Seattle SuperSonics v Denver Nuggets

Sacramento, Seattle groups make formal pitch to owners Wednesday


The decision on where the Kings tip off their games next season will partially be decided in a Manhattan hotel conference on Wednesday.

Groups representing both the Seattle group that has a deal to purchase the Kings with plans to move them north, and the Sacramento group looking to keep the Kings in town, are making pitches to as many as a dozen current NBA owners, the members of the combined sale and relocation committees of the Board of Governors.

The final decision on the Kings sale — if the Maloof family can sell to the Seattle group and if the team can move — will be voted on by the full Board of Governors (the NBA owners) when they meet April 18. However, the recommendations of this joint committee looking into the details will go a long way in influencing the owners on that vote.

The Seattle Group is led by hedge fund manager Chris Hansen and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. They have an agreement to purchase 65 percent of the team, which is valued at $525 million, and have applied for relocation. The team would play in the Key Arena in Seattle for a few seasons while a new arena is constructed (it is in environmental review). David Stern has called this a very strong offer — a lot of money behind it, arena plans underway, a basketball-hungry market (44,000 people already pledged to buy season tickets) with great demographics, a bigger (and wealthier) media market, and a great NBA history.

But Sacramento, led by Mayor Kevin Johnson, has put together a strong counter offer. By bringing in billionaire Vivek Ranadive to go with 24-Hour Fitness owner to lead a group buying the team, and with Ron Burkle behind a deal to get a new arena done in downtown Sacramento, Johnson has put together a counter offer that they say matches the money and arena of Seattle. He also got the Sacramento City Council to agree to $258 million in investment in the arena plans (to be paid off through parking fees and other services).

Sacramento’s best card to play is simply this — other NBA owners of middle to small market teams will ask their cities for money and help getting a new arena built in the next decade, with the threat of losing the team as the leverage (something every pro sports league does). If Sacramento does everything right and still loses the team, what happens to that leverage?

Seattle’s group can say they have a sale agreement in place, that they are a strong ownership group and that the NBA brass has wanted to return to the Seattle market since the Sonics left to become the Thunder.

If you’re thinking expansion, David Stern has shot that down because a majority of owners are opposed. That idea is dead.

While we will get statements all around on Wednesday from both sides, what really matters is what leaks out of owners and that committee in the coming days and weeks leading up to the April 18 big votes. Look for this to be essentially decided before all the owners get in the same room together.

Thabo Sefolosha found not guilty

Thabo Sefolosha
Leave a comment

Thabo Sefolosha clearly believed in his innocence.

The Hawks wing rejected a plea deal of only day of community service and six months probation. That probably would have been easier than a trial.

But Sefolosha opted to fight the charges – misdemeanor obstructing government administration, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.

Today, he was vindicated.

Robert Silverman:

Sefolosha, who missed the playoffs due to a leg injury that seemingly occurred during his arrest, has made his case clear: New York police targeted him because he’s black. Given everything else we know about policing habits, that’s certainly believable.

We’ve also seen video of multiple officers literally pulling Sefolosha in different directions and one striking him in the leg with a nightstick. We don’t know what preceded that video, but especially given the information revealed at trial, it’s difficult to justify that use of force.

This verdict probably sets up Sefolosha’ to sue the NYPD.

Report: Some Hawks executives doubt Danny Ferry’s contrition

Danny Ferry, Mike Budenholzer
Leave a comment

Since his racist comments about Luol Deng, Danny Ferry has mostly avoided the public eye.

He apologized through a couple statements released around the beginning of his leave of absence. He met with black community leaders. He claimed “full responsibility.”

A cadre of NBA people vouched for him. A law firm the Hawks hired to investigate themselves essentially cleared of him of being motivated by racial bias.

But there’s another side.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

Ferry’s efforts at contrition sometimes fell short to some inside the organization. Several Hawks executives were at times put off by Ferry’s behavior during a compulsory two-day sensitive training session, especially since they considered his actions triggered the assembly in the first place. He came across as inattentive and dismissive of the exercise, some said, and fiddled with his phone quite a bit. Ferry contends he was taking notes on the meeting.

“It was awkward for everyone because I had not seen or been around Hawks employees for three months,” Ferry told ESPN this summer about the sensitivity training. “I took the seminar seriously, participated in the role-play exercises and certainly learned from the two-day session.”

the Hawks satisfied Ferry on June 22 by releasing both the written Taylor report and a flowery press release in which Hawks CEO Koonin was quoted saying, among other things, that “Danny Ferry is not a racist.” Some Hawks executives grumbled that the team overreached in exonerating Ferry, but doing so — not to mention paying Ferry significantly more than the $9 million he was owed on his “golden ticket” deal — was the cost of moving on.

I don’t know whether Ferry has shown the proper level of contrition, whether he was playing on his phone or taking notes.

But I know what he said:

“He’s a good guy overall, but he’s got some African in him, and I don’t say that in a bad way other than he’s a guy that may be making side deals behind you, if that makes sense. He has a storefront out front that’s beautiful and great, but he may be selling some counterfeit stuff behind you.”

He was not reading directly from a scouting report. He did not stop when his paraphrasing repeated a racist trope.

That’s a problem.

I don’t think Ferry intended to say something racist – but he did.

It’s a fixable issue, though. Through introspection and a desire to change, he can learn from this mistake. Maybe he already has.

That some around him don’t think he took that process seriously is worth noting. They might be off base, and Ferry obviously disagrees with their perception. But this is a two-sided story despite the common narrative focusing on Ferry’s redemption.

It’ll be up to any potential future employers to sort through the discrepancies.