We’ve reached a point where you pretty much have to say that if the Los Angeles Clippers are going to make their Western Conference Semifinals series into a competitive contest, they’re going to need San Antonio to hurt itself. They’re going to need mistakes, mental breakdowns, missed shots, and some good old fashioned luck. They’re going to need San Antonio to turn into Memphis, essentially, a team that beats itself and can’t catch a break.
Because if they don’t? This thing is over.
The Clippers’ defense has been up and down all season. But against San Antonio, it’s just been out-classed. Danny Green and Gary Neal put up 20 points on them in a game. That can’t happen. Tiago Splitter and Boris Diaw put 25. That can’t happen. The Clippers are getting killed inside and out, and after a Grizzlies series where they honestly defended and closed out on (poor) perimeter shooters, they’ve gotten lost in the whirlwind of San Antonio’s system. It has not gone well.
If they want to turn this around in Game 4, they need better play on both ends. You just can’t see it happening. Chris Paul is not healthy, that’s pretty clear. Neither is Blake Griffin. Throw in the fact that San Antonio’s perimeter defense has helped consistently to attack CP3 with multiple defenders at multiple angles and that, shock of all shocks, Boris Diaw has actually done a fantastic job on Blake Griffin, and the Clippers’ two biggest weapons are out of whack. The Spurs are chasing Mo Williams off his three and into a mid-range jumper, they’re closing out shooters, they’re shutting down first, second, third options.
They’ve been better, is pretty much what I’m saying.
What does Game 3 mean for the Spurs? It essentially guarantees that the Spurs will have rest before the Conference Finals. They’re healthy, so this isn’t key, but it’s always a nice plus. It means there’s no risk involved. The series is over if the the Spurs win Game 3, even if it’s not over. The Clippers are not coming back from a 3-0 deficit. San Antonio doesn’t need this game. They can win the series if the Clippers win the next two. They don’t need the rest. They don’t have to make a statement. Honestly, Game 3 is a bonus game for San Antonio at this point. They’ve proven they’re better, for the whole season, in this series. It’s just a question of how dominant they are when the conference finals hit and if they’ll have spent any time with adversity whatsoever.
Chinese New Year was February 16, and now we’ve rolled over to the Year of the Dog. The NBA has a huge presence internationally in China, and so its video partner across the Pacific put together a compilation video of NBA players wishing people a happy new year.
The only problem? In one cut of the video that has been making the rounds on social media, Philadelphia 76ers guard JJ Redick appears to use a racial slur aimed at those of Chinese descent.
The instance is absent from the official video, but a reaction-style YouTube video captured a different edit of the Year of the Dog video with Redick still in it. Redick appears to say, “I just wanted to wish all the NBA c—k fans in China a very happy Chinese New Year.”
Redick responded on Twitter, saying he was simply tongue-tied.
It’s difficult to judge intention from a distance, but the result is certainly disappointing. Even with Redick’s apology, it seems possible he’s contacted by the league office as part of a disciplinary inquiry.
LOS ANGELES — Going into this season, continuing off the recent past went the Western Conference has been deeper in talent than the East., there was a lot of discussion among fans and media about switching to a 1-16 playoff format that ignores the current conference system.
The league has always balked at that — there is tradition, the conferences play an unbalanced schedule so it’s not a fair matchup now, and travel is an issue — but things have gotten more serious, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said during All-Star weekend.
“That is something that’s gotten serious attention, not just recently, but over the last few years at the league office,” Silver said in an address to the media. “I think, as I’ve said in the past, the obstacle is travel, and it’s not tradition in my mind, at least. It’s that as we’ve added an extra week to the regular season, as we’ve tried to reduce the number of back-to-backs, that we are concerned about teams crisscrossing the country in the first round, for example. We are just concerned about the overall travel that we would have in the top 16 teams.
“Having said that, you also would like to have a format where your two best teams are ultimately going to meet in The Finals, and obviously, if it’s the top team in the East and top team in the West, I’m not saying this is the case this year, but you could have a situation where the top two teams in the league are meeting in the Conference Finals or somewhere else.
“So we’re going to continue to look at that. It’s still my hope that we’re going to figure out ways.”
There is no vote scheduled, no change on the immediate horizon.
The idea of teams playing a more balanced regular season schedule, then having the best 16 teams in the playoffs, is appealing. This season, the Finals should be the Warriors and Rockets, a matchup of the two best teams. Instead, it will be the Western Conference Finals.
Fixing it is not simple. If travel is the concern — having something like the Golden State and Philadelphia in a 2-2-1-1-1 series that drags out in the first or second rounds (if the playoffs started today we would get Boston vs. Portland) — there is no easy answer, short of a Star Trek teleporter. Faster travel across the nation is not on the immediate horizon.
As Silver said, the only real answer would be to build the potential for more time into the schedule. However, the NBA is already starting in mid-October and running through June, how much longer are they really willing to go?
The obvious answer is reducing the number of games, but we know that’s not happening. Don’t expect much of a change here.
LOS ANGELES — Nobody likes the one-and-done rule. Not the NBA owners, not universities, not players, not anyone.
It’s also not likely to change soon.
The NBA and players’ union are discussing the issue — along with NCAA representatives — NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said. But the sides are not near a deal to make changes, whatever they are.
“In terms of the NBA, we’re conflicted, to be honest…” Silver said in his annual address to the media during All-Star weekend. “So we’ve had some meetings with the Players Association where we’ve shared data on success rates of young players coming into the league. We’ve talked a lot about youth development in terms of whether we should be getting involved in some of these young players even earlier than when they come into college.
“And from a league standpoint, on one hand, we think we have a better draft when we’ve had an opportunity to see these young players play an elite level before they come into the NBA.
“On the other hand, I think the question for the league is, in terms of their ultimate success, are we better off intersecting with them a little bit younger? Are we better off bringing them into the league when they’re 18 using our G League as it was designed to be as a Development League and getting them minutes on the court there?”
Right now an NCAA commission, headed by Stanford President and former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice that is looking into this issue and is expected to make recommendations this spring that the league will look at, Silver said.
He added that another consideration is jobs for veteran players — if the NBA went back to a rule that allowed the drafting of 18-year-olds, it could squeeze some veterans out of the league to create roster spots.
While the NBA appears headed eventually toward some version of the “baseball rule” — players can be drafted out of high school but if they go to college they need to stay two or three years at least — don’t expect changes soon.
“So we’re not by any means rushing through this,” Silver said. “I think this is a case where, actually, outside of the cycle of collective bargaining, we can spend more time on it with the Players Association, talking to the individual players, talking to the executive board and really trying to understand the pros and cons of potentially moving the age limit.”
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Lakers forward Channing Frye has undergone an appendectomy.
The team announced Saturday that its new acquisition had the laparoscopic procedure Friday night in Cleveland.
The Lakers say Frye will be re-evaluated after he returns to Los Angeles next weekend.
Frye was spending the All-Star break in Ohio with his family. He was with the Cavaliers before being traded to the Lakers on Feb. 8 along with Isaiah Thomas in exchange for Jordan Clarkson and Larry Nance Jr.
Frye is averaging 4.8 points and 2.4 rebounds per game this season. He has appeared in one game for the Lakers.
“I’m pretty sure (now) that i got my appendix removed I’ll be able to dunk at least 3xs a month now!” Frye tweeted, with the hashtag ItWasWeighingMeDown: