NBA Draft: PBT’s pick-by-pick Draft tracker

51 Comments

Locate the refresh button on your browser now, because this is where you are going to want to be for the entire 2012 NBA Draft.

Every pick will be discussed here, from Anthony Davis at No. 1 to the next Isaiah Thomas at No. 60 (last year’s final pick who turned out to end the season as a starter for the Kings). All the trades, all the great moves, all the questionable picks will be broken down right here all night long. Just stay with us and hit refresh.

Let’s get it started:

1. New Orleans Hornets: Anthony Davis (6’10” power forward, Kentucky). The Hornets get a franchise foundation big man. A guy scouts say could have a Kevin Garnett/Tim Duncan like career if he lives up to his potential. Davis is a long-armed (7’4” wingspan) athletic big who will be a shot blocking force in the paint from day one. His offense, especially in the post, needs work but he has the tools and was a very efficient scorer in college. The Hornets now have the foundation (with Eric Gordon) to be very good in a few years.

2. Charlotte Bobcats: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist (6’7” small forward, Kentucky). Charlotte doesn’t trade the pick (reports vary on how close they got). They get a heck of a player. Coaches love him because the guy plays hard on both ends every single play. He is very athletic and uses that well on defense. On offense he is great in transition and could get to the rim in college but needs a steady jump shot now.

3. Washington Wizards: Bradley Beal (6’5” shooting guard, Florida). While his college numbers don’t show it (33.9 percent from three last season) scouts will tell you he is one of the best shooters in this draft, with incredible range. He’s athletic and can put the ball on the floor. He can defend. Scouts thought he looked like a young Ray Allen, if he comes close that’s a heck of a get for Washington. He should pair well with John Wall.

4. Cleveland Cavaliers: Dion Waiters (6’4” shooting guard, Syracuse). Wow, what a gamble by the Cavaliers. A couple of weeks before the draft Waiters wasn’t even in the lottery, however the Orangeman’s sixth man moved up the draft boards fast. Because he can score and teams see a potential spark plug in him. Waiters provides scoring often off penetration (he is fantastic at navigating the pick-and-roll), and he is very strong on his drives to the rim. His aggressiveness carries over to the defensive end. He’s a bit undersized and his jumpers needs to be more consistent. But fans are going to love him because he is aggressive. We’ll see, the Cavs passed up some quality players to get him.

5. Sacramento Kings: Thomas Robinson (6’9” power forward, Kansas). Any chance this pick would get traded went away when Robinson fell to the Kings, they like him a lot. They should. Other teams above them may regret passing on him in a few years. He is very athletic (he had the same combine vertical as Blake Griffin) power forward with a real nose for the ball. He will be a force as a rebounder from the start and can score around the rim. Needs to work on his perimeter game. College coach Bill Self thought he was like Paul Millsap, I think he can be a better version of Millsap.

6. Portland Trail Blazers: Damian Lillard (6’3” point guard, Weber State). Don’t let the small school fool you, Lillard is the best point guard in this draft. He is more of a scoring guard in college who needs to learn to be a floor general and point in the NBA, but he has a good basketball IQ and got teammates involved (he can pass). He can shoot from distance or put the ball on the floor and get into the paint. Great pick by Portland, the pick-and-roll with him and LaMarcus Aldridge is going to be interesting.

7. Golden State Warriors: Harrison Barnes (6’8” small forward, North Carolina). He fell farther than some expected and could end up being a steal if he lives up to potential. Don’t be fooled by what you saw in the NCAA Tournament (when he shot 33 percent), this guy can score at the NBA level. He has a polished offensive game and can knock down the midrange jumper. Plus, he can defend. Moved up draft boards after showing 38-inch flat-footed vertical at combine.

8. Toronto Raptors: Terrence Ross (6’7” shooting guard/small forward, Washington). This is higher than most expected for one of of the real sleepers in this draft (because nobody was watching the dreadful Pac-12 last year). He’s an excellent athlete who loves the jump shot (40 percent of his shots last season were threes) but if you close out he can blow by you. He can finish at the rim. He needs to develop — his handle isn’t NBA level, he needs a midrange game, he needs to figure out when to score and when to defer — but he could put it together and be at least solid and maybe special in a few years. He plays the same position as DeMar DeRozan, who has one year left on his deal in Toronto. Interesting.

9. Detroit Pistons: Andre Drummond (7’0” center, Connecticut). One of the biggest risk/reward picks in the draft. He has unbelievable physical tools and, while he needs to develop, he could be an Andrew Bynum/Serge Ibaka like center in five years. But with all that he averaged 10 points and 7.6 rebounds per game in college, there are serious questions about his desire and commitment to himself and the game. He could be a big bust. Workouts drew really mixed reviews. Him next to Greg Monroe makes a long front line that could be very good in Detroit.

10. New Orleans Hornets: Austin Rivers (6’5” combo guard, Duke). The son of Celtics coach Doc Rivers has moved up draft boards in recent weeks because he has a smooth offensive game. He can shoot with range, he can get to the basket, he can score. The concern is how he fits in — he has a scorer’s mentality (he patterned his game after Kobe Bryant) but he’s not an elite athlete and there will be better scorers on his team. He’s got the hoops IQ (he plays like a coach’s son) but will he play team ball? The Hornets now have Rivers, Anthony Davis and will re-sign Eric Gordon — that is a real foundation to build something special on.

11. Portland Trail Blazers: Meyers Leonard (7’1” center, Illinois). He has the physical tools to be a classic NBA center — he is tall, long and athletic for his size. He can run the floor. His offense needs a lot of polish, and he needs to get stronger, but you can see him getting post touches or setting a high screen and rolling to the basket hard. He helped himself out a lot at the NBA Draft combine in interviews. He is the traditional big to go next to LaMarcus Aldridge, plus he can set some picks for Damian Lillard. A center to Portland… just stay healthy.

12. Houston Rockets: Jeremy Lamb (6’5” shooting guard, Connetticut). There are a number of good two guards in this draft but Lamb has the highest ceiling of all of them. Fantastic athlete, 7-foot wingspan (which helps his defense) and just a pure scorer — he shot 60 percent from 2 last season in college. The knock is his passion and drive — he seems to just coast at times. Good pick here for the Rockets, but what does this say about Kevin Martin’s future in Houston?

13. Phoenix Suns: Kendall Marshall (6’4” point guard, North Carolina). Whether or not Steve Nash comes back to Phoenix he could be the point guard of the future. A classic old-school pure point guard who is the best passer in this draft (and maybe the last few drafts) and has a great basketball IQ, he can be a floor general in the NBA. He’s not an exceptional athlete and he needs to develop a steady shot to be a threat. Solid pick.

14. Milwaukee Bucks: John Henson (6’10 power forward, North Carolina). They needed more size after trading Andrew Bogut, and they have it. A long, very athletic guy who can give you rebounding and defense right from the start. Fans will love him because he can block shots into the third row. But his offense is still raw (but has shown improvement at UNC). If he can develop steady offense he could be a steal here in a few years.

15. Philadelphia 76ers: Maurice Harkless (6’9” small forward, St. John’s). This guy looks like an NBA player — long, athletic, can leap out of the building, knows how to finish in transition. But he is raw, especially offensively on the perimeter (where he will have to play in the NBA). He works well off the ball, he doesn’t really have the handles to create his own shot and his jumper is hot and cold. He’s going to make plays the fans like, but will frustrate his coach with inconsistent defense and effort. A lot of tools, we’ll see how he develops them.

16. Houston Rockets: Royce White (6’8” power forward, Iowa State). If he can get his head right this may be a steal for Houston and is a good risk. He has an NBA power forward’s body and it comes with excellent handles and passing. In college he played a point-forward where he led the team in points, assists and rebounds. He can score inside or out. There are a lot things to like. On the flip side, his shot is very inconsistent. And there are some red flags — he’s had legal issues and also he has an anxiety disorder with a fear of flying. Again, if he is mentally right this is a good pick.

17. Dallas Mavericks: Tyler Zeller (7’0” center, North Carolina) He has been traded to the Cleveland Cavaliers for the No. 24, 33 and 34 picks. As for Zeller… solid. The word everyone uses about Zeller is solid, he does a lot of things pretty well. He is polished, he can score around the basket, has a jumper, he runs the floor well, he plays smart, he will rebound and defend. Not an exceptional athlete, not likely to be an All-Star, but he will give you quality minutes starting this year.

18. Houston Rockets: Terrence Jones (6’9” can play either forward spot, Kentucky). A very athletic and versatile player — he can score in the post, knock down threes (although you can bet the team will rework his shot mechanics) and blow by his man off the dribble. He’s a good defender. There are real questions about his effort — he disappeard for stretches and in 12 games scored in single digits. Houston took some talented guys with questions but these are smart mid-round gambles. It’s a good pick.

19. Orlando Magic: Andrew Nicholson (6’9” power forward/center, St. Bonaventure). Don’t try to read any Dwight Howard tea leafs here, that is a different issue. You don’t get a Howard replacement at 19. As for Nicholson, he carried a heavy offensive load in college and was still very effiecent — he shot nearly 60 percent on twos and 40 percent from three. He can score back to the basket or face up. He attacks the rim. He’s got a 7’4” wingspan. He’s been moving up draft boards as teams see a David West-lite kind of guy. He’s not going to carry a team, but can be a good role player. Especially on a veteran team.

20. Denver Nuggets: Evan Fournier (6’7” shooting guard/small forward, France). He impressed PBT’s Brett Pollakoff who saw him in person at the adidas EuroCamp in Italy: “Fournier is listed as a forward on the camp’s roster, but spends plenty of time handling the ball, and is comfortable at the two as well, where he has no trouble showcasing a smooth shooting stroke, even from deep three-point distance. His value as both a playmaker and a legitimate wing who can competently play three positions is undoubtedly going to be of interest to plenty of NBA teams.” There are questions about his defense and he needs to gain strength, but he could be a peak John Salmons like scorer from the wing someday.

21. Boston Celtics: Jared Sullinger (6’9” power forward, Ohio State). I like this pick for Boston. Sullinger would have been a top 5 pick last year but went back to school. He is an undersized power forward who plays below the rim (read: not that athletic) but knows how to score with a soft touch, and makes smart plays without turning the ball over (think a Luis Scola type). He fell down draft boards after a medical red flag about his back, something his camp was due to tight hamstrings and he can stretch them out. Bottom line, his smart style of play should fit in well with the Celtics veterans.

22. Boston Celtics: Fab Melo (7’0” center, Syracuse). This is a nice young combo with Sullinger. Melo, a big man out of Brazil, can provide some defense and shot blocking from the start. But he’s a project. He has the size of an NBA center and he moves well for someone his size. But don’t expect much offense out of him at all, he is very raw (although there were reports he’s worked on a midrange jumper and it looks pretty good). Likely not a future All-Star but could be a solid NBA big if he develops.

23. Atlanta Hawks: John Jenkins (6’4” shooting guard, Vanderbilt). Scouts say Jenkins is the best pure shooter in this draft, with a lightning quick release. He shot 44 percent from three last year. The problem is he’s not really great at anything else — he’s not an elite athlete, he’s a bit small for the two in the NBA, we could go on but you get the idea. Still, he can shoot the rock from great distance.

24. Dallas Mavericks: Jared Cunningham (6’5” shooting guard, Oregon State). This officially was a pick made by the Cavaliers but he really belongs to Dallas as part of the Tyler Zeller trade. There are a lot of scouts pretty high on this guy as a sleeper. He is long, a good athlete who likes to play in transition, a good defender and on offense has can take a guy in isolation and get to the rim. He’s a bit of a project — he needs to get stronger and his jump shot has to become reliable — but there is real potential here.

25. Memphis Grizzlies: Tony Wroten (6’6” combo guard, Washington). He certainly has an NBA body — he’s got good size for a guard and is very athletic. He can drive the lane and finish through contact (but only with his left hand, he needs to get a right fast). He’s a good passer. But he can play undisciplined and reckless, he takes bad shots and his jump shot is not at all reliable right now. He’s a project. But he has the tools to be a quality guard in this league if he can learn to make better decisions and get a steady jumper.

26. Indiana Pacers: Miles Plumlee (7’0” center, Duke). This pick fills a need the Pacers lost last season. Plumlee rose up the board after working out for teams. He certainly has NBA size and strength, and he moves well. He can even run the floor. But he is very raw on offense (he shot 61 percent but he didn’t shoot much at all, averaging 6.6 points per game). He could develop into a solid big man, think Jeff Foster. The Pacers could use another Jeff Foster.

27. Miami Heat: Arnett Moultrie (6’11 power forward Mississippi State). Moultrie is not staying with the Heat, Yahoo Sports reports he will be traded to the 76ers. He has the tools you want in an NBA big man — he’s long, great leaper, runs the floor well, is great on the boards and can finish at the rim if you set him up. He has a midrange jumper as well, but can spend too much time looking for it and not getting to the rim. He has to get stronger and he has to be committed to defense to really step forward. Don’t expect a game-changing big, he can be solid starter if he develops.

28. Oklahoma City Thunder: Perry Jones III (6’11” power forward, Baylor). This is a great landing spot for him, a professional locker room and team that will not tollerate him not being mentally focused. Jones is the kind of guy that drives teams and fans crazy, but this far down the draft he’s worth the risk. On raw athleticism and potential he could be the second best player in this draft — he can play inside or out, runs the floor in transition, leaps out of the building and can board. But he rarely shows that on the court, he disappears through large stretches of the game. Some teams like him more as a tall three than a five in the paint. Also reports of a knee issue helped him slide down the board.

29. Chicago Bulls: Marquis Teague (6’2” point guard, Kentucky). Yes, he is the younger brother of Atlanta’s Jeff Teague. A lot was asked of Marquis at Kentucky and he scored points efficiently for them in the NCAA Tournament. He is very quick and wants to push the tempo and run — but that led to out of control play and turnover issues. He needs a jumper (shot 32.5 percent from three last year). He will make a nice backup for Derrick Rose the next few years, we’ll see what this means for C.J. Watson.

30: Golden State Warriors: Festus Ezeli (6’11” center, Vanderbuilt). He has the physical tools you want in an NBA big — he’s athletic, strong, moves well — but his game is very raw. He’s a project. He can block shots and may be a role player down the line. The Nigeria native needs a better understanding of the game, post moves and how to defend post moves.

SECOND ROUND

31. Charlotte Bobcats: Jeff Taylor (6’7” small forward, Vanderbilt). Some guys take time to develop. Taylor’s elite athleticism had him on NBA radars early but he didn’t really put his game together until his senior season (16.1 points per game, shot 42 percent from three). He can defend and shoot from distance, but he’s not a wing who can create his own shot.

32. Washington Wizards: Tomas Satoransky (6’8” shooting guard Czech Republic). He’s tall but he’s really a combo guard. Here is how PBT’s own Brett Pollakoff described him after seeing him at adidas Eurocamp: “Satoransky ran the point and played off the ball equally well, and whipped the ball around the perimeter with confidence, always looking to create the best shot for his teammates. When it was his turn to score, he showcased a smooth stroke from the outside, and was able to put the ball on the floor and finish in traffic, as well.” He needs some seasoning and a steadier shot, but he has potential.

33. Cleveland Cavaliers: Bernard James (6’10” center, Florida State). James is headed to the Dallas Mavericks as part of a trade for Zeller. James is 27 years old and is an Iraq/Afganistan war veteran (he didn’t play in high school then had a growth spurt while in the Air Force). He is a high-energy defensive specialist who has NBA size and athleticism. He will not score a ton in the NBA but he was efficient at it in college. He’d have gone higher if not for the age issue. He reportedly did very well in the NBA Draft Combine interviews and won over some front office folk. His ceiling is the next Joel Anthony.

34. Cleveland Cavaliers: Jae Crowder (6’6” small forward, Marquette). Headed to Dallas as part of a trade. A little undersized but a hard working guy at both ends of the floor who will give you a full effort and play smart. He’s got some perimeter game, the problem really is his strength is a power forward game and he’s the size of an NBA shooting guard.

35. Golden State Warriors: Draymond Green (6’7” power forward, Michigan State). Great pick at this spot. He’s got a versatile game — he can score inside but also has a nice jumper, is a good passer, and he can rebound. Plays a smart game. He is undersized as a power forward and doesn’t have a game that makes him a three. He can make a nice role player and can step into that almost immediately.

36. Sacramento Kings: Orlando Johnson (6’3” shooting guard, UC Santa Barbara). He has been traded to the Indiana Pacers (for cash). I’ve seen him in person the past few years, he has a real NBA body and NBA three point range on his shot. He is not a great athlete for the NBA level. He was asked to do a lot for the Gauchos and hit a lot of contested, difficult shots (the kind he will need to hit in the NBA). Not great at creating his own shot.

37. Toronto Raptors: Quincy Acy (6’6″ small forward, Baylor): Not the most skilled guy ever but he wants it and works hard on every play. Think Ronny Turiaf, but smaller. Acy is a great athlete, we’ll see if he can turn that and his motor into an NBA career.

38. Denver Nuggets: Quincy Miller (6’10” small forward, Baylor). A top player out of high school, he blew out his ACL in his senior year and never looked fully recovered at Baylor, where he was very inconsistent. As teams took a closer look, and got medical reports on his knee, he fell down the draft board. But he has the raw tools of a lottery pick, plays a smart and very versatile game. If he gets healthy, puts on some muscle and steadies his shot he could be very good.

39. Detroit Pistons: Khris Middleton (6’8” small forward, Texas A&M). He struggled in his junior year due to a knee injury and a coaching change so some where surprised when he declared for the draft. He was on scouts’ radars before that. If he gets healthy and lives up to potential this could be a steal — he is a classic swingman with length, a good first step and the ability to knockdown the midrange jumper. If he gets stronger and adds range to his shot he could be a solid NBA rotation player.

40. Portland Trail Blazers: Will Barton (6’6” shooting guard/small forward, Memphis). He’s a scorer, an inconsisntent one as a freshman but by his sophomore year he seemed to find a midrange and three-point stroke (34.6 percent last season). He needs to put on weight, he needs to be consistent as a pro, but he is smooth and can put up points in the NBA.

41. Portland Trail Blazers: Tyshawn Taylor (6’4” point guard, Kansas). He has been traded to the Brooklyn Nets. Taylor is really a combo guard that is very quick, very athletic plays at a fast pace and may be the best defensive guard in the draft. But he tends to turn the ball over, his decision making isn’t great, and neither is his jump shot. He reportedly did pretty well in workouts.

42. Milwaukee Bucks: Doran Lamb (6’5” shooting guard, Kentucky). Arguably the best pure shooter in this draft, he shot 46 percent from three last season but he can also knock down the midrange. He’s a decent athlete but not special at the NBA level. He isn’t really great at anything but shooting the ball, but scoring will get you paychecks. Good pick this far down the draft.

43. Atlanta Hawks: Mike Scott (6’9” power forward, Virginia). He was the ACC player of the year and has an all around game — he can score inside, knock down threes, is a very good rebounder, plays hard and plays smart. The concern was that he’s not a dynamic athlete for the NBA level and that he would struggle to keep up the guys he’d be matched up against. But in workouts he outplayed guys ranked higher and climbed draft boards.

44. Detroit Pistons: Kim English (6’6” shooting guard/small forward, Missouri). He’s a catch-and-shoot guy in the NBA, and he can’t do much else (like defend or create his own look). But he can shoot — he hit 45 percent from three last season. He has moved quickly up draft boards as teams watched him in workouts.

45. Philadelphia 76ers: Justin Hamilton (7’0″ center, LSU). He’s big and he’s mobile. He’s also very inconsistent in college, he needs to get stronger and there are questions about how he’ll deal with the athletes of the NBA. But he impressed at a few workouts and that got him a look.

46. New Orleans Hornets: Darius Miller (6’7” small forward, Kentucky). He was a good role player in college and teams see the potential for him to continue that in the NBA, ala Danny Green. He has a nice shot and can be a knock down guy from NBA three point range. He’s not going to create his own shot and can’t really defend on the perimeter at the NBA level. But he can shoot.

47. Utah Jazz: Kevin Murphy (6’6″ small forward, Tennessee Tech). He shot the rock very well against lesser competition, scoring 20.6 points per game and shooting 41 percent from three. The question is how he will do against tougher competition in the NBA, he seemed to struggle during the college season with that but he looked good at the Portsmouth Invitational after the season.

48. New York Knicks: Kostas Papanikolaou (6’8” small forward, Greece). Knicks fans at the draft had no idea who he was (and their reaction was great comedy). And they will not for a while — he will spend the next season (at least) to Europe as he does not have a buyout. He impressed at the EuroLeague final four where he was asked to defend Andri Kirilenko. Papanikolaou is a smart, physical player but not terribly athletic (by NBA standards) and he needs to develop range on his shots.

49. Orlando Magic: Kyle O’Quinn (6’10” center, Norfolk State). He’s got the build and athleticism you want in an NBA big man, he can rebound and defend well. He also scores pretty well around the rim. But there are questions both about his commitment to the game, his effort, and his basketball IQ. That said, he had a good NCAA Tournament and reports out of his workouts were all very good. He could grow into being a role player.

50. Denver Nuggets: Izzet Turkyilmaz (7’0″ small forward, Turkey). I got nothing. Looks very thin in the videos. DraftExpress says some teams saw him and thought he’d make a good “stash” pick who could help in a few years. They say he is athletic. Sure.

51. Boston Celtics: Kris Joseph (6’7″ small forward, Syracuse). He’s got solid athleticism and the effort is there. He spent a lot of time on the perimeter last season and found ways to score despite streaky shooting, but that will be harder to do at the NBA level.

52.Golden State Warriors: Ognjen Kuzmic (7’1″ center,Bosnia and Herzegovina). Don’t know much here. DraftExpress said former teammates like him, that he’s got a real center’s body and while not explosive he moves well. He was playing in the Spanish second division, kind of a big leap from there to the NBA.

53. Los Angeles Clippers: Furkan Aldemir (6’9” power forward, Turkey). Don’t be shocked if this pick gets moved. He is a rebounding machine in Europe. He also will stay there for at least a year as he has no out until 2014. Questions abound about what he can do besides crash the boards.

54. Philadelphia 76ers: Tornike Shengelia (6’9” small forward/power forward, Georgia). The Sixers sold the rights to Shengelia to the Brooklyn Nets for cash. Who doesn’t like cash? Shengelia made the first team at adidas EuroCamp, and here is what our own Brett Pollakoff (who was there) said about him: “He showcased a nose for the ball and an ability to do the dirty work inside, along with an energy level and an offensive skill set that’s certainly worth being noticed by NBA scouts.” A guy who needs a steadier shot, he’s a prospect, but maybe helpful a few years down the road.

55. Dallas Mavericks: Darius Johnson-Odom (6’2” shooting guard, Marquette). Dallas sold this pick to the Los Angeles Lakers for cash. Again, who doesn’t like cash? Although his college numbers don’t blow you away, scouts say he can flat out shoot the rock, and at the end of the day that is still the name of the game. He showed pretty well at the Nets combine workout, according to reports. He’s undersized for the two in the NBA (and he’s not a point guard) but he is strong and defends hard. He’ll be a catch-and-shoot guy in the league, but he can do a lot of damage that way.

56: Toronto Raptors: Tomislav Zubcic (6’11” power forward, Croatia). Don’t know much, but reports make it sound like he’s a classic European big who can spot up and shoot from distance, has good handles for a big, can run the floor a little. Don’t expect him to muscle anyone down low and not as athletic as the NBA guys he would face.

57. Brooklyn Nets: Ilkan Karaman (6’9″ small forward, Turkey). He looked pretty athletic at adidas EuroCamp, was able to back guys down inside and step out and knock down threes. He played with intensity.

58. Minnesota Timberwolves: Robbie Hummel (6’9″ small forward, Purdue). He’s not that athletic but he can shoot from range and can pass. He plays a smart game, but would be more of a sniper in the NBA. He’s got to improve his defense if he wants to see the court.

59. San Antonio Spurs: Marcus Denmon (6’3″ shooting guard, Missouri). He’s scored 17.7 points per game for Missouri and he did it efficiently — he can shoot from long range or finish at the rim. Good basketball IQ, doesn’t turn the ball over much. He’s small and not athletic for an NBA level guy, but the Spurs might be a team that can find a use for him.

60. Los Angeles Lakers: Robert Sacre (7’0″ center, Gonzaga). He’s tall, has an NBA body and can score around the rim. Not terribly athletic and he is pretty raw on offense, but he has a few moves. In college he was just bigger and stronger than everyone else, we’ll see what he can do when that is no longer the case.

NBA Draft Winners, Losers: It was a good night in Philadelphia, Minnesota

Getty Images
Leave a comment

Let’s be honest, judging the winners and losers hours after the draft is throwing darts at a board. There are picks and moves we think are smart that turn out to fall flat, and there are picks that are smart we don’t see coming. This year, a lot of people around the league thought that someone in this draft between picks five and 12 would turn out to be a stud — they all have potential and flaws, but who will work and be able to fill in the holes in their game? It’s too early to know.

That doesn’t stop us from making our projections.

Here ar our 2017 NBA Draft winners and losers.

WINNERS:

The Minnesota Timberwolves. When news of them pushing for a Jimmy Butler trade came up, I thought it foolish to give up a lot of quality pieces for a guy not on the timeline with Karl-Anthony Towns. However, this deal was a good one. Minnesota got Butler and the No. 16 pick (Justin Patton) for the No. 7 pick (Lauri Markkanen), Zach LaVine (an athletic two guard coming off an ACL injury), and Kris Dunn (who was unimpressive as a rookie, but maybe bounces back). This is a great deal giving the Timberwolves both another strong defender, someone who knows Tom Thibodeau’s system, and a professional locker room leader. Minnesota now starts Ricky Rubio, Butler, Andrew Wiggins, and Towns, and they look like a playoff team next season.

The Philadelphia 76ers. Unlike a certain GM in Boston, Bryan Colangelo and the Sixers were willing to push their chips into the middle of the table to get their three stars. Now they have it after trading for the No. 1 pick (at a fairly high cost, but if you have the chips this is what they are for). Markelle Fultz was taken with the top pick to go with Ben Simmons (last year’s No. 1) and Joel Embiid. Add in quality players around them like Dario Saric and Robert Covington, and the Sixers potentially have a foundation for greatness. now they just need to keep everyone healthy for a season.

The Sacramento Kings. It seems weird to type this, but they nailed this draft. They got their point guard of the future in De'Aaron Fox (who now gets to go up against Lonzo Ball four times a season — that’s going to be fun). They traded out of the No. 10 pick to get the No. 15 and 20, and they got Justin Jackson and Harry Giles. I’m higher on Jackson than most, but he certainly should be an NBA rotation player. And Giles, if healthy and anywhere near back to form, could be the steal of this draft. Frank Mason was a solid second round get. The Kings were a smart, mature franchise for a night. We’ll see if this is a trend.

Golden State Warriors. They didn’t have a pick in this draft, but they bought one early in the second round to land Jordan Bell (Long Beach Poly shout out). He showed in the NCAA tournament against Kansas he showed how he is a fierce defender of multiple positions (and he did the same at the combine). He’s athletic, has an NBA body, but he can score a little around the basket or from farther out if left wide open — and on the Warriors he’ll be left wide open. Bell is a nice player but this is a perfect fit.

LOSERS:

The Chicago Bulls. Management deciding it couldn’t build around Jimmy Butler and it was time to move on to a real rebuild is completely legitimate — but then you’ve got to get more back for an All-NBA player who is elite on both ends of the court. Maybe Lauri Markkanen is more than just a stretch four, hopefully, Zach LaVine fully recovers from his ACL injury, and Kris Dunn can’t be a bad as he looked last year — and that’s still not enough. Butler had time left on his contract, there was no rush to get this done, yet the Bulls pulled the trigger on a sub-par package that slows those rebuilding efforts. It was not pretty in the Windy City.

Boston Celtics fans. They were teased all day with dreams of Kristaps Porzingis, or Butler, or Paul George, and in the end they got Jayson Tatum. I like the Celtics’ picks, I think Semi Ojeleye could be a steal in the second round. But all day long Celtics fans were told of big dreams, none of which yet came to pass and Danny Ainge continues to hold on to his chips. Someday he’ll make a move. Probably. But that day is not today.

After trading Jimmy Butler to Minnesota, where do the Bulls go from here?

4 Comments

Jimmy Butler is now a member of the Minnesota Timberwolves. In a draft day trade, the Timberwolves received Jimmy Butler and reunited him with his old coach from Chicago Tom Thibodeau. In exchange for the shooting guard, the Chicago Bulls received the No. 7 overall pick — Chicago took Arizona’s Lauri MarkkanenKris Dunn, and Zach LaVine.

The question now in Chicago is this: now what?

Butler, 27, was the superstar the Bulls needed post-Derrick Rose. Now, with Butler gone, the Bulls will need to rebuild in a year in which they have young assets mixed with older, more expensive players that don’t seem to match up. After a year in which Chicago just barely made the playoffs with the eight seed, they are going to need to readjust their entire roster. That could mean new landing places for Rajon Rondo, Dwyane Wade, and Robin Lopez.

Forget on the on-floor performance for a moment, the real question for Chicago will be how to properly allocate their resources when it comes to salary in the coming season. Wade, 35, will reportedly opt into the final year of his contract to play for his hometown team despite Butler moving to Minnesota. Chicago will earn the right to pay Wade $23.8 million for this upcoming season. Rondo is in much the same boat, with $13.4 million left in the final year of his contract.

From a wins perspective, both players would no doubt be highly crucial to any wins this new Bulls team would garner in the coming season. But both players have a staggering amount of salary left, and would no doubt take up valuable playing time for the young, newly acquired players that the Bulls should want to develop.

The most obvious choice for both Rondo and Wade would be waivers or buyouts. Rondo’s contract only has $3 million left on it if he is bought out before June 30. Despite a solid playoff performance, Rondo does not have a $13 million value to the Bulls in terms of playing time, and they don’t have a need for whatever erratic play he may bring to the table.

While the Butler trade created a $15.3 million exception for the Bulls, Wade’s contract stands as an albatross that is in the way of both free agency this season and extensions for young players in the coming season. Chicago is facing restricted free agency for Nikola Mirotic come July, and will need to figure out what to do with younger players like Michael Carter-Williams and Cristiano Felicio.

After decisions are made this summer for those players, the Bulls will need to figure out how to sign LaVine to an extension. Given the market for players of his caliber and position, LaVine will almost certainly command a number comparable to what Wade’s salary currently occupies on the Chicago cap space.

This is all before we even get to Lopez, who has $26 million left on his contract for the next two seasons. While he is still a productive player, at age 29 it’s unclear at how much Lopez factors into Chicago’s future plans. Given his contract situation it might be better to try to move him as a means to acquire new assets that are closer in age to the Bulls’ new core.

If your head is not spinning by now, you’re one of the lucky ones. It just gets worse from here.

It seems highly probable that Rondo will be waived or bought out in order to minimize the impact he has on the cap this season. He doesn’t glean much on the trade market given his current full contract value, and his an uneasy play (despite his playoff prowess) is something that that has driven potential trade suitors away.

What to do with Wade is an entirely different conversation. If Chicago decided to buy him out this summer it would be a clear choice of direction in terms of both the roster makeup and the playing time allotted to the new young backcourt at the United Center. The Bulls would immediately become ultra flexible, and able to match a restricted offer for Mirotic without fearing any kind of retribution down the line for when they try to sign other players in free agency or offer LaVine an extension.

Then again, they could wait to buy him out until later in the season, say, around the All-Star Game, all the while taking in ticket sales for Chicago fans to see their hometown star. There is no doubt that Wade would be a good influence on younger players in the locker room, despite the high price tag. If they want to buy him out later in the season, he could join another team in time for a playoff run. That might convince Wade to take a larger amount off of his contract come buyout time.

Lost in the sauce of all this contract talk is just what the Bulls are doing with their future. LaVine looked excellent before his ACL injury in 2016-17, and Dunn had promise despite a disappointing first season in Minnesota. By all accounts, the Bulls gave up too much in their trade with the Timberwolves, with most lamenting their decision to send the No. 16 pick to Minnesota despite Chicago giving up the best player in the swap.

There’s also the matter of the Bulls trading Jordan Bell to the Golden State Warriors straight up for cash considerations. Bell was an excellent player at Oregon, and would have a fit right in with Chicago’s new young core. Given that there is an issue with the Chicago front line when it comes to Mirotic’s RFA contract and Felicio’s free agency, the idea that Bell would not have fit in with the young Bulls is sort of baffling.

Yes, Chicago selected Lauri Markkanen with the No. 7 overall pick, but the University of Arizona product is not projected to be enough of a influence to suggest Bell had to be moved. Bell is almost certainly getting sent to the G-League for the Warriors, but he could have played a role for a team in Chicago that needs theirs defined. If the Butler trade was symbolic of their new direction, perhaps the Bell-for-cash swap was most emblematic of how the Bulls do business.

At the end of the day, Chicago’s trade with Minnesota sending Butler back to Thibodeau feels hilariously lopsided, and pushes the full reset for the Bulls in the years since Rose, Joakim Noah, and Taj Gibson led the team. Unless either LaVine, Markkanen, or Dunn exceed Butler’s performance for Chicago, it’s unlikely that history will look kindly at this trade. When the Bulls brought in Wade and Rondo last season, it looked like the team that once challenged in the Eastern Conference had started their decline. Once Rondo and Wade are gone, we’re likely to see the bottom for Chicago.

2017 NBA Draft pick-by-pick tracker with analysis of each move

Associated Press
9 Comments

Already the 2017 NBA Draft has been crazy — the No. 1 pick was traded for only the seventh time in NBA history. The No. 2 pick from a couple years ago has already been moved to make way for the next No. 2 pick coming to Los Angeles.

Now it is likely to get even wilder.

This is the best place to follow all of it. Just keep hitting refresh all night.

We will constantly be updating this post throughout the course of the night — it will be live with a quick analysis of every pick and how they fit in with the team that took them. We’ll also be on top of trades and everything else happening around the NBA tonight. About the only thing we know is what’s happening now with the No. 1 pick, so let’s put the Sixers on the clock.

 
Sixers small icon 1. Philadelphia 76ers: Markelle Fultz, 6’4” point guard (Washington). The Sixers hope they have their big three rounded out with Fultz. One scout I trust told me this was a one-player draft at the top — Fultz was clear and away the best guy available. What doesn’t he do well offensively? He can score off the pick-and-roll from all three levels: He makes threes, can hit mid-range pull-ups, or attack and finish above the rim. He can make plays in transition, makes good decisions off the pick-and-roll, uses both hands, and had great body control and footwork. The concerns are he can be passive, lets the game come to him a little too much, and can be a lazy defender (despite elite physical tools). Stlll, he was the clear No. 1 for a reason.

 
Lakers small icon 2. Los Angeles Lakers: Lonzo Ball, 6’6” point guard (UCLA). You can’t teach his court vision and passing skills, which remind one of a LeBron/Ricky Rubio level of passer. With those skills, he is amazing in the open court. Yes, his shot is awkward (because of it he can’t pull up going to his right well), but in catch-and-shoots the ball goes in. Concerns about his shot – and his father — are overblown. The real questions are how he defends at the next level (he was disinterested for long stretches in college), and can he create in the halfcourt (he didn’t do a lot of pick-and-rolls, and on them 75 percent of his drives ended with a pass, he has to be more of a scoring threat).

WE HAVE A TRADE: The Chicago Bulls are sending Jimmy Butler to play with his old coach Tom Thibodeau in Minnesota.

Minnesota gets Butler plus the 16th pick in this draft in exchange for Zach LaVine, Kris Dunn, and the No. 7 pick in this draft. That is a great deal for Minnesota. They now can start Ricky Rubio, Jimmy Butler, Andrew Wiggins, Karl-Anthony Towns, and they look like a playoff team.

 
Celtics small icon 3. Boston Celtics: Jayson Tatum, 6’8” forward (Duke). Maybe the player most ready to contribute offensively immediately in this draft, Tatum is a fantastic isolation scorer. He has a diverse offensive skill set, and he blew by bigger defenders in college with a strong face-up game, but will that translate to the NBA where everyone is more athletic? Can he score against NBA wings? His perimeter shot is improved but needs to get better still. He also was not a consistent defender in college, he needs to be much better now, especially if he wants to play much for Brad Stevens. Still, this guy can help right now, which is good for Boston.

 
Suns small icon4. Phoenix Suns: Josh Jackson, 6’8” forward (Kansas). Physically, and with his explosiveness, he reminds one a little of Andrew Wiggins — and Jackson has the same issue of a very inconsistent shot. Effort is a skill and one Jackson has plenty of, he outworks everyone, and could become and elite wing defender in the NBA. He had success offensively in college overwhelming opponents as a small-ball four, and he works well off the ball with cuts or getting out in transition. While his shot found a groove late in the season he needs more consistent mechanics, that shot needs work. Plenty of scouts think he has one of highest potential ceiling in this class.

 
Kings small icon 5. Sacramento Kings: De’Aaron Fox, 6’4” point guard (Kentucky). Kings’ fans, check out our feature on Fox to learn more about him. He climbed draft boards through the season and more once he got to workouts. Fox is incredibly fast with and without the ball — elite NBA level fast, and that makes him dangerous, particularly in transition. He’s a good (not great) passer, but his shot needs work (reports from workouts are that it is improving). He is a good defender (just ask Lonzo Ball) with the potential to be great. He needs to get stronger, and he needs to polish his offensive game, particularly running the pick-and-roll.

 
Magic small icon 6. Orlando Magic: Jonathan Isaac, 6’11” forward (Florida State). One of the highest ceilings in this draft — if he can be developed. He can hit threes, but is very raw and needs confidence on that end. Maybe of more interest to the Magic, his floor is pretty high thanks to his defense — he had a 25% defensive rebound percentage, a 2.4 percent steal rate, and a 6 percent block percentage, only done by Anthony Davis, Andre Roberson, Dewayne Dedmon, and Aaric Murray since 09-10 (stat via Sam Vecenie). He’s a project but could be a key part of the future new management in Orlando is trying to build.

 
Bulls small icon 7. Chicago Bulls (via Minnesota in Butler trade): Lauri Markkanen, 7’0” power forward/center (Arizona). The Bulls need shooting and they get it here. Markkanen is a stretch 4/5 who shot 42.3 percent from three — and not just spot-ups. He can come off screens, is dangerous in pick-n-pops, and can just generally shoot the rock. He needs to get stronger, and become a much better rebounder and defender. If he doesn’t, he’s kind of a Ryan Anderson type. Is only third player from Finland ever to make NBA.

 
Knicks small icon 8. New York Knicks: Frank Ntilikina, 6’5” point guard (France). He’s a big point guard with length, and in international tournaments he has been a defensive force. That caught scouts’ eyes, but so did his ability to run the team. He has shown development on the offensive end with an improved jumper. His game needs polish, and there are questions about his ceiling, but with his size and defense his floor is higher than some others in this draft range. We’ll see how he fits in the triangle, but he’s a high IQ player.

 
Mavericks small icon 9. Dallas Mavericks: Dennis Smith Jr., 6’3” point guard (North Carolina State). Dallas needed a point guard and they may have the one of the fututre. He had an inconsistent season, but the good news is he didn’t lose any athleticism from the ACL injury a couple of years back. He’s a powerful and explosive scorer, he’s talented in open floor, an impressive playmaker, and on paper has all the skills you want at the point. However, his decision making is very inconsistent — he chooses passes poorly, picks up his dribble at poor times — plus he’s got to be much better defensively.

WE HAVE A TRADE: Sacramento is rebuilding and wants to restock, Portland needs a big who can space the floor behind (and next to maybe) Jusuf Nurkic, so we have a trade.

 
Blazers small icon 10. Portland Trail Blazers (from Sacramento via trade): Zach Collins, 7’0” forward/center (Gonzaga). Few climbed the draft board more in the past month than Collins. Big men who can space the floor are in demand, and he shot 45 percent from three this season. He also was fantastic against elite players in the NCAA Final Four, which helped his cause. He’s got to get stronger to be able to handle NBA players on the defensive end. Also, he’s not athletic or fleet of foot, so if teams can draw him defensively out on the perimeter it’s an issue. Still, big men who can shoot the rock are the way the league is going and he can do it.

 
Hornets small icon 11. Charlotte Hornets: Malik Monk, 6’3” shooting guard (Kentucky). While he can be streaky, he’s an insane scorer and athlete who can fill it up like nobody else in this draft. How he will fit off the ball with Kemba Walker is a question mark (especially defensively, but he can get them buckets. The question is can he do anything other than score? He’s not been much of a defender (and he’s a bit small for an NBA two guard), he’s not a shot creator for others, nor does he rebound much. He’s kind of a scoring, volume-shooting sixth man kind of guy, think Jamal Crawford or Lou Williams.

 
Pistons small icon 12. Detroit Pistons: Luke Kennard, 6’6” shooting guard (Duke). Maybe the best pure shooter in this draft. More than just spot up, he can read screens, he’s got excellent footwork and jab series, and he’s better on the P’n’R than people realize. He’s not a great athlete so there are questions about his ability to create space for his shot. However, the bigger questions are about his defense and ability to hang with two guards at the next level (he’s not a great athlete, nor is he long).

WE HAVE A TRADE: Denver has traded the No. 13 pick the Utah Jazz

 
Jazz small icon 13. Utah Jazz (from Denver via trade): Donovan Mitchell, 6’3” shooting guard (Louisville). He’s a bit time athlete, with a 6’10” wingspan, and with all that he defends very well. That should get him run as a rookie. He has improved as a play maker, but what is his role — he was at his best last season when the Louisville PG was out injured and Mitchell had the ball in his hands. His decision making and shooting need to get far more consistent.

 
Heat small icon 14. Miami Heat: Bam Adebayo, 6’10” center (Kentucky). He’s a little small for an NBA center, but he’s physically strong enough to hold his own in the post. Defensively he’s not much of a rim protector, but if you drag him out into a pick-and-roll he can switch and defend guards well. Very limited offensive game, it’s all dunks that he gets in transition or on offensive rebounds, he’s improved on the glass and is solid there now.

 
Kings small icon 15. Sacramento Kings (via trade with Portland): Justin Jackson, 6’8” small forward (North Carolina). An All-American wing with an all-around game — including drawing some of the toughest defensive assignments for the Tar Heels. He can shoot the three, hits from the midrange, is good on the catch-and-shoot now, and has as impressive a floater as you will see. The concerns at the next level are he needs to get stronger, plus he’s not a great pick-and-roll ball handler.

 
timberwolves small icon 16. Minnesota Timberwolves (via trade with Chicago): Justin Patton, 7’0” center (Creighton). He’s got good tools — he’s a fantastic aathlete for his size and can rim run with the best — but is a project. He put up good offensive numbers but can’t create for himself, so when Creighton lost its point guard his production took a hit. The big questions are about toughness — will he play through contact? Will he be a physical defender? Plenty of potential but plenty of work to do.

 
Bucks small icon 17. Milwaukee Bucks: D.J. Wilson, 6’10” power forward (Michigan). He had flashes last season that make him an intriguing prospect as a stretch-four. He has the size and perimeter skills, was a fantastic finisher around the basket, but was a late bloomer who battled injuries, so it can be hard to read his potential. He’s not physical and with that, not much of a rebounder. He’s going to have to show more toughness to thrive at the next level.

 
Pacers small icon 18. Indiana Pacers:. T.J. Leaf, 6’10” power forward (UCLA). A fluid athlete who excelled in transition (and thrived with Lonzo Ball’s passing), he will thrive with an up-tempo team. He also shot 46.6% from three, but didn’t take many, still he could develop into a stretch four. The questions are will he grow his game to work in a half-court offense, and how he will defend (he’s not quick laterally, nor is he physical)? He’s not a bad rebounder. Could thrive with a running second unit while he develops.

 
Hawks small icon 19. Atlanta Hawks: John Collins, 6’10” power forward (Wake Forest). He is a young sophomore, which is good because it means he can develop — and he needs to. He’s become an extremely efficient offensive weapon — 67% true shooting percentage, highest PER in college — who is fantastic in the post, but can he pass? He pulled down defensive rebounds, but he’s not long and scouts question if he is a defensive playmaker. He didn’t seem to have much feel for the game on that side of the ball (which often led to foul trouble).

 
Kings small icon 20. Sacramento Kings (via trade with Portland): Harry Giles, 6’11’ center (Duke). He was the highest-ranked freshman in his class, then the injuries hit — ACL, MCL and Meniscus tears in his left knee that have required a couple of surgeries, plus another surgery on his right knee. Is he broken now? Or, because of all the missed time did that just set back his skill development, confidence, and understanding of where to be on the court (particularly on defense). Find his old physical self, then restore his confidence, and this could be the steal of the draft. But he may never be the same again.

 
Thunder small icon 21. Oklahoma City Thunder: Terrance Ferguson, 6’7” shooting guard (born in US, played last season in Australia). He’s an athletic wing player who decided to get paid to play overseas rather than play college ball stateside. He was a very good shooter, particularly spot up, in high school, but he struggled a little with that overseas (31.3% from three last year). That said he was handed a big role in a league with men and played well. His ball handling has to improve, and he needs to get stronger, and he needs to be more consistent on defense.

 
Nets small icon 22. Brooklyn Nets: Jarrett Allen, 6’11” center (Texas). With Brook Lopez traded, Allen is going to get some run. If you like tall, wildly athletic but incredibly raw big men, Allen is your guy. He may be the definition of project big. He has all the physical tools to be a Clint Capela kind of player, but does he love basketball enough to put in the work and get there? It’s a little hard to read his college production numbers because he was paired with another non-shooting big on a team without the ability to space the floor. Still, he could rim run in transition, and develop into a good pick-and-roll big.

 
Raptors small icon 23. Toronto Raptors: O.G. Anunoby, 6’8” forward (Indiana). On paper he’s everything NBA teams look for in big wings: Can play the 3 or 4, is an elite level defender (when focused), he can make threes (when given time to set his feet), and he’s super athletic. Maybe he develops into a Trevor Ariza type. The questions start with how he comes off an ACL injury. His jumper needs to be more consistent, he hit threes (36% in college) but shot 52% from the free throw line, which is a concern. The other big question is how hard he plays night in and night out — it wasn’t consistent in college.

 
Nuggets small icon 24. Denver Nuggets (via trade with Utah Jazz): Tyler Lydon, 6’10 forward (Syracuse). He shot 39.2% from three last season, so the logical conclusion is he should be a stretch four in the NBA. He can also run the floor in transition, and post up smaller defenders, but his jumper is his best weapon. The problem is he’s not particularly long nor particularly athletic for an NBA stretch four. There are questions about his defense, particularly coming out of the Syracuse zone. Scouts were really divided on Lydon and if his game translates.

WE HAVE A TRADE: Philadephia jumps back into the first round to get a quality big man who could back up Joel Embiid.

 
Sixers small icon 25. Philadelphia 76ers (via trade with Orlando): Anzejs Pasecniks, 7’2” center (Latvia). Just because he’s a 7’2” center from Latvia, don’t think he’s the next Kristaps Porzingis. That said, he’s good. Pasecniks played well and was very efficient last season in Spain, the second best league in the world. He moves well for a big man which makes him dangerous as the roll man. He’s got work to do on his outside shot, but there is potential there. He’s a bit raw but this could be steal this low if he develops.

 
Blazers small icon 26. Portland Trail Blazers: Caleb Swanigan, 6’9” power forward/center (Purdue). He transformed his body losing more than 100 pounds, and with that transformed himself into an NBA prospect. He’s strong and bullied people in the post on offense, plus he shot 44.7 percent from three. Teams like his work ethic. That said he’s not fast, he turns the ball over far too much, he’s not strong on the defensive end, and all of that leads to questions of where he fits in an NBA game. He’s young and has room to improve.

 
Lakers small icon 27. Los Angeles Lakers (via trade with Brooklyn): Kyle Kuzma, 6’9” power forward (Utah). He has the physical tools of a modern NBA four, with his 7-foot wingspan, versatile offensive game, he can play in transition, and he passes well. He’s not a bad three-point shooter (32 percent last year) but he has to be better to thrive in the NBA. He’s also got to be much better defensively. Kuzma has potential, but it’s going to take work on his part to thrive at the next level.

WE HAVE A TRADE: Utah traded away a late first round pick, now they pick up another one.

 
Jazz small icon 28. Utah Jazz (from LA Lakers via trade): Tony Bradley, 6’10” center (North Carolina). He was stuck behind some older, more experienced big men at North Carolina, limiting him to14.5 minutes per game this season, and he’s seen as a bit of a project. He’s tall, long (7’5” wingspan), plays with a high motor, and has a nice shooting stroke. However, he’s not a fantastic athlete, which worries teams. He could be a candidate for a two-way contract, but either way, he likely will spend time in the G-League developing next season.

 
Spurs small icon 29. San Antonio Spurs:. Derrick White,6’5” guard (Colorado). One of the best stories in the draft: he had no D1 college offers and just one D2, but he grew five inches at D2 school and eventually transferred to Colorado, only to make first team all Pac-12. He’s a combo guard who shot 40% from three and had 4.3 assists per game – he can shoot and create. He’s got a 6’8” wingspan which helps him make plays on defense. He’s a 23-year-old senior who may not develop much more than what we see early, but he could provide solid minutes off the bench as a rookie.

 
Lakers small icon 30. Los Angeles Lakers (via trade with Utah): Josh Hart, 6’5” shooting guard (Villanova). You may remember him from Villanova’s title run, he entered the draft last year but pulled out and returned to college. He improved his shooting, knocking down 40 percent from three last season, although he’s a spot-up guy not someone who pulls up off the dribble. He works well off screens. He’s a high IQ player. The challenge for him is he’s an average athlete by NBA standards, on offense will he be able to create space for his shot? Defensively he tries hard, he’s intense, but can he hang with better athletes night in and night out?

SECOND ROUND

 
Hornets small icon 31. Charlotte Hornets (via Atlanta in Dwight Howard trade): Frank Jackson, 6’4” shooting guard (Duke). Update: Jackson has been traded to the New Orleans Pelicans. Mike Krzyzewski’s team was loaded with quality shooting guards last season, but Jackson’s skills carved out a niche and 10.9 points per game. He’s got good length (6’7” wingspan) and is an explosive athlete (42 inch vertical) that helps him create space. He shot 39.5 percent from three but is more dangerous when he attacks straight line off the dribble because he’s strong and can finish. He’s not a playmaker for others, just himself, and there are questions about his defense going against other good athletes at the NBA level.

 
Suns small icon32. Phoenix Suns: Davon Reed, 6’6″ shooting guard (Miami of Florida). He has the potential to be a quality “3&D” guy in the NBA. Defensively he has a 7-foot wingspan and put in a lot of effort at the defensive end in college, and he’s the kind of fluid athlete NBA teams want. The senior shot 37.9 percent from three last season. The question is will he be athletic enough to do all that at the NBA level. Teams weren’t sure and that’s why he fell this far, plus as a senior there are questions about how much he develops.

 
Magic small icon 33. Orlando Magic: Wesley Iwundu, 6’7” shooting guard/wing (Kansas State). There are some things to like such as good size and length for a wing (7’1” wingspan), he’s got handles and can create shots, maybe even play some point, and he’s versatile defensively and can switch. He’s also a senior, so he’s older and farther along the development curve, he lacks polish on offense. Also, while he shot 37.6 percent from three, he needs consistency on shot. Can he get strong enough to defend NBA wings?

 
Kings small icon 34. Sacramento Kings: Frank Mason, 6’0” point guard (Kansas). The 2017 College Basketball Player of the Year, he averaged 20.3 points per game and shot 47.1 percent from three. He’s explosive attacking the rim, he can score a variety of ways, and he’s a strong floor general. Why is he being taken this late? Because he’s 6-foot in shoes, and there are real questions about how much that limits him on defense. He also needs to be a more consistent decision maker. He could be a steal this late as a second-team playmaking point guard.

 
Magic small icon 35. Orlando Magic: Ivan Rabb, 6’10” power forward/center (California). He’s this year’s cautionary tale: last year he was a potential lottery pick, certainly first rounder, yet he returned to Cal without testing the draft waters, and he fell way down the board because he didn’t show much improvement. He averaged 14 points a game, shot 40 percent from three, and can be a beast on the boards, but it can be hard to read his potential out of the mess that was the Cal offense. Is he a four or a five?

 
Sixers small icon 36. Philadelphia 76ers: Jonah Bolden, 6’10” power forward (Australia). He played a little at UCLA a year ago before heading to the Adriatic league for last season, where he won their equivalent of Rookie of the Year. He’s got the physical tools — size, reported 7’3” wingspan, athletic — and he hit 40 percent from three last season. He’s got a well-rounded offensive game and defensive potential. That said his decision making is often suspect, and that leads to consistency issues on both ends. His confidence seems to get shaken at times, and the NBA will test that.

 
Celtics small icon 37. Boston Celtics: Semi Ojeleye, 6’7” forward (SMU). Great pick this late in the draft, potential steal of the night. He spent one season at Duke as an undersized energy/athlete off the bench, then transfered to SMU where he fit better as a stretch-four, but can he play that at the next level? He’s a very good shooter, hitting 42.5% from three (he can shoot off the catch or off the bounce), plus he’s an impressive athlete (40.5 inch vertical) with a strong work ethic. The questions start with how does he adapt his game to the NBA? He’s not going to be able to be a four, but maybe he thrive as a three.

 
Bulls small icon 38. Chicago Bulls: Jordon Bell, 6’9” power forward (Oregon). UPDATE: Bell has been sold to the Golden State Warriors. Could be great pick this late. The NCAA Tournament can be overrated as a scouting tool, but NBA scouts noticed his defensive performance against Kansas — he was dominant. He did the same thing at the 5-on-5 portion of the NBA Draft Combine. He is very athletic, which should help his transition to the next level. While he has an NBA body, he is offensively very raw and unpolished (there is potential there as a guy who can score around the basket, but a lot of work needs to be done).

 
Clippers small icon 39. LA Clippers (via trade with the Philadephia 76ers). Jawun Evans, 6’1” point guard (Oklahoma State). He basically was the Oklahoma City offense last season. His strength was as a pick-and-roll point guard who passed out of that well and found the open man, he was able to score out of it as well in college but can he finish against NBA length? He shot 37 percent from three, but there are questions about how good a shooter he ultimately is. Works hard on the defensive end, but he’s not big or especially athletic so how does he do against NBA level guards?

 
Hornets small icon 40. Charlotte Hornets (via trade with New Orleans Pelicans): Dwyane Bacon, 6’6″ small forwawrd (Florida State). He has a 6’10” wingspan and passes the NBA wing eye test. He scored impressively in transition last season but has a more rounded offensive game than that and can get a team buckets. He just knows how to score when he attacks. His jumper is inconsistent (33 percent from three last season) and he’s not a focused defender. Is he enough of an athlete for the NBA level.

 
Hawks small icon 41. Atlanta Hawks: Tyler Dorsey, 6’4” shooting guard (Oregon). He probably helped his way into the second round with a fantastic performance in the NCAA Tournament. He’s a very good shooter, hitting 42.4 percent from three. He reinforced his ability to score from deep at the NBA Draft Combine where he shot 56 percent from three. The problem is he’s small for a two guard at the next level, and he doesn’t have the athleticism to cover for it. Maybe he can still get off his shot, but can he defend?

 
Lakers small icon 42. Los Angeles Lakers (via trade with Utah Jazz): Thomas Bryant, 6’10” center (Indiana). He’s a project, but he has the physical tools teams look for in a big man — he measured to have a 7’6 wingspan and a 9’4.5 standing reach at the combine. He runs the floor well, plays with a high motor (which makes him good on the offensive glass), and the potential to be a force around the rim popped up in flashes. But his efficiency dipped his sophomore season, he turns the ball over too much, and there are questions about how his game translates to the next level. Can he score consistently and defend well against NBA size and length?

 
Rockets small icon 43. Houston Rockets:
Isaiah Hartenstein, 7’0” power forward/center (played in Lithuania last season). What to like here starts with the physical profile — he has the build of an NBA center. He’s played professionally in Europe against men, he knows hot to be physical. He’s got a decent shot, although not from more than the midrange. He’s not got a go-to offensive play, and his defense is spotty. There’s potential as he develops, but it will take a little time.

 
Knicks small icon 44. New York Knicks: Damyean Dotson, 6’5″ shooting guard (Houston). He earned his way into the second round with a strong performance at the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament, then the NBA Draft Combine. He started his college career at Oregon but was released from there due to sexual assault allegations. He can score slashing to the basket and shot 44 percent from three last season — he can be a guy that gets a team buckets. He’s not a guy who can create shots well, and his defense is going to have to improve to stick at the NBA level.

 
Rockets small icon 45. Houston Rockets:
Dillon Brooks, 6’7” forward (Oregon). The Pac 12 Player of the year, he may be a little undersized (6’6” wingspan), and not the most athletic guy on the board, but he’s a fiery competitor and that showed against North Carolina in the NCAA Tournament. Brooks is a player who is good at everything but not really great at any one thing, which makes teams cautious. To be effective at the NBA level he’s got to improve his outside shooting and be more consistent.

 
Bucks small icon 46. Milwaukee Bucks (via trade from Philadelphia): Sterling Brown, 6’6” shooting guard (SMU). He’s the brother of former NBA player Shannon Brown. An under-the-radar guy (no NBA Draft Combine invite), he shot 44 percent from three last season, and with a 6’10 wingspan and solid build he has an NBA body. He’s got a versatile game, the questions are how his offense translates to the next level. He struggled to finish against length, and wasn’t consistent creating his own shot.

 
Pacers small icon 47. Indiana Pacers:. Ike Anigbogu, 6’10 center (UCLA). Great pick up this late in the draft, could be a steal. He’s not the tallest center, but the 7’6” wingspan and his physical strength make up for that. He’s also a quick, explosive leaper, which makes him a strong defender as both a shot-blocker and an active rebounder. On the other end, Anigbogu needs polish and a perimeter game, but he’s got good hands and knows how to finish lobs/dunks (especially in transition, he runs well), plus he can be a beast on the offensive glass. He fills a role in the modern NBA.

 
Clippers small icon 49. LA Clippers (via trade with the Milwaukee Bucks). Sindarius Thornwell, 6’5” shooting guard (South Carolina). He boosted his stock and helped get drafted based on his play in the NCAA Tournament, where he was key for the Game Cocks to get as far as he did. He’s strong, plays a physical game, has three-point shooting range, has a good basketball IQ, and plays hard. That might make him a fan favorite at Summer League, his average athleticism and lack of explosiveness had teams concerned about what he can do at the next level.

 
Nuggets small icon 49. Denver Nuggets: Vlatko Cancar, 6’8″ power forward (Slovenia). He’s a stretch four and role player at the NBA level. He’s got good size and a 6’11” wingspan, but what really matters is he can shoot the rock — 43 percent from three last season. He’s going to have to get stronger, then prove he can defend at the NBA level to stick. He played at a high level in Europe and could stay there to develop more.

 

 
Sixers small icon 50. Philadelphia 76ers: Mathias Lessort, 6’9” power forward/center (France). He had a strong season in the French League and the FIBA Champions’ league. He plays with high energy, and that helps make up for the fact he’s undersized by NBA standards (so does the 7’1” wingspan). He is an explosive athlete and uses that on defense and the glass well. He has the body of an NBA four but plays like a center and has to be close to the basket, he has very little shooting range.

 
Nuggets small icon 51. Denver Nuggets: Monte’ Morris, 6’3″ point guard (Iowa State). He’s a high IQ player who knows hot to run a team and doesn’t make mistakes — he led the NBA in assist-to-turnover ratio three years in a row. He’s an okay shooter, but needs to improve. He’s an average athlete and that leads to defensive question marks. Also, will he be able to finish in the paint againt longer NBA rim protectors? Could become a solid backup point guard.

 
Pacers small icon 52. Indiana Pacers (pick purchased from New Orleans):. Edmond Sumner, 6’5” point guard (Xavier). How healthy is going to get and when can he play? He missed much of his freshman season with knee tendonitis, then tore his ACL during his sophomore campaign and was out the final couple months of the season. When healthy he has the physical tools to hang with any point guard in this draft, and his great first step make him fantastic as a slasher into the paint. However, he has to improve his shooting and his decision making, two things that didn’t get the chance to improve with playing time. A good gamble at this point in the draft.

 
Celtics small icon 53. Boston Celtics: Kadeem Allen, 6’2″ point guard (Arizona). If he sticks in the NBA, it’s because he will be fantastic on the defensive end (and that’s probably why Brad Stevens wanted him). He has a 6’9″ wingspan, and is a physical and irritating defender. He shot 42.7 percent from three last season. He’d be a 3&D point guard (think of the Patrick Beverley role), but that’s a hard one to carve out in the NBA. Especially on a Boston team deep at the guard spot.

 
Suns small icon54. Phoenix Suns: Alec Peters, 6’9” power forward (Valparaiso). He is coming off a stress fracture that ended his season early, the Suns are betting it was something that will not be chronic. He shot 36.9 percent from three, the hope is that he could be kind of a stretch four and a pick-and-pop threat. He plays a smart game. He’s not particularly long or athletic, can he defend at the NBA level? Is his ceiling Doug McDermott?

 
Jazz small icon 55. Utah Jazz: Nigel Williams-Goss, 6’4” point guard (Gonzaga). He is a high-IQ player who orchestrated the Gonzaga attack all the way to the NCAA title game, and he’s a natural leader who has a crafty game. He’s got the intangibles teams look for in a point guard. The challenge is he’s not terribly athletic for the position. He also needs to improve his shooting at the next level. That said, you can see why coaches will like him and may want to find a roster spot for him.

 
Celtics small icon 56. Boston Celtics: Jabari Bird, 6’6″ shooting guard (California). Very highly recruited out of high school, he never quite panned out as expected in Berkley. He’s not afraid to make a play or shoot the ball, and he hit 37 percent from three. He’s good on the catch-and-shoot. However, he’s an average athlete by NBA stanards, so their are defensive concerns, plus he needs to improve his decsion making considerably to stick at the next level.

 
Nets small icon 57. Brooklyn Nets: Aleksandar Vezenkov, 6’9″ forward (Cyprus). This is a draft and stash pick, we’ll see if he ever comes across the ocean to play here. He played for FC Barcelona last season, before that he played in the Greek League. He’s got that experience, and he has great offensive instincts and the ability to just get buckets. He shot 35 percent from three last season. He’s scored well in Europe. The reason he’s this far down the board is a lack of athleticism that makes scouts wonder if he can hang with the NBA game.

 
Knicks small icon 58. New York Knicks: Ogjen Jaramaz, 6’3″ point guard (Serbia). Another draft and stash guy, he was a former teammate of Nikola Jokic and Ivica Zubac in Europe. He impressed at Adidas Eurocamp and that got him here. He’s a good, explosive athlete who thrives pushing the ball in transition. In the half court he can use his athleticism to get to the rim. If he gets stronger and improves to develop a steady jumper he could get a shot in the NBA in a few years.

 
Spurs small icon 59. San Antonio Spurs:. Jarron Blossomgame, 6’7″ forward (Clemson). He has NBA size, including a 6-10 winspan, plus he’s a high-level athlete. He can defend at an NBA level. The knocks are that he will turn 24 by the start of the next NBA season, so there’s limited development we can expect. Also, he shot 44% from three as a junior but just 25% as a senior. He’s not hot a great offensive game and there are questions about how he scores at the next level.

 
Hawks small icon 60. Atlanta Hawks: Alpha Kaba, 6’10” center (France). A draft and stash, he has all the physical tools of an NBA center, starting with that 7’5″ wingpan, and a strong build. He finishes well around the rim, but he’s not an explosive athlete. He can hit the three, but his slow release may not transfer as well to the NBA. He’s also got work to do on the defensive end. He’s a project, but with these physical tools not a bad roll of the dice at 60.

Report: Jazz trade up for Donovan Mitchell, send Trey Lyles to Nuggets

AP Photo/Frank Franklin II
1 Comment

Excluding the big injury question marks of O.G. Anunoby and Harry Giles, Donovan Mitchell was the top prospect available at No. 13 on my board.

The Jazz traded up with the Nuggets to ensure Mitchell didn’t slip further.

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports:

Do the Jazz see Mitchell as a point guard or shooting guard? At point guard: George Hill will be a free agent this summer, but Dante Exum and Raul Neto are under contract. At shooting guard: Utah has Rodney Hood and Alec Burks. If Utah just liked Mitchell’s value and wants to give him a chance to develop and see where it goes, I could get behind that. Perhaps, this is a precursor to another move.

Trey Lyles is a 21-year-old stretch four who still has upside. He joins a group of Denver bigs – Nikola Jokic, Mason Plumlee, Kenneth Faried, Juan Hernangomez – that offer no clear well-meshing tandems.