Pacers center Hibbert, West and George celebrate as they walk off the court after defeating the Atlanta Hawks in their first-round Eastern Conference playoff NBA basketball game in Atlanta

Ice cold shooting Hawks freeze themselves out of playoffs with 81-73 loss to Pacers


It wasn’t pretty.

Not this series, not Game 6 where the winning team had an offensive rating of 86 points per 100 possessions (the worst offense in the NBA this season was the Wizards at 97 per 100… this was that bad).

But in both Game 6 and the series the Indiana Pacers were the better team and they finally broke the string of blowout wins by home teams in this series, knocking off the Hawks 81-73 to advance to the second round.

Indiana opens their second round playoff series against the Knicks on Sunday at Madison Square Garden. The Hawks can start booking flights to Mexico for vacation.

When you’re looking for reasons the Hawks lost this game, start in the second quarter — in a series with some ugly stretches this was the flat out worst of them all. Atlanta shot 1-of-15 in the second quarter, and that loan basket came with more than 10 minutes to go off a Kyle Korver jumper. The Pacers are a good defensive team, but the Hawks helped out by just being bad.

The Pacers weren’t much better, shooting 7-of-22 in the quarter, but they won it 16-9. Well, won is the wrong word. They survived it in better shape.

Then the Pacers went on a 13-2 run early in the fourth quarter and pushed the lead to 19, with David West (10 points in the quarter) and George Hill (12 in the quarter) leading the way. West finished with 21 points (on 21 shots), Hill had 21.

The Hawks chipped away at the lead, making a game of it after a 17-4 fourth quarter run. Josh Smith had 7 of his 14 points on the night in the fourth (but he needed 16 points to get there.

When Al Horford threw down a dunk with 2:41 left it was a three point game and the often quiet crowd at Phillips Arena was rocking. But they had little to cheer about the rest of the way. First West got a bucket to make it five, then the Hawks went cold again. The scored stayed at 78-73 and you could feel another Josh Smith three point attempt coming — and West blocked that.

Then you knew.

The Hawks are going to be shaken up this summer — Josh Smith is a free agent and I wouldn’t bet on his return. GM Danny Ferry has seen enough of this iteration of Atlanta basketball and will remake the roster around Al Horford.

The Pacers move on to face the Knicks in a battle of strength on strength — the Pacers defense against the Knicks offense. But the question is can the Pacers score enough to win? They didn’t have to in Game 6 against the Hawks, they will in New York.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?