Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce

With Rondo out, Garnett/Pierce era in Boston must come to an end

44 Comments

I don’t like the phrase “blow it up” because that implies something rash and destructive long term. Blowing something up leaves a big hole that is hard to climb out of. That’s not how the Boston Celtics operate. They are one of the NBA’s premiere franchises in part because they get the big picture.

But it’s time to turn the page.

The Kevin Garnett/Paul Pierce era of the Celtics must come to a close.

When GM Danny Ainge re-signed Garnett last summer, when he went out and got Jason Terry and Courtney Lee, it was with the dream of making another run at a title with Pierce and Garnett as part of the team’s core. They had gone seven games with Miami in the Eastern Conference finals last year, they just wanted to take one more step. Instead this season they have looked like a team that is stumbling.

With Rajon Rondo out for this season with a torn ACL in his right knee, any dream they could find their stride is dead. The already struggling Boston offense is going to get worse long term. If they make the playoffs it will be one and done, despite their defense.

But it’s not just this season — the Rondo injury also basically kills next season, too.

Garnett (age 36) and Pierce (35) already are not young and will be a year older. Following the timeline for return we saw from Ricky Rubio and are expected to see from Derrick Rose, we can expect Rondo back around Christmas — but the guy who comes back will not be the Rondo you are used to seeing. Watch Rubio play and you can see he doesn’t move the same yet, he doesn’t trust his knee the same way, he’s not the same player. That takes time. It’s true of every player you see return from an ACL. It will take Rondo much longer to be back close to his old self.

Boston can’t wait a couple years then try to make a run with this group again.

Turn the page.

That means start looking at trades for everyone on the roster. Everyone. The thought of the Celtics talisman Paul Pierce in a Mavericks or Rockets or whatever uniform seems uncomfortably strange, but it has to be considered. Then the trigger pulled when the right offer comes in. Same for Garnett.

Understand, however, that the offers are not going to be great. Nobody gives you quality young players for old ones, not anymore in today’s stiffer luxury tax world. There is no single home-run trade here, not for the assets the Celtics have one the table. Plus, the Celtics are going to want to bring down their payroll now, not add to it (unless it’s the right player).

Boston, don’t rush into a deal, don’t make big move at the trade deadline to make a move. The offers that will come in first will be the vultures looking to pick clean the team’s carcass, Ainge needs to hang up on those calls.

But eventually, maybe this summer, more reasonable offers will come in. And Ainge has to consider them. The team as currently constructed is never going to win an NBA title or get close to it again. If banner 18 is the goal in Boston — and you know it is — you start the rebuilding process.

This is Boston — you can reload faster than most franchises. It’s a big market franchise with a great history and is a place great players want to be. You can make another deal eventually like the ones made to bring Ray Allen and Garnett in back in the summer of 2007.

But that process has to start now. Remember the past, but don’t hang on to it just for the sake of nostalgia.

Turn the page.

Jeremy Lin stars in Space Jam 3 (video)

Leave a comment

LeBron James will reportedly star in Space Jam 2.

Space Jam 3? Jeremy Lin already claimed the top role in a very, um, strange video.

Kids Jeopardy! contestant whiffs on LeBron James question (video)

LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Steve Nash, Metta World Peace
AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill
Leave a comment

Did LeBron James lead the Lakers to NBA titles in 2012 and 2013?

If you haven’t already gotten your fix of laughing at children, here’s a kid who guessed that happened:

The question, as you surely know, is who are the Miami Heat?

Doc Rivers: Clippers were third for Kevin Durant

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 22:  Kevin Durant #35 of the Oklahoma City Thunder makes a pass to Serge Ibaka #9 around DeAndre Jordan #6 and Blake Griffin #32 of the Los Angeles Clippers during a 109-97 Thunder win at Staples Center on January 22, 2013 in Los Angeles, California.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)
Harry How/Getty Images
5 Comments

The Warriors signed Kevin Durant.

The Celtics claimed they finished second for the superstar free agent.

And the bronze medal goes to…

Doc Rivers on The Vertical Podcast with Woj, as transcribed by CSN Bay Area:

And we were in it. We were in the Top 3 at the very end

We asked a simple question, and the first question I asked was, ‘Are we in the Top 3?’ And they said ‘Yes.’ So that made us feel good. My next question was, ‘Are we in the Top 2?’ And we had made the decision if they say ‘No’ then we go, if they say ‘Yes’ we stay. And they said ‘No.’

This is all obviously quite silly. It mostly matters only where Durant plays, not where he came closer to playing. Golden State won. Everyone else lost.

But teams are fighting for perception, trying to send a message to the next superstar free that they’re a legitimate destination.

I just have a hard time believing the Clippers were actually third and ahead of re-signing with the Thunder. The Clippers didn’t have enough cap space to keep Chris Paul, Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan and give Durant a max contract.

I believe Durant could’ve told the Clippers they ranked third because he liked their pitch and the statement was largely superficial. But if it actually came down to it, would Durant have taken a reduced salary or joined a team depleted by losing one of its stars? Those were the only two options for picking the Clippers.

I have my doubts, but at least Rivers has a narrative he can sell. And sell it he will.

Newspaper editor on Michael Jordan article: ‘What other photo could be more suitable than the infamous Crying Jordan meme’

SPRINGFIELD, MA - SEPTEMBER 11: Michael Jordan to the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame speaks during an induction ceremony on September 11, 2009 in Springfield, Massachusetts. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.(Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)
Jim Rogash/Getty Images
2 Comments

A Malawian newspaper, writing about Michael Jordan’s statement on race, used the Crying Jordan photo accompany the article.

How did that happen?

A page designer who didn’t understand the meme? A joke never fixed before printing? A staff-wide ignorance of the photo’s cultural relevance?

Justin Block of The Huffington Post:

As it turns out, the newspaper is called The Nation, or The Malawi Nation. When reached for comment on Thursday afternoon, The Nation Senior News Analyst Joy Ndovi stated that using the Michael Jordan Crying meme was intentional, and said Sports Editor Garry Chirwa picked the photo.

Chirwa told us that when he read the story, he felt that the emotions packed within Jordan’s quote, “I could no longer keep silent,” were represented in the Michael Jordan Crying meme.

“I just imagined him crying,” Chirwa wrote via WhatsApp.

Ndovi echoed Chirwa’s sentiments:

The article on Jordan reacting to the violence in U.S. was just the perfect one for the meme to be used. It depicts the emotional state of the former NBA star. Though it might seem unconventional, what other photo could be more suitable than the infamous Crying Jordan meme?

I can think of a few.