What’s next in sale of Kings? Do all roads point north?

19 Comments

The Maloofs have made their decision — they have reached a deal to sell the Sacramento Kings to Chris Hansen and his Seattle based group. As we reported, that sale will be formally announced in the coming days, and by Feb. 1 the Maloof family will get a $30 million deposit.

But that is not the end of the saga. So what’s next? Does Sacramento have any chance of keeping their team?

Here’s what happens from here on out.

• The new ownership group will make their application to the league for team relocation to Seattle for next season, something they must do by March 1. This is key, what nobody wants is a lame duck season where the Seattle group owns the team with plans to move but they play in an empty Sacramento arena.

The relocation committee is expected to easily approve the move, reports Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports and the NBC Sports Network. The Kings would play two seasons in Key Arena while their new stadium is built (not far from Safeco Field where the Mariners play). That stadium is going through an environmental review process now but has its financing and most governmental approvals in place already.

• The NBA’s Board of Governors — made up of the owners (or their appointed representative) — has to approve the sale, likely a vote will come when they meet in New York in April (giving the league time to do background checks on the new owners).

This is where Sacramento will makes its last stand — Mayor Kevin Johnson is scheduled to address the BOG and makes his pitch for the owners to reject the sale to Hansen and instead push the Maloofs to sell to a local ownership group. We have detailed how he is putting all of this together and it should be a good offer with legitimate big money. This group will include parties looking to build a new arena in Sacramento.

Johnson will have to show how keeping the team in Sacramento is better for the owners’ bottom line. Sacramento fans can preach image issues if they want, but money is what matters. If the lockout taught us one thing it is that. Which makes things a challenge for Sacramento because Seattle is a larger television market and the owners would get cash in their pockets from a from a relocation fee (which was $30 million for the Sonics to become the Thunder). But as we have detailed Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson believes he can make a compelling case because his group would not have to repay a loan to the city of Sacramento, nor would he have to pay relocate.

There are reports the owners just want to approve the sale and get this all behind them, but like always they will vote what is best for their pocketbooks.

• Negotiations with the Thunder over the name Sonics. Clay Bennett’s group, when it moved the team, kept the rights to the name Sonics but would be open to a transfer if a team moved to Seattle. It’s hard to see him standing in the way of this if the sale is approved, or David Stern letting him.

What is interesting is how you treat the history of the franchises. Do the old Seattle records move back to Seattle with the new franchise? What about the history and records of the Kings, a franchise with a long history going back through Kansas City to the early days of the NBA?

• Whatever happens with the sale of the team, look for a radical reorganization of the front office. Kings GM Geoff Petrie is in the last year of his deal and is reportedly going to retire at the end of the season.

Spurs head man R.C. Buford and former Pacers president Larry Bird are targets of the organization, reports Wojnarowski. Longtime NBA writer Peter Vecsey says Phil Jackson is in the mix for a front office spot. But even if the team stays it is expected that how the Kings are run as an organization will get an overhaul.

Thunder’s Enes Kanter: ‘I don’t like Golden State, so I want Cleveland to win the championship’

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez
1 Comment

When Kevin Durant left the Thunder for the Warriors, Oklahoma City center Enes Kanter jumped fully on board the pro-Russell Westbrook, anti-Durant bandwagon.

That ride doesn’t stop with his former teammate facing the Cavaliers in the NBA Finals.

Kanter, via Fox Sports Radio:

I don’t like Golden State, so I want Cleveland to win the championship.

Kanter never misses an opportunity to take a shot at the Warriors – except when Zaza Pachulia laid out Westbrook and stood over him.

Dwane Casey: Masai Ujiri assured me I’ll return as Raptors coach

(AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Galit Rodan
Leave a comment

Raptors president Masai Ujiri didn’t mince words at his season-ending press conference: Toronto’s playing style had become unacceptable.

It sounded as if he might have been planting the seed for firing Dwane Casey.

But the coach says Ujiri assured him he’d return next season.

Casey on TSN (hat tip: Blake Murphy of Raptors Republic):

I think people mistook Masai’s comments for that. We had a good meeting before that meeting, and we’ve had meeting since then – with all the coaches – as far as plans for next year and the culture reset, which I think every corporation and every team should do periodically to get the culture back in focus and that type of thing. It’s not like we’re in total chaos or anything like that. It’s just good to have roles defined, things we can do better in each of our roles.

We’re doing some good things and some things we can do much better with. And that’s what we’ll plan on doing this summer and also this fall, when we go to training camp.

The Raptors’ offensive rating has dropped from regular season to the playoffs by 8.5, 7.2 and 11.7 the last three years. Their isolation-heavy style is just easier to stop when defenses see it in consecutive games.

The big question: What does Toronto do about that?

It’d be difficult to move on from the two players most responsible for the style, DeMar DeRozan and Kyle Lowry. DeRozan is signed long-term, and if the Raptors don’t re-sign Lowry, who’ll be an unrestricted free agent this summer, they won’t have the cap space to land a comparable replacement.

The best bet is probably changing schemes from the bench and hoping the players can adjust – and maybe Casey can handle that responsibility. Hiring a new coach obviously would been the clearest path to a shake up, but maybe Casey can evolve. I’d want to see a plan from him before committing to keeping him, but maybe Ujiri got that.

Casey has played a key role in Toronto’s improvement, it’s nice to give him an opportunity to coach differently before hiring a different coach.

Kevin Durant: Don’t blame me for Nets, Magic and other teams stinking

AP Photo/Adam Hunger
1 Comment

For the first time in NBA history, the NBA Finals will feature the same matchup for three straight years.

Among those responsible: Kevin Durant, who sunk the title-contending Thunder and gave the Warriors an even stronger grip on the Western Conference.

But don’t blame him for a lack of parity league-wide.

Durant, via Sam Amick of USA Today:

“Like I’m the reason why (expletive) Orlando couldn’t make the playoffs for five, six years in a row?” he said. “Am I the reason that Brooklyn gave all their picks to Boston? Like, am I the reason that they’re not that good (laughs). I can’t play for every team, so the truth of the matter is I left one team. It’s one more team that you probably would’ve thought would’ve been a contender. One more team. I couldn’t have made the (entire) East better. I couldn’t have made everybody (else) in the West better.”

Some teams will always be better than others. The Magic, Nets and more were mis-managed before Durant left Oklahoma City.

But I’m not even sure this is the right debate.

Does the NBA even have a parity problem to blame on Durant?

Cleveland and Golden State aren’t traditional powers. Before 2015, the Warriors hadn’t won a title since 1975 and the Cavaliers had never won one. Their ascension is proof of parity – that sound management and a little luck can lift teams from the basement.

Report: Clippers take Chris Paul-to-Spurs rumor ‘very seriously’

2 Comments

Want to laugh off that Chris Paul-to-Spurs rumor?

The Clippers aren’t joining you.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

The Clippers should be concerned. Losing Paul would unravel their entire foundation, dropping them from the fringe of championship contention to out of the title picture completely. It could even help usher out Blake Griffin, who will also be an unrestricted free agent this summer. (To be fair, Paul leaving could also help convince Griffin to stay.)

About a month ago, the Clippers reportedly expected Paul to stay. They even reportedly struck a verbal agreement with him to re-sign before that. But they can’t officially sign him until July, and that leaves the door open for him to leave.

The Clippers should be heartened by their advantages – a prime market and a projected max offer of $205 million over five years.

The most another team projects to be able to offer is $152 million over four years, and San Antonio will have a hard time doing that. Even if they trim their roster to Kawhi Leonard, LaMarcus Aldridge, Pau Gasol, Danny Green and Tony Parker, the Spurs would still have to shed two of those players to clear max cap space.

So, never say never, but the Clippers’ concern might be rooted more in the dire consequences of Paul leaving rather than the likelihood of it.