Derek Fisher

Winderman: Average NBA player can’t miss full season


In many respects, the resolve of the NBA players’ union is laudable. They insist they will not be railroaded into an owner-friendly agreement just to get back on the court.

Based on the pessimism coming out of Tuesday’s negotiations in New York, we seemingly are back to the notion that nothing gets done until the majority of players face losing their first paycheck of the season on Nov. 15.

But this is no ordinary union. This is a workforce whose average careers are 4 1/2 years. That’s it.

These are not Teamsters looking at 20 years more of company time and then, hopefully, a pension.

So if the owners insist on a 10-year agreement, which does seem a bit extreme considering where the economy stands today and how it figures to change appreciably over the next decade, then what if the first five years or so are relatively favorable to the players, with givebacks, such as a phased-in hard cap, coming on the back end?

If each agent’s assignment is to work in the best interest of each individual player, then the majority of players represented today would have moved on by the time the harshest of new measures come into play.

“That’s true if you’re only representing rank-and-file players,” one agent said Tuesday, after talks broke off between the league and union. “But those with the influence aren’t only representing the rank and file.”

Fine. Let’s put aside the agent aspect.

Lose the season and for a significant number of players it means a loss of 20 percent of possible career earnings. Even the most favorable union proposal would be hard pressed to recoup such losses.

While the focus of the lockout to this point has been on where Durant, LeBron or Carmelo will play their next exhibition, for players such as that, the long-term implications of these talks are significant. Players in that talent/youth metric are in line for another high-end contract. Maintaining the high end clearly is in their best interest, even if part or all of their 2011-12 earnings are sacrificed.

But unlike the salary cap itself, or at least the way salary cap is divided on most rosters, the decision on whether to move forward on an agreement remains a one-player, one-vote proposition.

That makes this the rare NBA case when a 12th man has as much impact as an All-Star.

From the start, this never has been a matter of whether the NBA would win, but rather an issue of to what degree.

For the majority of NBA players, careers are highly perishable commodities. It is one thing for an autoworker or longshoreman to stand in arms alongside a brother in a multi-decade relationship.

But in the NBA, one draft class already is poised to challenge for jobs, with a chance another joins in the challenge before this is resolved.

The very players who insist on standing united today could be players who find themselves standing on the outside even if gains are made through a protracted lockout.

Ira Winderman writes regularly for and covers the Heat and the NBA for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. You can follow him on Twitter at

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?