Boston Celtics v Brooklyn Nets

Inconsistent Celtics miss Rondo, also miss win in Brooklyn


When it was all over none other than political stats guru Nate Silver tweeted that this was the “Biggest win in the history of the Brooklyn Nets.” Of course, statistically it had a 20% chance of that (this is only win five in Brooklyn) and as the others were against Toronto, Cleveland and Orlando twice there wasn’t a lot of competition.

Still, this is a quality win for Brooklyn — this was tied 87-87 with three minutes to and down the stretch it was the Nets that knocked down the shots, made their free throws and came away with a 102-97 win.

What was most evident in this game however is that Boston really needs Rajon Rondo for their offense to be smooth. Out with a sprained ankle suffered Wednesday night — and with no timetable for his return — this was a reminder of how central Rondo is to getting everything flowing for Boston. Especially in the final minutes, when Boston struggled to get good looks without Rondo creating them.

They had their moments — a 20-2 run in the third quarter that gave Boston a lead for one. Paul Pierce was putting up points both working off the ball and creating some shots, he finished with 22 on the night.

But there was no flow without Rondo. It was fits and starts.

Of course, that doesn’t really explain how Brooklyn abused Boston on the boards — the Nets had 15 offensive rebounds in the first half, and with the game in doubt late Brook Lopez came up with an offensive board and putback that kept the Celtics at arms length.

With the game tied 87-87 and three minutes left Avery Johnson pulled out the old Mike Wooodson playbook and seemed to run a lot of iso-Joe for Joe Johnson — but it worked. He created his own shot for a 10-footer, he hit a contested 17 footer over Paul Pierce, and when he missed the 18-foot fadeaway Lopez was there to clean it up.

Boston’s chances faded when down three inside a minute Pierce got Reggie Evans switched on him off a pick, backed up, blew by him and got fouled trying to score. He just missed making it an and-one as it rolled off the rim. Then Pierce missed both free throws.

And that was it, even though Avery Johnson started the end of game fouling routine oddly early and up four. It worked, it was just odd.

Williams and Lopez each finished with 24 for the Nets, Joe Johnson 19, Kris Humphries had 10 points and 13 boards. Leandro Barbosa had 17 points on just 11 shots starting for Rondo, but he had just two assists.

With the win the Nets are 5-2 and on a four-game winning streak, while the Celtics drop to 5-4 in a season where they are clearly still trying to find a rhythm.

And if this game was any indication, they are not going to find it until Rondo gets back.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?