NBA Draft Preview: Where does Kyle Singler fall?

3 Comments

Kyle Singler is a Duke legend, and that will never change. He is cemented himself as part of the lore of one of the nation’s best college basketball programs. We love him for his trick shots.

But where he fits in the NBA is a much trickier subject. Much more controversial.

In an ideal world he’d a stretch four, a spot up shooter. Problem is he hit just 32.1 percent of his three point shots last season. That’s concerning.

David Thorpe at ESPN and some scouts have kind of lumped him in as a poor man’s Gordon Hayward — smart and can shoot but not athletic enough to create his own shot at the NBA level (Hayward can). It took a while for Hayward but he started to find his NBA niche by the end of the season, Singler may be able to as well.

Rotoworld’s Steve Alexander and ESPN’s Chad Ford have Singler picked in the second round. Over at DraftExpress he is currently pick No. 24 (the Oklahoma City Thunder). His workouts with teams over the next month are going to be key to seeing just where he goes.

At 6’8” he’s got good height for an NBA forward, but he does need to get stronger and put on some muscle (he has done that somewhat but he needs more). His reputation is as a spot-up shooter has taken a hit from what he did from beyond the arc, but also got the reputation as a good midrange shooter and he needs to be more consistent from that area to impact the NBA. Last season he shot just 49.7 percent on two pointers.

He needs to hit those shots because Singler is not athletic by NBA standards and is not going to be a three exploding to the rim for fantastic dunks at the next level. He’s not a great finisher around the rim. He’s not a guy getting to the line all that often. He’s likely going to be a spot up guy who can develop into a good role player — he’s a capable passer and has a good hoops IQ.

How much court time he gets will really depend on defense (and who drafts him). He’s not quick laterally and if he is a three then he will be covering a lot of quick guys. If he can’t, he will sit a lot. It’s that simple.

But you could see him becoming sort of a Peja Stojakovic type (the current version, not the Sacramento version) if he can become a consistent outside shooter at the NBA level. A guy who can come in off the bench and knock down shots and give you a boost.

In this draft, that might have him picked near the end of the first round, although second round is a distinct possibility. It’s all going to come down to the workouts.

Vlade Divac: Kings would have drafted De’Aaron Fox No. 1

AP Photo/Frank Franklin II
1 Comment

I sense a pattern.

Like Celtics president Danny Ainge saying Boston would’ve drafted No. 3 pick Jayson Tatum No. 1 if it kept the top pick, Kings president Vlade Divac said Sacramento would’ve taken No. 5 pick De'Aaron Fox No. 1 if it had the top pick.

Divac, via James Ham of NBC Sports California:

“Screaming,” Divac said about the reaction in the room to Fox falling in their lap. “It was a guy that we all loved and in some way, if we had the number 1 pick, he would’ve been our guy.”
“De’Aaron is our future,” Divac added.

The Kings are getting a lot of credit for drafting well. Maybe it’s a good thing they didn’t get the No. 1 pick, because it would have been foolish to pass on Markelle Fultz and Lonzo Ball (and others) for Fox. (The real punchline: Sacramento couldn’t have won the lottery due to Divac’s dumb salary dump with the 76ers giving Philadelphia the ability to swap picks.)

I don’t believe the Kings would’ve actually taken Fox No. 1. This sounds like Divac embellishing, which can be no big deal. It also puts outsized expectations on Fox, for better or worse.

Danny Ainge: Celtics would have drafted Jayson Tatum No. 1

2 Comments

After trading down from No. 1 to No. 3 in the draft, Celtics president Danny Ainge said Boston would probably still get the player it would’ve picked No. 1.

The Celtics selected Jayson Tatum No. 3. Would they have taken him if they held the No. 1 pick?

Ainge, via CSN New England:

Yes, we would have picked him with the first pick. But the draft was very even, we felt, at the top all the way through maybe five or six. And it was very difficult. There was a lot of players we liked in this draft.

I believe that the Celtics saw the top several picks as similar. I also believe, but don’t know, that they would’ve drafted Markelle Fultz if they kept the top pick.

I’m also curious, considering how the process unfolded, whether Ainge had Tatum or Josh Jackson in mind when making his initial statement. Regardless of whether he was thinking Jackson, Tatum or both, Ainge couldn’t reasonably back out of his claim now.

For what it’s worth, I would have seen Jackson (No. 3 on my board) as a reach at No. 1. I see Taytum (No. 9 on my board) as a reach at No. 3, let alone No. 1.

Warriors break record by paying $3.5 million for draft rights to Jordan Bell

Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
1 Comment

The Thunder paid the Hawks $3 million for the draft rights to No. 31 pick Tibor Pleiss in 2010. Last year, the Nets paid $3 million just to move up 13 spots in the second round to get Isaiah Whitehead.

The Warriors surpassed that amount, previously the record for spending on a draft pick, to buy the No. 38 pick from the Bulls and get Jordan Bell last night.

Marcus Thompson of The Mercury News:

Golden State also bought the No. 38 pick last year to get a player I rated as first-round caliber, Patrick McCaw, whose rights cost “just” $2.4 million. McCaw had a promising rookie year and even contributed in the NBA Finals.

Bell – whose draft rights drew the maximum-allowable $3.5 million – could achieve similar success. I rated him No. 31 but in the same tier as other first-round-caliber prospects. He’s a versatile defender, capable of protecting the rim and switching onto guards. He’s obviously not nearly the same level, but Bell is in the Draymond Green mold defensively. Bell’s offense doesn’t come close to Green’s, though. Bell could fill a role sooner than later when Golden State needs a defensive-minded sub.

The Warriors have generated massive revenue during their dominant run the last few years. Now, they’re putting some of that money back into the on-court product. Success breeds success – especially when the owners don’t just pocket the profits.

Markelle Fultz was ‘"Excited to head to (City) and join the (team name)’

AP Photo/Frank Franklin II
Leave a comment

The 76ers drafted Markelle Fultz No. 1 overall, placing a ton of attention on the point guard.

He parlayed that attention into a sponsored Instagram post, but he – or whomever posted on his behalf – never changed the stock text the company sent.

Rodger Sherman of The Ringer:

Fultz deleted and reposted, but this was probably a blessing in disguise. If it weren’t for the funny initial oversight, the advertisement never would have gotten so much traction.