Mark Cuban voted against new labor agreement, explains Mavs’ thinking regarding free agency

5 Comments

The defending champion Dallas Mavericks have been uncharacteristically quiet as free agency in the NBA has reached a fever pitch over the past few days. The team that notoriously has been willing to spend into luxury tax territory hasn’t been connected to any of the top free agents, and in fact, seemed simply uninterested in re-signing Caron Butler (heading to the Clippers) or Tyson Chandler (likely on his way to the Knicks).

Tim MacMahon of ESPNDallas emailed Cuban to ask what was up, and Cuban responded with a detailed and thoughtful answer. Basically, it comes down to the fact that with the changes in the new collective bargaining agreement, Cuban doesn’t believe it’s smart financially to extend everyone and be locked into the same team for the next five years. Some of the relevant passages:

The reality is that in the new system, cap room will have far more value than it had in the past. I realize that everyone is all freaked out about how and where free agents and future free agents are going, but it’s not just about getting one guy.

We are not saving cap room in hope of that one super special free agent being there. It’s about being in the position to improve every year and possibly add some significant, younger players next year and in future years.

What I don’t think people understand is that once a team hits the tax level the ability to improve our team is reduced dramatically. In addition, your ability to make trades is reduced. So basically, if we made the move to keep everyone together with five-year deals, the team we have today is going to be the team we have for the next five years. If we were a young team it would be one thing. But we are not a young team.

In the past, it was different. If we had a problem, I could fix any mistake by having Donnie find a trade and just taking on more money. … That trick doesn’t work any more for teams over the tax. So we have to change our approach.

Sounds like Cuban is actually on the right track here, which is interesting considering his admitted reputation for continuing to throw money at the team’s personnel issues in search of an eventual solution.

But just because Cuban understands the new system and seems to playing within the new rules the right way doesn’t mean he likes it. He told a Dallas radio station on Friday that he was one of five owners who voted against the new collective bargaining agreement — which is also of note because it was supposed to be the small-market owners who didn’t like the deal, not the big spenders like the Mavericks.

If nothing else comes out of the new agreement (competitive balance certainly won’t), the new luxury tax rules that go into effect in its third year are doing their job of scaring owners like Cuban from conducting business as they have in the past.

“If we were able to sign everyone to two-year deals that would have possibly changed things as well, but that wasn’t in the cards either,” Cuban said.

Are Bulls and Dwyane Wade moving toward a buyout?

Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Leave a comment

About a month ago, the Bulls said they hadn’t discussed a buyout with Dwyane Wade.

Have the two sides progressed since?

Nick Friedell of ESPN:

Dwyane Wade isn’t long for the organization’s future and is expected to reach a buyout agreement at some point in the next few months.

Expected by whom?

People with direct knowledge of momentum toward a buyout?

Or everyone who can see that a 35-year-old earning $23.8 million fits poorly on a rebuilding team?

For the Bulls to now drop their biggest name and a large expiring contract that could prove useful in trades should require Wade surrendering a large portion of his salary. He doesn’t sound like someone inclined to do that yet.

A few months is a long time. As long as Wade gets bought out by March 1, he could join another team’s playoff roster. It’d surprise nobody if he gets bought out after the February trade deadline, which we already knew. I don’t see strong indication of something more imminent.

LeBron James’ camp already shooting down leaving-Cavaliers rumor

AP Photo/Tony Dejak
Leave a comment

LeBron James has done a terrible job shooting down rumors about him leaving the Cavaliers

Except this one from Chris Sheridan, who cited a source saying LeBron would “100 percent” leave Cleveland next summer due to a rift with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert.

Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:

Sheridan’s source saying LeBron is leaving doesn’t make that true. But other anonymous sources denying it doesn’t make the denials true, either.

New Orleans Saints fire Pelicans’ team physician

Thomas B. Shea/Getty Images
1 Comment

The Pelicans have been crushed by injuries the last few years.

Why? That’s an incredibly complex question.

But the New Orleans Saints – who share an owner (Tom Benson), a front-office leader (Mickey Loomis) and other staff with the Pelicans – have found culprits for their own injury woes.

Mike Triplett of ESPN:

The Saints have fired team orthopedists Deryk Jones and Misty Suri, per source, after it was discovered that CB Delvin Breaux has a fractured fibula and will require surgery expected to sidelined him for 4-6 weeks. Breaux was originally diagnosed with a contusion

Suri is a Pelicans team physician.

Scott Kushner of The Advocate:

Fairly or not, Suri – after the Saints deemed him unacceptable – will be in the crosshairs if he keeps his job with the the Pelicans and their injury woes continue.

Rumor: LeBron James ‘100 percent’ leaving Cavaliers next summer

Ezra Shaw/Getty Images
13 Comments

Chris Sheridan was ahead of the crowd in 2014, reporting LeBron James would likely leave the Heat for the Cavaliers – which obviously happened.

But Sheridan called it a “90 percent chance,” a small – but large enough – hedge. He also said LeBron would announce the decision on LeBron’s personal website. Of course, LeBron revealed his choice in a Sports Illustrated essay.

So, maybe Sheridan knows what he’s talking about. Maybe he doesn’t.

But the longtime NBA writer just fanned the flames of the already hot LeBron-leaving-Cleveland rumors.

Sheridan:

Of course, the denials came quickly.

There have already been plenty of warning signs about LeBron’s relationship with Cavs owner Dan Gilbert, which didn’t restart in a great place.

It’s entirely believable LeBron would leave Cleveland, in large part due to Gilbert.

But it’s also fun to speculate about that salacious storyline.

Maybe Sheridan or his source got carried away for that very reason. Or maybe they know something.

Neither possibility should be discounted.