DeMarcus Cousins, Paul Westphal

How DeMarcus Cousins is securing Paul Westphal’s job


There are problems with the Sacramento Kings — they are not good and seem to be getting worse. They are a terrible shooting team that has the fourth worst offense in the NBA despite having Tyreke Evans in it. Their defense isn’t much better — and it’s all slipping, they are 1-9 in their last 10.

Often, this is when the coach starts to feel his seat get hot. For Paul Westphal is should be a seat of flame right now.

Except, he’s likely not going anywhere for two key reasons, Tom Ziller wisely points out at his brilliant Sactown Royalty.

DeMarcus Cousins is one of them.

Monday Westphal threw Cousins out of practice, this coming after fines and other disciplinary measures. The Kings drafted the talented Cousins No. 5 overall and dismissed others concerns about his attitude and work ethic. The Kings started to make Cousins a key part of their marketing campaign. But so far this season Cousins has not impressed on the court and has appeared to be a challenge off it. A challenge Westphal has had to stand up to.

And as Ziller points out, this puts Kings management in a difficult spot.

And there’s the hard place: if the Kings fire Westphal once it’s widely known he severely clashes with Cousins, the decision can do nothing but embolden Bad Cousins, which is the worst thing possible for the kid’s career. That may seem like Around the Horn-like overblown commentary, but really: what we know about Cousins shows that he takes a foot when offered an inch. From shot selection to these dealings with the coaches — he’s not shy about throwing his weight around, right? Vanquishing a coach Cousins clashes with won’t do anything to help tamp down Cousins’ ego.

The other issue with getting rid of Westphal is money. Of course it is; it is always about money. Sam Amick of FanHouse points out — after noting that players are grumbling about Westphal — that the Maloofs picked up a full season, $2 million contract with their coach. Fire him now and you still have to pay the $2 million, and only Donald Sterling would try to get out of that (and fail). That may not seem like a lot of money compared to the contracts the Kings are paying out, but for a cash-strapped team in a small market that is big bank to pay out for nothing.

If enough players complain about Westphal — specifically Evans — then the Kings may let their coach go anyway. But they need very, very good reasons now because they want to make sure Cousins knows it’s not about him.

So for now, the song remains the same in Sacramento. And Westphal has his job.

Report: Some Hawks executives doubt Danny Ferry’s contrition

Danny Ferry, Mike Budenholzer
Leave a comment

Since his racist comments about Luol Deng, Danny Ferry has mostly avoided the public eye.

He apologized through a couple statements released around the beginning of his leave of absence. He met with black community leaders. He claimed “full responsibility.”

A cadre of NBA people vouched for him. A law firm the Hawks hired to investigate themselves essentially cleared of him of being motivated by racial bias.

But there’s another side.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

Ferry’s efforts at contrition sometimes fell short to some inside the organization. Several Hawks executives were at times put off by Ferry’s behavior during a compulsory two-day sensitive training session, especially since they considered his actions triggered the assembly in the first place. He came across as inattentive and dismissive of the exercise, some said, and fiddled with his phone quite a bit. Ferry contends he was taking notes on the meeting.

“It was awkward for everyone because I had not seen or been around Hawks employees for three months,” Ferry told ESPN this summer about the sensitivity training. “I took the seminar seriously, participated in the role-play exercises and certainly learned from the two-day session.”

the Hawks satisfied Ferry on June 22 by releasing both the written Taylor report and a flowery press release in which Hawks CEO Koonin was quoted saying, among other things, that “Danny Ferry is not a racist.” Some Hawks executives grumbled that the team overreached in exonerating Ferry, but doing so — not to mention paying Ferry significantly more than the $9 million he was owed on his “golden ticket” deal — was the cost of moving on.

I don’t know whether Ferry has shown the proper level of contrition, whether he was playing on his phone or taking notes.

But I know what he said:

“He’s a good guy overall, but he’s got some African in him, and I don’t say that in a bad way other than he’s a guy that may be making side deals behind you, if that makes sense. He has a storefront out front that’s beautiful and great, but he may be selling some counterfeit stuff behind you.”

He was not reading directly from a scouting report. He did not stop when his paraphrasing repeated a racist trope.

That’s a problem.

I don’t think Ferry intended to say something racist – but he did.

It’s a fixable issue, though. Through introspection and a desire to change, he can learn from this mistake. Maybe he already has.

That some around him don’t think he took that process seriously is worth noting. They might be off base, and Ferry obviously disagrees with their perception. But this is a two-sided story despite the common narrative focusing on Ferry’s redemption.

It’ll be up to any potential future employers to sort through the discrepancies.

Gilbert Arenas: Caron Butler’s version of gun incident ‘false’

arenas wizards
1 Comment

Caron Butler recently detailed the Gilbert Arenas-Javaris Crittenton gun incident.

In a since-deleted – but screenshot-captured – Instagram post, Arenas gives his description:

The biggest differences between Butler’s and Arenas’ versions:

1. Arenas claims he wasn’t the one who owed Crittenton money, that the feud escalated over Arenas prematurely showing his hand during a card game.

2. Arenas says he told Crittenton to pick a gun to shoot Arenas with – not to pick a gun he’d get shot by Arenas with.