Kobe Bryant

Lakers hit the easy button, cruise to a 101-77 victory over Golden State

21 Comments

In the middle of the third quarter, with the Lakers enjoying a double-digit lead, Kobe Bryant went to the free throw line. Typically, this is when Bryant is serenaded with the familiar “MVP! MVP!” chants from the Staples Center crowd. But that didn’t happen.

It wasn’t because Kobe was having a bad night – quite the opposite. He was toeing the line between distributor and scorer wonderfully (27 points, 7 assists), and the Lakers offense, despite some serious bricklaying from Metta World Peace, actually looked pretty smooth en route to a 101-77 blowout win over Golden State.

So why wasn’t Kobe getting his MVP chants? The Lakers faithful surely couldn’t have come to a collective decision that those chants, in Game 6 of an 82-game season, sound ridiculous. So what was this? Who is…Bill? Oh, right.

“We want Phil! We want Phil! We want Phil!”

The chants grew louder and louder – even free tacos wouldn’t evoke so much emotion.

The fact that the Lakers were finally defending better, chasing the Warriors’ shooters off the 3-point line and sending them into the teeth of the defense, was secondary. It didn’t seem to matter that the Lakers, finally, weren’t toasted in transition or on the offensive glass.

Mike Brown’s firing serves to a greater point. Slow progression is not something the Lakers or their fanbase know. If they aren’t playing like a championship team, regardless of the circumstances, there has to be changes. With Kobe Bryant’s clock ticking, there is no time for patience. With Dwight Howard’s contract expiring, there is no time for patience.

Right or wrong, Mike Brown is gone. The Lakers got the nice “dead coach bounce” – the blowout win after canning your coach. Happens all the time, but this was an impressive victory nonetheless. The Lakers played inside-out, and felt less “forced” offensively. It was more simple. The offense could best be described as “our players are better than yours, watch this” instead of the forced handoffs and general awkwardness of the five previous games. There were lots of positive takeaways defensively as well, particularly holding one of the league’s best shooting backcourts (Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson) to a 12-for-32 effort.

But the defensive numbers, as great as they are, didn’t resonate quite like the chants did. The people want Phil Jackson – the players want Phil Jackson – and until he’s back giving reading assignments and administering zen lessons, this will be a distraction. This won’t go away. Not even when the Lakers are in the middle of cruising to a much-needed victory.

Interim head coach Bernie Bickerstaff didn’t inherit Mike Brown’s team – he inherited Phil Jackson’s shadow, just like Mike Brown did. Good luck with that.

NBA: Kenneth Faried got away with foul on decisive basket in Nuggets’ win over Bulls

1 Comment

The Bulls’ biggest loss Friday was Jimmy Butler to injury. His absence certainly contributed to a loss to the Timberwolves the following night.

But Chicago also lost to the Nuggets on Friday, and perhaps that wouldn’t have happened if the game were called correctly down the stretch.

With Denver up two points and 21.1 seconds remaining, Kenneth Faried offensively rebounded a free throw and scored. The Bulls then intentionally fouled down the stretch, and Faried and Danilo Gallinari added a few free throws in the Nuggets’ 115-110 win.

One problem: Faried should’ve been called for offensively fouling Taj Gibson on the key putback, according to the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report:

Faried (DEN) extends his arm into Gibson (CHI) and dislodges him, affecting his ability to retrieve the rebound.

This was a huge swing. Instead of Taj Gibson – a 69% career free-throw shooter – going to the line for two attempts with Chicago down two points, Faried put the Nuggets up four. Even if Gibson split at the line, the Bulls would have been in significantly better shape.

As usual, we can’t know what would’ve happened if this call were made correctly. But it significantly set back Chicago.

NBA considering if jump-on-back foul should be flagrant foul

Leave a comment

The video above is an intentional foul — Chris Paul jumped on the back of Dwight Howard. The same thing has happened to Andre Drummond.

Is it a flagrant foul?

The Boston Celtics tweeted this out on Sunday.

The NBA was quick to let people know that this is just something under consideration — there has been no change in the rules. This may well be where the league is headed, but it’s not there yet.

The NBA defines a flagrant foul as “unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent.” To me, leaping on a player’s back like that qualifies. (A flagrant two foul is “unnecessary and excessive contact” and leads to an ejection; this is not that.)

Jared Dudley — one of the more vocal players on union issues — added a good point.

Consider this part of the coming changes on the intentional fouling rules period. But this one tweak could come much faster.

NBA: Foul on Cavaliers that sparked Celtics’ comeback called in error

Cleveland Cavaliers' J.R. Smith makes a move on Boston Celtics' Evan Turner (11) during the third quarter of a NBA basketball game in Boston Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)
4 Comments

The Cavaliers were in great shape against the Celtics on Friday, leading by four points with seven seconds left.

Then, it all went so wrong for Cleveland.

J.R. Smith was called for fouling Evan Turner on a made layup, cutting the margin to two points. Turner missed the free throw, but the ball went out of bounds off the Cavs. Then, Avery Bradley made a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to give Boston the win.

Rewind, though, and an incorrect call drove the sequence, according to the NBA.

Smith shouldn’t have been called for fouling Turner, per the Last Two Minute Report:

Smith (CLE) makes incidental contact with Turner’s (BOS) body as he attempts the layup.

If this were officiated correctly, the Cavs would’ve had the ball and a two-point lead with 5.9 seconds left. That’s not a lock to win – they’d still have to inbound the ball and make their free throws – but it’s close.

Cleveland is definitely entitled to feel the refs wronged them out of a victory.

Report: Kevin Durant has “done his due diligence on the Bay Area”

4 Comments

Kevin Durant has not made up his mind about what he will do as a free agent this summer. Until his playoff run ends, whenever that may be for the Thunder, his focus will be on bringing a title to Oklahoma City.

But even he admits he can’t help but think about free agency a little.

The buzz around the league is Golden State is at the front of the line if Durant decides to leave OKC, and he has done some research, reports Marc Spears of Yahoo Sports.

The Warriors play in front of an intimidating Oracle Arena crowd and are expected to debut a new San Francisco arena in 2019. Durant has quietly done his due diligence on the Bay Area, too, sources told Yahoo Sports.

His people — specifically agent Rich Kleiman and personal manager Charlie Bell — would be stupid not to have done some research on not only Golden State but on every other team he might consider: Houston, Miami, Washington, both teams in Los Angeles, the Knicks, and on down the line. Golden State, playing with Stephen Curry, certainly would have its attractions.

I’m still in the camp that Durant signs a 1+1 deal to stay in Oklahoma City (meaning he can opt out after one more season, in 2017), and it’s all about the cash. While he could get 30 percent of a $90 million cap this summer (about $27 million a season to start), with one more year of service in 2017 Durant could get 35 percent of $108 million ($37.8 million to start). That’s a lot of cash. Plus he gets one more chance at a ring with Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka, who both are 2017 free agents.

But you can be sure whatever Durant decides, it will be well researched and thought out. And he’s not going to announce it in a live special on ESPN.