Steve Nash says he wants Dwight Howard back with the Lakers

35 Comments

The biggest question facing the Lakers this summer isn’t the health of Kobe Bryant, and if he’ll be able to make it back in time for the start of next season.

Undoubtedly, it’s whether or not Dwight Howard will decide to return to Los Angeles.

Bryant is the Lakers’ most important player, obviously. But next season will be his 18th in the league, so he’s likely to only be around for another couple of years at most. Howard, meanwhile, is in the prime of his career, and has the option to sign a max contract that will keep him in purple and gold for the next five seasons.

The Lakers want to build around Howard moving forward into its post-Bryant era, and they need an All-Star level player just like him who would embrace being the future face of the franchise. Most see the combination of the team and its big market city as a perfect situation for Howard to settle into for the long haul, and that includes Steve Nash.

From Mike Bresnahan of the Los Angeles Times:

“I’m very hopeful that Dwight will be back,” Nash said Monday. “I think this is the place for him. He’s in the prime of his career. He’s got his best years ahead of him. He can play for one of the greatest franchises in sports and an amazing city. This has got to be the place for him and I’m hopeful that he sees it that way.”

Howard, 27, becomes a free agent in July, able to sign a five-year, $118-million deal with the Lakers or a four-year, $88-million deal with someone else.

While the $30 million difference in guaranteed money may seem like an incentive to stay (and it is), it won’t be the main factor in Howard’s decision.

Playing for the Lakers is anything but easy, given the championship level of expectations that are rightfully heaped upon the players’ shoulders season after season. The team does everything it can to assemble a roster capable of winning a championship every single year, and as we saw this season, when things aren’t going as planned, it can be especially draining for the team’s superstars.

Howard said this year was “like a nightmare,” remember, so whether or not he wants to deal with the possibility of failed expectations in Los Angeles — where every season is literally championship or bust — will weigh heavily in his decision.

As for Nash, of course he wants Howard back. He came to Los Angeles to try to be a part of a championship contender, and having a dominant rim-protecting presence inside would certainly be a key component in the Lakers once again achieving that level of success.

Are Bulls and Dwyane Wade moving toward a buyout?

Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Leave a comment

About a month ago, the Bulls said they hadn’t discussed a buyout with Dwyane Wade.

Have the two sides progressed since?

Nick Friedell of ESPN:

Dwyane Wade isn’t long for the organization’s future and is expected to reach a buyout agreement at some point in the next few months.

Expected by whom?

People with direct knowledge of momentum toward a buyout?

Or everyone who can see that a 35-year-old earning $23.8 million fits poorly on a rebuilding team?

For the Bulls to now drop their biggest name and a large expiring contract that could prove useful in trades should require Wade surrendering a large portion of his salary. He doesn’t sound like someone inclined to do that yet.

A few months is a long time. As long as Wade gets bought out by March 1, he could join another team’s playoff roster. It’d surprise nobody if he gets bought out after the February trade deadline, which we already knew. I don’t see strong indication of something more imminent.

LeBron James’ camp already shooting down leaving-Cavaliers rumor

AP Photo/Tony Dejak
Leave a comment

LeBron James has done a terrible job shooting down rumors about him leaving the Cavaliers

Except this one from Chris Sheridan, who cited a source saying LeBron would “100 percent” leave Cleveland next summer due to a rift with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert.

Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:

Sheridan’s source saying LeBron is leaving doesn’t make that true. But other anonymous sources denying it doesn’t make the denials true, either.

New Orleans Saints fire Pelicans’ team physician

Thomas B. Shea/Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Pelicans have been crushed by injuries the last few years.

Why? That’s an incredibly complex question.

But the New Orleans Saints – who share an owner (Tom Benson), a front-office leader (Mickey Loomis) and other staff with the Pelicans – have found culprits for their own injury woes.

Mike Triplett of ESPN:

The Saints have fired team orthopedists Deryk Jones and Misty Suri, per source, after it was discovered that CB Delvin Breaux has a fractured fibula and will require surgery expected to sidelined him for 4-6 weeks. Breaux was originally diagnosed with a contusion

Suri is a Pelicans team physician.

Scott Kushner of The Advocate:

Fairly or not, Suri – after the Saints deemed him unacceptable – will be in the crosshairs if he keeps his job with the the Pelicans and their injury woes continue.

Rumor: LeBron James ‘100 percent’ leaving Cavaliers next summer

Ezra Shaw/Getty Images
5 Comments

Chris Sheridan was ahead of the crowd in 2014, reporting LeBron James would likely leave the Heat for the Cavaliers – which obviously happened.

But Sheridan called it a “90 percent chance,” a small – but large enough – hedge. He also said LeBron would announce the decision on LeBron’s personal website. Of course, LeBron revealed his choice in a Sports Illustrated essay.

So, maybe Sheridan knows what he’s talking about. Maybe he doesn’t.

But the longtime NBA writer just fanned the flames of the already hot LeBron-leaving-Cleveland rumors.

Sheridan:

Of course, the denials came quickly.

There have already been plenty of warning signs about LeBron’s relationship with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert, which didn’t restart in a great place.

It’s entirely believable LeBron would leave Cleveland, in large part due to Gilbert.

But it’s also fun to speculate about that salacious storyline.

Maybe Sheridan or his source got carried away for that very reason. Or maybe they know something.

Neither possibility should be discounted.