team maloof with stern

Mayor Kevin Johnson releases arena funding report, will the Maloofs and NBA bite?

Leave a comment

The plight of Kings fans, who came within an inch of losing their only major professional sports team, may be coming to a crossroads today, when the Think Big Sacramento coalition led by mayor Kevin Johnson releases their arena funding proposal to the public. All they have to do is come up with a plan to raise $387 million that keeps everyone happy. No biggie.

Sacramento Bee columnist Marcos Breton got the scoop on it, and released his report in the early morning hours on Thursday:

What is the guiding principle of Sacramento’s new plan?

That’s right: A virtual split – this time in thirds – among the private interests of an arena, the public and the arena’s patrons….

What you will see in today’s arena presentation are plans for three different funding pots to generate the $387 million or more needed to get an arena built. According to people familiar with the document, the Kings, the NBA and a private developer would contribute $91 million to $156 million in lease payments, upfront money, land and other revenue to pay for an arena.

The city of Sacramento would contribute the sale of public land, a tax on hotels and taxis, and money from items such as digital advertising and parking valued at $94 million to $123 million.

And, while residents in the six-county Sacramento region will not be asked to raise their taxes to subsidize a new arena, patrons of the venue will help pay for it. The third pot of money will be fueled by ticket surcharges, naming rights and other revenue sources that could generate $90 million to $121 million.

Kings fans and those tracking how and why the NBA operates the way it does will want to watch how the parties react to this report. Much of the Think Big Sacramento campaign has been orchestrated to a presidential degree, leaving no doubt to the positions of the heavy hitters involved – including companies such as AEG, the ICON-David Taylor group, and of course, the NBA and the Maloofs.

The Maloofs appear to be impotent in this discussion, as some league insiders have openly acknowledged that their future in the NBA will be determined by their ability to get an arena deal done.

The bottom line with this report is that the Kings and the NBA have been asked to foot a third of the cost. Whether that amount will be amicable to them given the whirlwind of interests controlling the matter is entirely debatable. On one hand, NBA owners do not want to see the league telling them what to do, and on the other hand, the Lakers, Knicks, and Bulls of the league don’t want to hear that (allegedly) broke owners can move into their backyard.

And, separately, while arena subsidy opponents scream blood murder, the reality is that top-flight cities have no leverage. They can clamor for leagues and owners to pay their own bills, but the folks in Sacramento would have to do that with an Anaheim Royals press release wiping their tears.

As for the Maloofs being able to contribute rental payments and/or in general, they recently liquidated their majority interest in the Palms Casino down to 2 percent with the option to buy back another 18 percent, in a financial transaction that could easily pave the way for another (Ron Burkle) speculator to come in and take over their team if they get elbowed out. They continue to assert their leverage, albeit with more discretion than they have used in the past, but in reality, David Stern knows where the bodies are buried. And as SB Nation’s Tom Ziller points out, the NBA has been working diligently to get an arena deal done – so they’re not going to stand for grandstanding when diplomacy is needed.

My take – we’re looking at a firm but fair offer from the City of Sacramento. They’re strapped just like most American cities, and this is their first offer. If this dance plays out like every other negotiation we’ve been witness to in our lives, expect the Maloofs and/or the NBA to say that the city’s request is ‘over the top,’ and they’ll waltz to equilibrium.

Kyle Lowry to critical DeMar DeRozan: ‘Every shot you shoot is a bad shot, analytic-wise’ (video)

Leave a comment

Your reminder that Kyle Lowry and DeMar DeRozan are the best together.

DeRozan was asked about Lowry’s long 3-pointers after the Raptors’ win over the Timberwolves last night.

  • DeRozan: “”Them shots be lucky. … To me, it’s a bad shot.”
  • Lowry (off camera): “Every shot you shoot is a bad shot, analytic-wise.”

That’s not quite what the analytics say, but I won’t let the facts get in the way of a superb diss.

Gregg Popovich pins Spurs’ effort problems on players: ‘I don’t remember playing tonight’ (video)

San Antonio Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich gives instructions against the Detroit Pistons in the first half of a preseason NBA basketball game in Auburn Hills, Mich., Monday, Oct. 10, 2016. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
AP Photo/Paul Sancya
2 Comments

The Spurs fell behind by 18 and eventually lost to the Bulls, 95-91, last night – which begged the question:

Does San Antonio coach Gregg Popovich bear any responsibility for his team’s lack of early intensity?

Jabari Young of the San Antonio Express-News:

Popovich:

I don’t remember playing tonight. I didn’t play. Guys get a lot of money to be ready to play. No Knute Rockne speeches. It’s your job. If you’re a plumber and you don’t do your job, you don’t get any work. I don’t think a plumber needs a pep talk. If a doctor botches operations, he’s not a doctor anymore. If you’re a basketball player, you come ready. It’s called maturity. It’s your job.

Like it or not, motivation is part of an NBA coach’s job.

But that’s also precisely what Popovich is doing.

His credentials dwarf any other coach’s. He can play to his own ego and absolve himself of responsibility – and players will seek to please him. His years of success have earned him the ability to motivate this way, a method no other coach could use without alienating his team.

Donatas Motiejunas signing four-year, $35 million contract with Rockets

DENVER, CO - MARCH 07:  Donatas Motiejunas #20 of the Houston Rockets is helped to his feet by teammates James Harden #13 and Patrick Beverley #2 of the Houston Rockets at Pepsi Center on March 7, 2015 in Denver, Colorado. The Rockets defeated the Nuggets 114-100. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)
Doug Pensinger/Getty Images
1 Comment

Once the Rockets let Donatas Motiejunas back into free agency, this was only a matter of time.

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports:

This sounds remarkably similar to the salaries and incentives set in the original offer sheet from the Nets. But remember, the Rockets didn’t match some of those bonuses that Brooklyn would have been bound to.

So, why not hold Motiejunas to what became a four-year, $31 million offer sheet once matched? Houston got something in return – a later trigger date on guaranteeing Motiejunas’ 2017-18 salary. Originally, that decision had to be made March 1 – which would’ve meant dropping Motiejunas from the team this season to prevent his salary from counting next season. Now, the Rockets can make that call in July, after this season is complete.

The following two Julys, Houston will also have a choice on guaranteeing Motiejunas’ upcoming salary or dropping him.

Essentially, Motiejunas is signing the most lucrative Hinkie Special in NBA history. If he plays well and stays healthy, the Rockets have Motiejunas at an affordable rate. If he struggles or his back injuries flare up, they can drop him with little to no penalty.

After they backed themselves into this corner, Motiejunas and his agent, B.J. Armstrong, didn’t do so bad. Considering the similarity between this contract and the Nets’ original offer sheet, it seems Houston helped Armstrong save face after a bungled free agency (which is easier to accept when you’re adding a talented reserve to a formidable team).

But for how little is guaranteed and how much control the Rockets hold over the next four years, wouldn’t Motiejunas have been better off accepting the $4,433,683 qualifying offer?

Report: Rockets return Donatas Motiejunas to restricted free agency, working on new contract with him

Donatas Motiejunas, Kenneth Faried
AP Photo/David Zalubowski
Leave a comment

The Rockets had Donatas Motiejunas in a bind.

He was beholden to them on a four-year, $31 million deal and unable to sign with other teams. Motiejunas’ choices: Report for a physical or wait in limbo.

But apparently Houston has allowed him out of that constraint.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

This means Motiejunas can’t sign with the Nets, who signed him to the original offer sheet, for one year.

I bet it also means Motiejunas and Houston have agreed to a new contract. Otherwise, why release him from the offer sheet? The Rockets would be giving up a tremendous amount of leverage out of the goodness of their hearts – unless this is just a prelude to a new deal with Houston.