No surprises in Game 1 as Heat cruise to win over Celtics


The first game of the Eastern Conference Finals went largely as expected. With LeBron James and Dwyane Wade combining for 54 points, and with the Celtics offense being wildly inconsistent, Miami cruised to a 93-79 victory that seemed to see Boston’s worst fears in facing the Heat in this series become reality.

James got going early, outscoring the Celtics by himself in the first period 13-11, while helping his team get out to a 10-point lead after one. Boston climbed back into it in the second by getting balanced scoring from its stars against the Heat’s second unit, with Rajon Rondo, Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett, and Ray Allen combining for 28 of their team’s 35 points in the period.

Unfortunately for Boston, that offensive performance was short-lived, and a complete aberration.

Pierce finished with just 12 points on 5-of-18 shooting; the responsibility of checking James on the defensive end for most of the night clearly took its toll. Allen played more than 38 minutes, but he managed just 1-of-7 shooting, and even more uncharacteristically, missed four of his seven free throw attempts; he’s definitely not right, and the ankle injury is obviously crushing his normally stellar ability to rain down shots at an extremely high percentage.

Garnett was the Celtics best and most consistent offensive player, finishing with 23 points on 9-of-16 shooting. But that’s also telling of Boston’s offensive woes, because when your strongest offensive option is your power forward knocking down long jumpers, it means that nothing is coming easy.

Setting aside Boston’s problems offensively for a moment — which may very well continue for the majority of this series — the team did have some measure of success in two areas. The Celtics limited the Heat’s opportunities in transition, and held Miami to just 10 fast break points. And, the Heat missed 20 of their 25 three-point attempts.

Boston went to a zone defense late, with the game essentially already having been decided. It was successful, and Doc Rivers said afterward that we can expect to see more of it as the series progresses. If Boston can keep Miami from getting into the lane and out in transition, then defensively, the Celtics have a shot to keep the games from getting out of hand and give themselves a fighting chance.

But the reality is that there were times in this game that Boston simply looked gassed defensively. And with the Celtics having no answer to slow James and Wade with individual defenders or with their team defensive schemes, unless they can create some better looks for Allen and Pierce — neither of whom appear to be playing at 100 percent health-wise — this figures to be a very short series, and one that will end in an inevitable return trip to the Finals for the Heat.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?