Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, Mirza Teletovic, Jerry Stackhouse

Baseline to Baseline recaps: Bucks tried to give up 29 point lead, hang on to beat Nets


Welcome to PBT’s roundup of the day in NBA action. Or, what you missed while watching some goat farmers win the Amazing Race

Jazz 117, Lakers 110: The Lakers most passionate and probably best player was Jordan Hill. That’s not a good sign. The Lakers defense was sad and Utah outworked them, we break it all down here.

Knicks, 112, Nuggets 106: Carmelo Anthony was back and the Knicks looked good in a win over the inconsistent Nuggets. Our own Brett Pollakoff broke it down for us.

Bucks 97, Nets 88: After an early 9-0 run by Brooklyn this game was all Milwaukee — the Bucks were up 7 after one quarter, 17 at the half and got the lead up to 29 in the third and that was just too deep for the Nets to get out of. Even though the Nets got it all the way back down to six in the fourth quarter. The Bucks got that lead because of their guards: Brandon Jennings had 18 of his 26 in the first half and Monta Ellis added 24 points on 13 shots. Gerald Wallace was key to the Nets comeback and had 9 of his 16 in the fourth quarter. Deron Williams had 18 on the night.

Clippers 102, Raptors 83: This game was tied 60-60 and was close until a 21-1 Los Angeles fourth quarter run — a run from their bench. Eric Bledsoe had 10 in the fourth quarter, Jamal Crawford and Ronny Turiaf added 6 each and no Clipper starter played in the fourth quarter. For the third straight game. That kind of bench is huge during a long regular season.

Thunder 104, Pacers 93: It was a tale of two halves. In the first half the Thunder didn’t put much pressure on the Pacers defensively and the result was David West with 13 points and Lance Stephenson with 10, combined they were 10-of-13 shooting. But in the second half the Thunder stepped up the pressure, Indiana shot 33.3 percent for the half and was 0-7 in the final 5:30, and that was all she wrote. Kevin Durant had 27, Kevin Martin had an efficient 24 for OKC

Magic 98, Suns 90: The gutted Magic have gone 3-2 on their road trip Phoenix has now lost seven straight. This game was decided at the end of the third quarter and into the start of the fourth when the Magic went on a 21-10 run to take the lead they would not let go. It was the Magic bench, which had 49 points, that was key — especially Andrew Nicholson, who had 19 points on 9-of-11 shooting, plus had 9 boards. J.J. Redick had 20 for the Magic; Shannon Brown led the Suns with 17 points but needed 16 shots to get them.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?