Lakers to hire Mike Brown to be coach

24 Comments

UPDATE #3 9:55 am: By the morning, pretty much everyone with an NBA source has confirmed this. The Lakers are going to make an offer to Mike Brown, maybe for three, maybe for four years. The only potential catch is that it is not really going to be a negotiation, if he doesn’t take the offer the Lakers will move on to Rick Adelman.

UPDATE #2, 1:11 am: Mike Brown has pulled himself out of the running for the Golden State Warriors job because he is about to be hired by the Los Angeles Lakers, according to Matt Steinmetz of CSN Bay Area. He quotes several league sources as saying that Brown will be named as the Lakers coach.

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo adds that the two sides may have worked out the money issue, with Brown getting a four-year deal at more than $4 million per year.

It appears this will become official later on Wednesday.

UPDATE May 25, 12:23 am: Money is the issue holding everything up, according to David Aldridge of NBA.com, who says that Rick Adelman is still in the running due to money.

As PBT told you on Tuesday, the Lakers are holding firm on salary and will not go above $5 million a season. Brown wants to make more in the Doc Rivers range of $7 million a season, Aldridge reports. If he will not agree to the lower salary, the Lakers will move on.

While the Lakers have spent big on coaching during the Phil Jackson era, prior to that Buss was known for trying not to pay much for coaches. Remember he pulled Pat Riley out of the broadcast booth, in part because he would not have cost as much as some veteran coaches.

May 24, 11:17 pm: Mike Brown, the former Cleveland Cavaliers coach during much of their LeBron James era, may be the coach Lakers owner Jerry Buss was talking about when he said they were close to signing a new coach.

Brown and the Lakers are in serious talks, according to Marc Spears and Adrian Wojnarowski at Yahoo. As in the deal could be reached in the next 24-48 hours serious, the report says. Not finalized but this seems to be the direction things are going.

Brown is edging out current Lakers assistant Brian Shaw and veteran coach Rick Adelman to replace the legendary Phil Jackson.

That scream you just heard was from terrified Lakers fans.

But they shouldn’t be as scared as they are. First off, Brown is a defense-first coach who got his Cavs teams to play well on that end of the floor. That has always been the key for the Lakers with this roster, how well they played defense. And Brown won more than 60 games as a coach.

But that was not the knock on Brown, it was his offense. Which was always very LeBron James focused, with a lot of isolations for him. It looked stagnant. Thing is, what did you expect him to do? Did you see this season what they had around James? For a long time Brown’s starting backcourt was Eric Snow and Larry Hughes, so yes, he gave the ball to James a lot as a point forward. Even when he had Mo Williams and Delonte West are you going to take the ball out of LeBron’s hands? The Cavs often had the best offense in the league with that latter twosome. And those guys are not exactly all that.

The issue at hand is they are going from a system to a playbook. From a system designed to react to what the defense wants to a more rigid system where the players have less freedom to attack what the defense gives them.

Then there is the respect issue — will Kobe Bryant respect a guy who has not been through the wars and have the titles that these Lakers have. That Shaw has. Even Adelman has had great teams that might have had rings had it not been for Kobe and the Lakers.

Buss said he was not going to consult a player on the hiring of a coach (which is not the tradition, the issue is usually discussed with superstars like Kobe). But Brown seems to be the direction they are going.

Jazz deny rumored promise to draft D.J. Wilson

Joe Robbins/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Michigan forward D.J. Wilson said he’d stay in the draft only if he’d go in the first round. Yet, despite not doing any on-court work at the combine, the borderline first-rounder remained in the draft beyond the withdrawal deadline.

What gives?

Rod Beard of The Detroit News:

Kyle Goon of The Salt Lake Tribune:

NBA teams sometimes promise to draft a player. They never reveal that before the draft. So, Utah’s denial doesn’t mean much – even if it’s true.

The Jazz were the last team to give Wilson a full work out before he injured himself in a Spurs workout. So, this rumor could be based on circumstantial evidence rather than leak of a Utah guarantee.

Wilson would make sense for the Jazz, who could see their payroll bloat if they re-sign Gordon Hayward and George Hill (and maybe even Joe Ingles). They could move Derrick Favors, an interior who doesn’t exactly fit with Rudy Gobert. Wilson would give Utah another option with Trey Lyles as developing stretch fours behind Boris Diaw. (Utah could even move Diaw and count on Lyles/Wilson to emerge sooner than later.)

Watch LeBron James’ top highlight from each of his postseason appearances (video)

AP Photo/Ron Schwane
Leave a comment

LeBron James and Tony Parker are the only players to play in the last dozen postseasons.

(If you’re wondering, Manu Ginobili missed the 2009 playoffs due to an ankle injury.)

It’s fair to say LeBron was a bit more spectacular than Parker in that span. As LeBron enters his seventh straight Finals, the NBA released this awesome video showing LeBron’s best playoff highlight from each year:

There’s no entry for this year. Here’s betting it comes against the Warriors in the NBA Finals.

David Stern: We thought we could re-work Chris Paul-to-Lakers trade until Mitch Kupchak ‘panicked’

AP Photo/Kathy Willens
2 Comments

NBA commissioner David Stern – acting as New Orleans’ owner representative, he says – infamously vetoed a potential Chris Paul-to-Lakers trade in 2011.

But that didn’t close the possibility of Paul going to the Lakers.

The New Orleans Hornets (now the Pelicans and not be confused with the current Charlotte Hornets), Lakers and Rockets tried to rework the three-team trade that would’ve sent Paul to the Lakers, Pau Gasol to Houston and Lamar Odom, Kevin Martin, Luis Scola, Goran Dragic and a first-round pick to New Orleans. But talks fell apart around the time the Lakers dealt Odom to the Mavericks.

Stern on Nunyo & Company (hat tip: Harrison Feigen of Silver Screen & Roll):

In fact, in the course of the weekend, we thought we could re-do the deal. We really thought that Houston would be ready to part with Kevin Lowry, and we had a trade lined up for Odom that would have gotten us a good first-round draft pick – not we, but my basketball folks. But Mitch Kupchak at the time panicked and moved Odom to Dallas. So the piece wasn’t even there for us to play with at the time. So that was it — just about what was good for the then-New Orleans Hornets.

Remember, Stern – roundly criticized for his handling of this episode* – has blamed the Lakers and Rockets for the lingering perception. This could just be him again trying to shift responsibility.

*Somewhat fairly, somewhat not. Owners veto general manager-approved trades often enough, and Stern was acting as New Orleans’ owner after George Shinn sold the franchise back to the league. But Stern had an agenda as commissioner. He never should have assumed such a large conflict of interest. What he did with the Paul trade was reasonable for an acting owner, but because Stern was also commissioner, it’s fair to question how much New Orleans’ interests and how much the league’s interests factored into the decision-making.

But let’s take Stern at his word – that he and the Hornets thought they could re-do the trade and send Paul to the Lakers. That doesn’t mean they were right. Maybe the Lakers and Rockets (who had Kyle Lowry, not the “Kevin Lowry” Stern named) were never going to part with enough to get Stern’s approval.

And maybe New Orleans didn’t properly convey its interest in still completing a deal. Perhaps, Kupchak acted reasonably by trading Odom to Dallas – for a first-round pick, a deal Mark Cuban would ultimately regret – rather than wait around for the Hornets, who eventually sent Paul to the Clippers.

It’s easy to blame Kupchak, but he might tell a different story.

Isaiah Thomas makes it clear he wants to stay in Boston

3 Comments

It’s been a long time since there was so much discussion about whether a team needs to trade or just let go of an All-NBA and All-Star player at his peak who is clear and away a fan favorite.

Yet that’s where the Boston Celtics and Isaiah Thomas find themselves. After landing the No. 1 pick in this year’s draft — where they will almost certainly take point guard Markelle Fultz — and with the Celtics looking a full couple steps behind the Cavaliers in the playoffs, the question about whether Thomas is part of the future in Boston has come up. He is a free agent in 2018 and are the Celtics willing to pay the big money it will take to keep him?

Know this, Thomas wants to remain a Celtic and win a Celtic. You can listen to his full comments above, but Gary Washburn of the Boston Globe has the money quote:

Outside of chasing Gordon Hayward, this summer the Celtics are going to focus on getter some frontcourt help, someone to help with rebounding and rim protection. They will look to get better, but Danny Ainge isn’t going to push all his chips into the middle of the table to make a gambit on immediate massive improvement. He will remain patient, building this team so that in three years and five years they will be a force in the East.

And the Thomas discussion likely gets put on hold for a year (unless there is a change of course and contract extension talks come up, but that’s only if Boston misses on Hayward and any other big targets).