Cleveland Cavaliers v Phoenix Suns

Byron Scott, J.J. Hickson have clear the air meeting

Leave a comment

It was going to be an ugly year in Cleveland, we all knew that. Even Dan Gilbert knew that, whether he would admit it or not (even to himself).

One of the expected silver linings was going to be the growth and emergence of J.J. Hickson, who was going to finally get plenty of chances and… regress?

Hickson’s shooting has fallen from 55.4 percent last season to 45.1 percent this season. He is getting more minutes and chances but has become considerably less efficient. Defenses started to pay attention to him (now that LeBron was not drawing all the focus). That and he started trusting his weak jump shot from distance — just like last season he hits about 29 percent of his shots beyond 16 feet (27 percent last year) but now he takes 2.5 a game rather than just one like last season.

Cavs coach Byron Scot has questioned Hickson’s effort and eventually took him out of the starting lineup. Hickson maintained he was doing what Scott asked and at one point questioned why Scott would blame the bench for the team’s problems.

At one point this week, Hickson and Scot talked it out, according to the Akron Beacon Journal. We have no idea what was said — although the smart money says Scott did most of the talking — but it seems to have worked.

”It’s no secret our relationship hasn’t been the best,” Hickson said. ”But as a young player, it’s up to me to be humbled by the whole situation and listen to him. He played in the league for a long time. Who am I to question his actions?…”

”My main goal is to win basketball games. To do that, I think I need to be on the floor,” Hickson said. ”But to be on the floor, I need to do the things [Scott] asks me to do.”

Hickson admitted that everything this season has taken a toll on his confidence. Combine that with the usual ups and downs seen with young players (this is Hickson’s third year in the league) and you have a player Scott felt he couldn’t trust to help win games. Scott wanted defense and rebounding first out of Hickson then let the points come where they may, but that can be hard for young players to grasp and execute

Maybe Hickson is starting turn that corner. Maybe he is getting it. Maybe. He looked good in dropping 21 on the Bulls, but followed that up with a rough outing in Dallas. But at least Hickson seems now to really understanding what Scott is asking of him.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?