Blake Griffin, Jared Sullinger

Want to know if the Clippers are for real? Ask the Celtics (who lost to them by 29)


I’ve done some sports talk radio spots the last few days around the nation and this still seems to be the question on a lot of sports fans lips:

Are the Clippers really that good? Like title contender good?

Why don’t you go ask Doc Rivers or the Celtics? Or Rajon Rondo? Or Paul Pierce? Maybe not Kevin Garnett, that probably doesn’t go as well.

Boston became the latest victim of the Clippers combination of pressure defense and fast break finishing — Los Angeles handed Boston its worst loss of the season, 106-77. It was a thrashing. That is 15 straight wins for the Clippers (against 14 different teams, nearly half the NBA).

This game was over early — Boston opened the game shooting 3-of-11 and those misses became fast break opportunities for the Clippers and suddenly it was 18-4 before TNT even bothered to start showing the game (blame Darren Collison).

For the Clippers, everything was working — Blake Griffin was hitting midrange shots on his way to 15 points. Chris Paul was doing his best Curly Neal impression dribbling through the Celtics defense. Willie Green was draining threes.

And that was before the Clippers even got to their real strength — their bench. Matt Barnes had 21 points and Jamal Crawford 17. Even Lamar Odom was making plays without scoring, racking up 13 rebounds, five assists and four blocked shots.

We all get dazzled by the Clippers highlights but they are running off their defense — Boston shot 40 percent on the night, had 18 turnovers and 7 shots blocked. Each one of those misses or turnovers becomes the Clippers in transition, where their bigs run the floor faster than yours, their guards — CP3 and Eric Bledsoe — make the right decisions with the ball and they have shooters who can fill lanes or run to the corner for a three.

Boston, meanwhile, looked like they didn’t even know what hit them and never seriously threatened in the game. They got the lead down to four in the second quarter, so the Clippers responded with an 8-0 run and you knew what kind of night it would be. Kevin Garnett had 16 points on 11 shots, but every other Celtic struggled (Rajon Rondo was 4-of-121, Paul Pierce 5-of-13, and so on down the line).

A couple of days after the Celtics looked like they had a win they could build on in Brooklyn, they got steamrolled by the hottest team in the NBA. The only Celtic able to slow the Clippers was Jared Sullinger, and he did it by getting a flagrant foul for hitting Griffin around the neck.

Boston, now 14-14, need to just put this behind them and move on.

So maybe don’t ask them if the Clippers are for real. The evidence is in the final score.

Brandon Armstrong impersonates Ray Allen (video)

2014 NBA Finals - Game Five
Leave a comment

Ray Allen is retired-ish, but he’ll always be running through screens – in our mind and in this video.

Celtics draft pick Marcus Thornton gets beer dumped on head during Australian game (video)

Marcus Thornton, Will Cherry
Leave a comment

The Celtics drafted Marcus Thornton with No. 45 pick in the 2015 NBA draft. That essentially entitled him to the required tender – a one-year contract offer, surely unguaranteed at the minimum.

Thornton rejected that, which is almost always a mistake.

Rejecting the tender is a favor to the drafting team, which gets to keep the player’s exclusive rights for a year. If Thornton tries to join the NBA now, he’s stuck negotiating with only the Celtics.

By accepting the tender, the player typically gets one of two outcomes. He either plays on that contract and draws an NBA salary or he gets waived. But even getting waived is better than rejecting the tender, because at least the player becomes a free agent and can negotiate with any team.

Players who reject the tender go to another league and play for less money. In Thornton’s case, that mean Australia.

How’s that going?

(Almost) never reject the required tender as a second-round pick.

Byron Scott says they just have to get Kobe Bryant better looks

Kobe Bryant, Joe Johnson, Byron Scott

Kobe Bryant is averaging 15.2 points a game at age 37. It’s just taking him 16.4 shots per game to get there. After his 1-of-14 shooting performance against the Warriors the other night — with too much isolation and too many plays run just for him — there has been a lot of talk about his shot. With reason, this is his shot chart so far this season.

Kobe shotchart season

So what do the Lakers’ do? Get Kobe to shoot less and get the ball in the hands of the young stars they supposed to be developing more? Nah.

They just need to get Kobe better looks, Scott told the Los Angeles Times.

“I know his mentality is that he can still play in this league,” Scott said. “And we feel the same way….

“Obviously he’s struggling right now with his shot, and I think everybody can see that,” Scott said. “So it’s trying to get him in better position to be able to have an opportunity to knock those shots down on a consistent basis. That’s No. 1.

“I don’t know if it’s his legs. I don’t think so. Again, our conversations are pretty blunt. … He tells me when he is tired and he tells me when he’s not tired. And the last few days, he said he feels great. So, I don’t think it’s a matter of him being tired or his legs being tired. I think it’s a matter of his timing being a little off.”

Yes, how could it be his legs? It’s not like he’s a 37-year-old with more than 55,000 NBA minutes played, and coming off an Achilles rupture and major knee surgery.

Honestly, I hope the Lakers and Kobe find a balance soon, because they have become just hard to watch. And I don’t want Kobe to go out this way.

Is Stephen Curry the Lionel Messi of the NBA?

Lionel Messi

Stephen Curry has reached the transcendent point in his career. We’re now talking about if he has passed LeBron James as the best player on the planet (he has), and we’re starting to think about his legacy as the perfect point guard for a modern NBA small-ball, space-and-pace offense. Plus he’s just a joy to watch play.

Does that make him the Lionel Messi of the NBA?

Curry was asked to compare himself to the Barcelona/Argentinian player who (arguably) is the greatest soccer player in the world, certainly as elite a finisher as that sport has ever seen. Here is his answer, via the Sydney Morning Herald of Australia. Is Curry the bigger international star now?

“I don’t know – it’s a chicken and egg kind of conversation,” Curry said while laughing.

“We both have a creative style, a feel when you are out on the pitch or the court. I’m trying to do some fancy things out there with both hands, making crossover moves and having a certain flair to my game and that’s definitely the style Messi has when he is out there in his matches.”

I love Curry, but Messi is the bigger international star.

But I love the comparison in terms of the must-watch nature of the two stars, the flair in their games, the sense that you have to keep an eye on them at all times because the spectacular could happen any time they touch the ball. When the ball comes to them, everybody leads forward in their chairs. That is the sign of a real superstar.