Chicago Bulls' Robinson goes the the basket against New York Knicks' Anthony during the overtime of their NBA basketball game in Chicago, Illinois

Bulls end Knicks’ win streak behind inspired play of Nate Robinson and Jimmy Butler

41 Comments

On Dec. 18, K.C. Johnson of the Chicago Tribune reported the Knicks were considering waiving Nate Robinson. That same day, Butler scored six points to raise his season scoring average.

Tonight, Robinson and Butler led the hard-playing, hard-charging, hard-celebrating Bulls to a 118-111 overtime win over the Knicks, whose 13-game win streak ended the same place the Heat’s 27-game win streak did: Chicago. The Bulls (43-35) now have sole possession of the No. 5 seed over the Hawks (43-36) thanks to their one-time unlikely heroes.

Robinson scored 35 points in 33 minutes, his highest-scoring game since he played for the Knicks three years ago. His outside shot was impressive. His drives to the basket were fruitful. And his swagger was out of this world:

Butler played all 48 minutes against the Raptors on Tuesday, and then he played even more tonight (50 minutes). He finished with 22 points and 14 rebounds and added three steals and three blocks in excellent of Carmelo Anthony.

Melo scored more than 35 points for the sixth straight game, but he needed 34 shots, more than he’s taken in any other game during the streak. The problem wasn’t just efficiency for the Knicks. It was also fatigue.

They took 104 shots tonight, their most since Mike Mike D’Antoni’s first season, and by the time regulation ended, they seemed done.

After the Knicks turned the ball over to begin overtime, they missed from 21, 26, 26, 8 and 26 feet. Between, they shot twice near the hoop, but those attempts were as likely to end in blocks as baskets. It looked like the Bulls had worn down the Knicks will to find good shots.

The narrative says the Bulls are now the streak stoppers, and they did end the Heat’s win streak. But the Clippers’ 17-game and Nuggets’ 15-game streaks were long than the Knicks’ this season, and neither was snapped by Chicago. The real story is that, even in games the opponent wants to win badly, the Bulls play harder.

That won’t matter quite as much when the playoffs begin and every team plays closer to 100 percent intensity, but on two highly watched nights this season, Chicago was the perfect foil to two of the NBA’s hottest teams.

NBA: Kenneth Faried got away with foul on decisive basket in Nuggets’ win over Bulls

1 Comment

The Bulls’ biggest loss Friday was Jimmy Butler to injury. His absence certainly contributed to a loss to the Timberwolves the following night.

But Chicago also lost to the Nuggets on Friday, and perhaps that wouldn’t have happened if the game were called correctly down the stretch.

With Denver up two points and 21.1 seconds remaining, Kenneth Faried offensively rebounded a free throw and scored. The Bulls then intentionally fouled down the stretch, and Faried and Danilo Gallinari added a few free throws in the Nuggets’ 115-110 win.

One problem: Faried should’ve been called for offensively fouling Taj Gibson on the key putback, according to the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report:

Faried (DEN) extends his arm into Gibson (CHI) and dislodges him, affecting his ability to retrieve the rebound.

This was a huge swing. Instead of Taj Gibson – a 69% career free-throw shooter – going to the line for two attempts with Chicago down two points, Faried put the Nuggets up four. Even if Gibson split at the line, the Bulls would have been in significantly better shape.

As usual, we can’t know what would’ve happened if this call were made correctly. But it significantly set back Chicago.

NBA considering if jump-on-back foul should be flagrant foul

Leave a comment

The video above is an intentional foul — Chris Paul jumped on the back of Dwight Howard. The same thing has happened to Andre Drummond.

Is it a flagrant foul?

The Boston Celtics tweeted this out on Sunday.

The NBA was quick to let people know that this is just something under consideration — there has been no change in the rules. This may well be where the league is headed, but it’s not there yet.

The NBA defines a flagrant foul as “unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent.” To me, leaping on a player’s back like that qualifies. (A flagrant two foul is “unnecessary and excessive contact” and leads to an ejection; this is not that.)

Jared Dudley — one of the more vocal players on union issues — added a good point.

Consider this part of the coming changes on the intentional fouling rules period. But this one tweak could come much faster.

NBA: Foul on Cavaliers that sparked Celtics’ comeback called in error

Cleveland Cavaliers' J.R. Smith makes a move on Boston Celtics' Evan Turner (11) during the third quarter of a NBA basketball game in Boston Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)
4 Comments

The Cavaliers were in great shape against the Celtics on Friday, leading by four points with seven seconds left.

Then, it all went so wrong for Cleveland.

J.R. Smith was called for fouling Evan Turner on a made layup, cutting the margin to two points. Turner missed the free throw, but the ball went out of bounds off the Cavs. Then, Avery Bradley made a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to give Boston the win.

Rewind, though, and an incorrect call drove the sequence, according to the NBA.

Smith shouldn’t have been called for fouling Turner, per the Last Two Minute Report:

Smith (CLE) makes incidental contact with Turner’s (BOS) body as he attempts the layup.

If this were officiated correctly, the Cavs would’ve had the ball and a two-point lead with 5.9 seconds left. That’s not a lock to win – they’d still have to inbound the ball and make their free throws – but it’s close.

Cleveland is definitely entitled to feel the refs wronged them out of a victory.

Report: Kevin Durant has “done his due diligence on the Bay Area”

4 Comments

Kevin Durant has not made up his mind about what he will do as a free agent this summer. Until his playoff run ends, whenever that may be for the Thunder, his focus will be on bringing a title to Oklahoma City.

But even he admits he can’t help but think about free agency a little.

The buzz around the league is Golden State is at the front of the line if Durant decides to leave OKC, and he has done some research, reports Marc Spears of Yahoo Sports.

The Warriors play in front of an intimidating Oracle Arena crowd and are expected to debut a new San Francisco arena in 2019. Durant has quietly done his due diligence on the Bay Area, too, sources told Yahoo Sports.

His people — specifically agent Rich Kleiman and personal manager Charlie Bell — would be stupid not to have done some research on not only Golden State but on every other team he might consider: Houston, Miami, Washington, both teams in Los Angeles, the Knicks, and on down the line. Golden State, playing with Stephen Curry, certainly would have its attractions.

I’m still in the camp that Durant signs a 1+1 deal to stay in Oklahoma City (meaning he can opt out after one more season, in 2017), and it’s all about the cash. While he could get 30 percent of a $90 million cap this summer (about $27 million a season to start), with one more year of service in 2017 Durant could get 35 percent of $108 million ($37.8 million to start). That’s a lot of cash. Plus he gets one more chance at a ring with Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka, who both are 2017 free agents.

But you can be sure whatever Durant decides, it will be well researched and thought out. And he’s not going to announce it in a live special on ESPN.