San Antonio Spurs guard Green shoots against Memphis Grizzlies guard Conley during the first half of Game 1 of their NBA Western Conference final playoff basketball game in San Antonio

Spurs show they have too much offense for Grizzlies to handle in Game 1 destruction

4 Comments

In getting to the Western Conference Finals, the Grizzlies played two teams that couldn’t put together solid execution on the offensive end of the floor anywhere near consistently over the course of those playoff series.

A lot of the credit for that goes to the Memphis defense, of course. But in the first round, the Clippers relied too heavily on Chris Paul creating, and in the second round, the Thunder were without Russell Westbrook, and their offense was extremely one-dimensional with Kevin Durant being the only player that the Grizzlies needed to focus their efforts on stopping.

In this series against the Spurs, Memphis is facing a much more formidable opponent on the offensive end of the floor than they have to this point in these playoffs. And the results, at least during a 105-83 Game 1 shellacking, were cause for legitimate concern even after just one contest.

San Antonio has a roster loaded with players who understand how to run the team’s system to perfection, and they cycle through options effortlessly if the first one is stopped by the defense. There was a play very early in the game that illustrated this.

Tony Parker brought the ball up and tried the right side of the floor to begin his team’s possession. Danny Green popped out to the corner and received the pass, but with Tony Allen closely defending, he flipped it immediately back to Parker. Green doesn’t stand, however, he keeps moving, and cuts to the top of the arc to receive the pass so the Spurs can get into another one of their sets.

Parker then curls baseline all the way under the basket and around to the other side of the floor behind three staggered screens to attempt to free him from his defender. He receives the pass at the left elbow and initiates his dribble, before Tiago Splitter steps out to run a screen and roll. As both defenders stay with Parker, Splitter rolls and receives a perfect bounce pass from his point guard. Marc Gasol had to collapse to prevent the layup, which left Tim Duncan wide open from about eighteen feet out. Splitter makes the pass, and Duncan calmly drains the shot just as the shot clock expires.

That’s a lot to deal with defensively, and it’s much more than the Grizzlies have had to worry about recently.

It takes plenty of discipline to be perfect in your rotations, and the Grizzlies were without it for large stretches during their Game 1 loss. It’s one of the reason the Spurs were able to get loose for so many open looks from three-point distance, where they were able to shoot 14-of-29 for the game from downtown.

But make no mistake, that was by no means a fluky shooting performance or a random occurrence — the Spurs finished fourth in the league during the regular season in three-point shooting percentage, tied with the New York Knicks. We know they can knock down those shots at an above-average rate; the way the Grizzlies defended just gave them more opportunities than the Spurs are used to, and they were able to take advantage.

Memphis is typically a strong defensive team that can do a much better job in limiting its opponents. If there’s a bright side moving forward in this series, it’s that Grizzlies head coach Lionel Hollins believed a lot of what he saw was correctable.

“Tony Parker came out really aggressive, and then in pick and rolls we weren’t up where we were supposed to be,” Hollins said. “And he just beat us sometimes. And when Matt Bonner came in the game, he would set a screen and drag somebody away and we never got back.

“The main thing, we just over-helped. We were so hyper just running all over the place on defense. We’d have four guys in the paint, and then nobody would be out on the perimeter guarding anybody. And that’s not how we play defense.”

It’s true the Grizzlies defended much better in each of the first two rounds of the playoffs, but they weren’t faced with a team like the Spurs that executes to perfection for extended stretches, either. Memphis will make adjustments, and can be confident in remembering how they turned out to be just fine after dropping Game 1 in each of their two previous series victories. It will be much tougher this time to come back, however, given the precision with which the Spurs run their offense.

Steve Kerr on Stephen Curry: “it’s not an injury”

1 Comment

In the age of social media and spin, the idea of a nuanced answer — where there is some truth to a statement, but it is not the only reason for something — gets drowned out.

For example, let’s take the case of Stephen Curry‘s below-par performance against the Oklahoma City Thunder (he was 6-of-20 shooting with six turnovers in Game 4 and is 5-of-21 from three in the last two games). A report came out Wednesday morning saying Curry was only 70 percent following his knee surgery, which first led to a lot of silly “excuses” comments on Twitter. This led to Steve Kerr denying the injury, via Ben Bolch of the Los Angeles Times.

Here’s a radical idea: Curry’s struggles are a combination of things.

Yes, the improved, athletic, and lengthy Thunder defense is giving Curry problems. They are meeting him out high, often doubling off the pick-and-roll, and when that pick is set by Draymond Green Kevin Durant and his length is doing a great job of blowing that play up. Also, it is clear the physical exertion of guarding Russell Westbrook is wearing Curry down.

But also, he has lacked the explosiveness we saw lift him to a second consecutive MVP during the season. He’s had great quarters — the fourth and OT in Game 4 vs. Portland, and the second quarter of Game 2 vs. OKC — but he has not been the consistent force we are used to seeing.

Welcome to the playoffs, where if someone is a little bit off that gets exploited by the other team.

That is what is going on, the rest is just spin.

Frank Vogel says it would be “inaccurate” to say he begged for his job with Pacers

TORONTO, ON - MAY 01:  Head Coach Frank Vogel of the Indiana Pacers looks on in the first half of Game Seven of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals against the Toronto Raptors during the 2016 NBA Playoffs at the Air Canada Centre on May 01, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Vaughn Ridley/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

This is all moot now. Frank Vogel has landed on his feet with a promising young Orlando team; Nate McMillan slid up a chair to take over the head coaching job in Indiana (which is an odd hire if Larry Bird wants the Pacers to play faster). But…

Frank Vogel wants you to know he did not beg for his job.

At the post-firing press conference of Pacers’ coach Larry Bird, he said that Vogel basically begged for his job. Vogel, speaking on ESPN Indianapolis Radio’s Dan Dakich Show Tuesday, via the Indianapolis Star:

Larry’s going to speak his mind. A lot of people talked to me about it who didn’t like that and it’s probably an inaccurate perception that I was begging him to stay. … I fully respect Larry and the process. He knew it was going to be an unpopular move but he did what he had to do.

“I felt like we were on the verge of some big things. We stood toe-to-toe with a 56-win team. I told my team after the series that were poised … I felt like I was going to be able to do that with this group. That was my only mention to Larry.”

Again, this is all moot.

The reality is Vogel was never Bird’s guy, Bird wanted the Pacers to play faster than they did last season (11th in the NBA in pace), and Bird thought it time for a change. He’s the team president, it’s his call.

But did Bird make the Pacers better with this move? Begging discussion aside, that is the question to which he must answer.

Kobe Bryant texts Draymond Green, says making history is not easy

2 Comments

The Golden State Warriors made history — they won 73 games, more than any team in NBA history.

But they are on the verge of being remembered like the 2007 Patriots.

The Warriors are down 3-1 to the Thunder for a variety of reasons — the Thunder defense has been exceptional, Russell Westbrook is a beast, for whatever reason Stephen Curry is not playing like MVP Stephen Curry — but there is another key one:

Draymond Green has played like crap the last couple games.

Kobe Bryant, who relates to Green’s drive and intensity, texted him a message according to Sportando:

That reflects Kobe’s world view.

It may be very different from the Warriors’ reality — even if Curry and Green were back to playing at their peak, it very well might be a coin toss with this Thunder team playing at their peak. The struggles of those two — Green has turned the ball over, missed shots, and missed defensive rotations for two games — have a lot to do with the quality of play of that Thunder defense.

But if the Warriors can come back and win the series (and the title), it will add to their legend.

Report: Grizzlies offer David Fizdale head coaching job

Bulls Heat Basketball
Leave a comment

This is a quality hire, a respected long-time NBA assistant who has deserved a shot in the big chair.

But is he an upgrade over Dave Joerger?

Apparently the Grizzlies are betting that Miami Heat assistant coach David Fizdale is the man they need. From Adrian Wojnarowski of The Vertical at Yahoo Sports.

Casual fans may not know his name, but this could be a good hire for Memphis. Fizdale is an assistant coach with a quality franchise who has paid his dues and deserves a chance. For example, in Miami Fizdale had won the trust and respect of a team full of players that had won rings. He was a guy they leaned on. As an example, Fizdale worked hard with LeBron James on developing a post game; he was the guy LeBron trusted.

But how will he deal with an aging roster that lacks shooting? The Memphis job is a good one, but it has its challenges.