Marc Gasol Zach Randolph

Three Stars of the Night: When Duty Calls


Points are put on a pedestal in the NBA, so what happens when a team loses its big scorer to injury or simply doesn’t have one on the roster? Other guys step up. We tend to forget, but just about every NBA player (earmuffs, Reggie Evans) can score when given enough chances. It might not always going to be pretty, or efficient, but most of these guys have scored 30 points a game on some level. For tonight’s Three Stars, we showcase three guys who answered the scoring bell and led their teams to victory.

Third Star: Andrei Kirilenko (18 points, 10 rebounds, 6 assists, 4 blocks)

Continually underrated, Kirilenko has been putting up stat lines like this for ages to little fanfare outside of the fantasy basketball crowd. Even when he was tearing it up overseas as a number one option, the NBA crowd still remained skeptical. With Kevin Love and Ricky Rubio out, the Wolves have started the season scoring by committee, but tonight it was AK47 who took over the game in the second half and put the Wolves on his wings to overcome a 15-point deficit at the break.

Second Star: O.J. Mayo (32 points on 12-for-18 shooting)

Make that back-to-back games with over 30 points for Mayo, who has taken the Mavericks’ primary scorer role and ran with it early in the season. Mayo has looked like a perfect match next to point guard Darren Collison, a burner who flies up the court and looks for kickout opportunities to spot up shooters. Fortunately for Mayo, he’s the only one young enough and athletic enough to keep up with Collison, so the ball just keeps finding his way. Let’s see a bigger sample size before we announce that Mayo has finally reached his potential, but it’s a good start nonetheless.

First Star: Marc Gasol (22 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists, 3 blocks)

It’s stunning how good Gasol is when he’s aggressive and Memphis makes it a priority to run the offense through him. Because the Grizzlies offense has about the same spacing as five guys in an elevator would, Gasol often finds himself away from the basket to at least try and allow some driving lanes. Gasol lived a little closer to the basket tonight, and really just overwhelmed Al Jefferson and company with his size. Gasol, an incredibly underrated defender, also took care of Jefferson on the other end, staying on his feet and refusing to fall in the web of pump fakes Jefferson typically spins. And how about those 8 assists? Is there a better passing big man than Marc Gasol? Maybe his brother Pau, but that’s about it.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?