustrated this.

Tony Parker brought the ball up and tried the right side of the floor to begin his team’s possession. Danny Green popped out to the corner and received the pass, but with Tony Allen closely defending, he flipped it immediately back to Parker. Green doesn’t stand, however, he keeps moving, and cuts to the top of the arc to receive the pass so the Spurs can get into another one of their sets.

Parker then curls baseline all the way under the basket and around to the other side of the floor behind three staggered screens to attempt to free him from his defender. He receives the pass at the left elbow and initiates his dribble, before Tiago Splitter steps out to run a screen and roll. As both defenders stay with Parker, Splitter rolls and receives a perfect bounce pass from his point guard. Marc Gasol had to collapse to prevent the layup, which left Tim Duncan wide open from about eighteen feet out. Splitter makes the pass, and Duncan calmly drains the shot just as the shot clock expires.

That’s a lot to deal with defensively, and it’s much more than the Grizzlies have had to worry about recently.

It takes plenty of discipline to be perfect in your rotations, and the Grizzlies were without it for large stretches during their Game 1 loss. It’s one of the reason the Spurs were able to get loose for so many open looks from three-point distance, where they were able to shoot 14-of-29 for the game from downtown.

But make no mistake, that was by no means a fluky shooting performance or a random occurrence — the Spurs finished fourth in the league during the regular season in three-point shooting percentage, tied with the New York Knicks. We know they can knock down those shots at an above-average rate; the way the Grizzlies defended just gave them more opportunities than the Spurs are used to, and they were able to take advantage.

Memphis is typically a strong defensive team that can do a much better job in limiting its opponents. If there’s a bright side moving forward in this series, it’s that Grizzlies head coach Lionel Hollins believed a lot of what he saw was correctable.

“Tony Parker came out really aggressive, and then in pick and rolls we weren’t up where we were supposed to be,” Hollins said. “And he just beat us sometimes. And when Matt Bonner came in the game, he would set a screen and drag somebody away and we never got back.

“The main thing, we just over-helped. We were so hyper just running all over the place on defense. We’d have four guys in the paint, and then nobody would be out on the perimeter guarding anybody. And that’s not how we play defense.”

It’s true the Grizzlies defended much better in each of the first two rounds of the playoffs, but they weren’t faced with a team like the Spurs that executes to perfection for extended stretches, either. Memphis will make adjustments, and can be confident in remembering how they turned out to be just fine after dropping Game 1 in each of their two previous series victories. It will be much tougher this time to come back, however, given the precision with which the Spurs run their offense.

Pistons’ Stan Van Gundy “encouraged” by players speaking out, protesting social issues

CLEVELAND, OH - APRIL 17: Head coach Stan Van Gundy of the Detroit Pistons yells to his players during the first half of the NBA Eastern Conference quarterfinals against the Cleveland Cavaliers at Quicken Loans Arena on April 17, 2016 in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)  *** Local Caption ***Stan Van Gundy
Leave a comment

Athletes are injecting themselves into the needed national conversation about race, violence, and policing in this nation. That has taken some very public forms, including LeBron James, Chris Paul, Dwyane Wade and Carmelo Anthony speaking at the ESPYs, and Colin Kaepernick taking a knee during the national anthem and leading others to do so. Some NBA players likely will follow Kaepernick’s lead.

Pistons coach/GM Stan Van Gundy likes seeing players speak out.

A couple of his Detroit players — Reggie Jackson and Marcus Morris — said they backed the 49ers quarterback. Here is what the never shy Van Gundy said about all of it, via Vincent Ellis of the Detroit Free Press.

“I’m encouraged by the fact of what some of those guys stood up and did at the ESPYs and had a conversation,” Van Gundy said. “I’m really proud of the fact that we have guys that not only see the problem, but want to try to do something about it…

“To me, in some ways, (police brutality is) just the most visible to focus on and it goes to deeper inequities in our criminal justice system, our education system so there’s so much to focus on,” Van Gundy said. “I think it’s great that we have players that want to be part of that conversation, and a lot of players that want to go beyond the conversation and be part of the solution.”

Van Gundy has been telling his players part of that solution is to vote.

The players union and NBA sent out a release saying they wanted to work together to create positive change, but details are still vague on what that might be. The only thing we know for sure as we head into the NBA season — with as divided a nation and election as anyone can remember as a backdrop — is that some NBA players are going to try and keep the conversation going.

Sunday is 16th anniversary of greatest dunk ever: Vince Carter over Frederic Weis

Leave a comment

It was the last game of the group stage of the 2000 Olympic basketball tournament at the Sydney Olympics, the USA was taking on France, another USA win on its way to another gold medal.

But what we all remember is this one play — Vince Carter dunking over the 7’2″ French center Frederic Weis.

Best. Dunk. Ever.

By anyone.

Weis was never the same.

In an impressive career — two-time All-NBA, eight-time All-Star, hours and hours of crazy highlights — this is always going to be the highlight at the top of the list. So we will use the anniversary of this dunk to look at it one more time.

Hat tip to nitramy at NBA Reddit.

Hornets coach Steve Clifford suggests allowing teams to advance ball in final two minutes without timeout

Steve Clifford
AP Photo/Chuck Burton
Leave a comment

The final minutes of a close NBA game rank among the best moments in sports – which is pretty remarkable, considering frequent stoppages interrupt and impede enjoyment of the game.

Clutch play. Timeout. Clutch play. Timeout. Clutch play. Timeout.

Coaches should probably call fewer timeouts, because drawing up a play also allows the defense to set. But timeouts give the offense the option of advancing the inbound spot into the frontcourt, a key advantage. So, teams will keep calling timeouts.

Unless…

Steve Aschburner of NBA.com:

For Charlotte’s Steve Clifford, the ability in the final two minutes of a game to advance the ball without requiring a timeout to be called could speed up the action. That has been used on a trial basis in the D League and in Summer League, and several coaches felt it worked well.

“The game is at an all-time high in popularity, but a lot of people complain about the last two minutes,” Clifford said. “I think it would add a different dimension but it would also be a good thing in addressing our biggest issue.”

Not that the coaches would be willing to lose any of their timeouts, though. They just wouldn’t save them specifically for that purpose.

I’m here for that.

I’m unsurprised control-seeking coaches want to keep all their timeouts, and reducing those seems unlikely, anyway. The NBA pays its bills through commercial breaks.

Would moving those advertising opportunities earlier in the game pay off? Audiences are probably larger in crunch time, but an action-packed closing stretch could hook fans and grow overall audiences. It’s always a difficult decision to forgo maximizing immediate revenue in pursuit of more later.

But I’m fairly certain fans would appreciate the change, which is at least a starting point in considering it.

Kyrie Irving feels validated after hitting game-winning shot to bring title to Cleveland

2 Comments

Back in July during the pre-Olympics USA Camp in Las Vegas, I asked Kyrie Irving what had changed for him, what was different for him after winning an NBA title. His answer was about the doors it opened, the possibilities that suddenly felt available to him. A month after winning the title he still seemed a little overwhelmed by the experience, and he hadn’t fully processed it yet. Which is completely understandable.

Now, as training camp is set to open for the Cavaliers and their defense of that title, Irving clearly has gotten used to being a champion — and he feels validated. Look at what he told Joe Varden of the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

“Yes, my life’s changed drastically,” Irving told cleveland.com Saturday, during Irving’s friendship walk and basketball challenge downtown for Best Buddies, Ohio — an organization that gives social growth and employment opportunities to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“It’s kind of, you’re waiting for that validation from everyone, I guess, to be considered one of the top players in the league at the highest stage,” Irving said. “That kind of changed. I was just trying to earn everyone’s respect as much as I could.”

It’s amazing to think of the impact one shot — Irving’s three over Stephen Curry with 53 seconds left in Game 7 — can have. If he misses, there is less pressure on the Warriors to answer with a three, maybe they come down and get a bucket inside for two (one could argue they should have done that anyway rather than hunt for the three), from there maybe the Warriors win. If so, that could change everything from Kevin Durant‘s summer plans to what the Cavaliers’ roster looks like today — there’s a good chance Cleveland’s lineup would have changed if they lost to the Warriors two Finals in a row.

One shot can have that kind of impact on a player, too.

Kyrie Irving was one of the top five point guards in the NBA for a while, a score first guy but one who had some floor general in him and got some steals. A lot of time seemed to be spent focusing on his flaws defensively and passing. But with that shot, he feels validated. If he carries that confidence into next season, the Cavaliers just got better.