New York Knicks v Miami Heat

Boston Globe’s Gary Washburn defends his lone vote for ‘Melo for MVP


LeBron James received 120 of the 121 first place votes for MVP — he was one vote short of being the first ever unanimous pick.

The person who cast the lone dissenting vote was the very good, very well respected NBA writer for the Boston Globe Gary Washburn, who defended his vote Monday in the paper.

Secondly, this isn’t the Best Player in the Game award, it’s the Most Valuable Player award, and I think what Anthony accomplished this season was worthy of my vote. He led the Knicks to their first division title in 19 years.

That’s a long time ago.

Anthony led the league in scoring average and basically carried an old Knicks team to the No. 2 seed in the Eastern Conference. Amar’e Stoudemire missed most of the season with knee issues, Raymond Felton missed six weeks, and Tyson Chandler dealt with nagging injuries, leaving Anthony, J.R. Smith, and a bunch of lottery picks from the mid-1990s to win 54 games and beat the Miami Heat three times.

This is a fair argument, and while not one I fully agree with he certainly is within his bounds to make it and cast that vote. It’s not like Washburn voted for J.J. Hickson or something, Anthony came in third and was a legitimate MVP candidate. Frankly, I’d rather hear the explanation of the nine voters who left Anthony out of their top five completely.

And the league intentionally does not define MVP for the voters — you can vote for the best player in the game, the guy you think who was most important to his team, the best player on the best team, or however else you wish to define most valuable. I think for most voters this definition is more art than science — they know what the MVP is when they see it. And it’s a combination of all those definitions.

The idea that the league or anyone else didn’t want LeBron to be unanimous is bunk — for one Washburn is not the kind of guy swayed by that stuff. He voted his conscience.

I think LeBron deserved it for a tremendous season lifting a good team to the best record in the NBA, to a level where they won 27 in a row and were dominant. To me Anthony had his best season ever, however, and will agree that without him this Knicks roster is in a lot of trouble this past season. And remember, the votes are for the regular season — Anthony’s playoff struggles (against defenses overloaded to stop him) do not matter in the voting.

Just like people often say with politics, I don’t agree with Washburn’s vote but I’ll defend his right to cast it.

But this makes you wonder about past voting — Michael Jordan was never unanimous? Kareem Abdul-Jabbar? Wilt Chamberlain? Washburn is not Fred Hickman (the broadcaster’s one vote in 2000 cost Shaquille O’Neal a unanimous win, Hickman voted for Allen Iverson) he was a guy voting what he saw and believed.

And he had the courage to defend it publicly. Good on him. Now we can all move on to the games and things that really matter in basketball.

Mark Cuban suggests supplemental draft for undrafted free agents

Mark Cuban
Leave a comment

A lot of people around the NBA have ideas to improve the draft, free agency and the D-League, and Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has never been shy about sharing his. His latest idea seems pretty logical: a supplemental draft for undrafted free agents.

Via Hoops Rumors:

“I would have a supplemental draft every summer for undrafted free agents of the current and previous 3 years,” Cuban wrote in an email to Hoops Rumors. “If you are more than 3 years out you are not eligible and just a free agent.”

The supplemental draft would have two rounds, and teams would hold the rights to the players they select for two years, Cuban added. Players can opt out and choose not to make themselves eligible, but those who get picked would receive fully guaranteed minimum-salary contracts when they sign, according to Cuban’s proposal.

“That would make it fun a few weeks after the draft and pre-summer league,” Cuban wrote. “It would prevent some of the insanity that goes on to build summer league rosters.”

It’s an interesting proposition. Most undrafted players who sign during the summer don’t get guaranteed contracts, so when deciding to enter this supplemental draft, they would have to weigh the value of having guaranteed money versus getting to decide where they sign. It’s unlikely that anything like this could happen anytime soon, because of all the hoops to jump through to get the league and the players’ union to sign off on it, but it’s a worthwhile idea that deserves some consideration in the next CBA negotiations.