Team USA vs. Lithuania: 5 Things to Watch

Leave a comment

Team USA continues its exhibition schedule against international competition in advance of the FIBA World Championship today with a game against Lithuania. It’s an opportunity for USA to test their progress against a better team than the China squad they faced last weekend. Lithuania’s team may be made up primarily of second-tier players (like Team USA, oddly enough), but Linas Kleiza has the Lithuanians in a position to make a run. It’s a good matchup, with most of their strength on the wing and not down low. Here are five things to watch for in today’s exhibition.

1. So About Those Guards: Well, we know the remaining won’t be coming from the bigs, but USA’s got a glut of guards. Eric Gordon’s likely on the bubble, but he’s at least a pure shooter versus the obscene number of point guards being carried on the roster currently. Russell Westbrook is the other candidate, but more important than the final cut, honestly, is how the guards work together. Determining who’s best for managing the offense and who should work off-ball is a trick Coach K has to figure out. It’s just not as simple as “toss ’em out there and let ’em play.”

2. Tread Lightly, Tyson: No one really wants to criticize Coach K’s decisions, because, well, it’s Coach K. Beyond his endless accomplishments, he also won the Gold two years ago. But I mean, Tyson Chandler? That’s your center? That’s the hill you want to die on? The guy that’s missed 68 games the past two seasons and has a bum foot? Chandler is the only true center on the team, and while Kevin Love will surely help out with the rebounding, Coach K has been experimenting with things like Kevin Durant at center. Which is cute, and nice, but also a really bad idea in actual basketball terms. Chandler simultaneously has to be out there for the team to maintain rebounding advantage and not wear down the other players playing bigger than their size, and has to be careful because he absolutely cannot get hurt.

3. What’s Good, Iggy?: Andre Iguodala has impressed the coaches and fans alike with his play, being the versatile guy he is on the Sixers. He’s in his comfort zone on this squad, and has taken on a leadership role on the court. The coaches will be looking for more of that from Iguodala. The coaches clearly want to see more aggressiveness from the players, and Iguodala has been the model of that. It’ll be interesting to see if he continues that theme against a better team defensively in Lithuania, especially since he may be guarding star Linas Kleiza for some time.

4. Go Get It Durant: If Iguodala has been the model of assertiveness, Durant has been the opposite. It hasn’t been concerning, because he’s mostly been helping get teammates involved and has still been the primary scorer. But the feeling has been that Kevin Durant has held something back during the exhibitions and practice so far and is still trying to get his feet under him. The coaches have stressed the need for him to feel comfortable scoring and being who he is, the best player on the team. Today offers him a prime chance to take over and do what he does best. Get buckets.

5. Downtown Work: The key to this FIBA run will be three-point shooting, the experts have agreed. While NBA fans wonder how in heaven’s name this team will consistently rebound, the experts have been focused on the team nailing, and defending, three-point shots. There are some ace defenders on the perimeter for Team USA, but the pull-up and spit-shot threes of FIBA are a different level and approach from what they’re used to in the NBA. Likewise, this is not known as a crack three-point shooting team. The best shooters may be at the wing spots, and Rondo and Derrick Rose are simply not terrific perimeter scorers, though Rose has clearly worked on his shot. Eric Gordon could cement himself on the team after a strong week of practice with a strong shooting performance from downtown today.

Report: Magic’s search firm inquiring about Larry Bird

AP Photo/Michael Conroy
Leave a comment

Larry Bird resigned as Pacers president.

Not just today, but also in 2012. A year later, he was again running a front office (Indiana’s).

Could he make an even quicker leap back into NBA team presidency – with the Magic?

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports:

This strikes me as more as Orlando’s search firm trying to prove its usefulness than a viable option.

Whether they’re trying to generate excitement, getting used for leverage or actually serious, the Magic keep getting linked to big-name replacements for the fired Rob HenniganDoc Rivers, David Griffin and now Bird. If the Magic are willing to pay major money for name recognition, they could get plenty of people to at least listen. But I’m unconvinced about that spending.

It’d be a little weird for Bird to inherit Frank Vogel, whom Bird fired as the Pacers’ coach. But Bird did everything he could to show that was more about seeking change than losing faith in Vogel.

Report: Larry Bird stepping down as Pacers president

AP Photo/Darron Cummings
1 Comment

Larry Bird put his stamp on the Pacers in the last year –  firing Frank Vogel and trading for Jeff Teague and Thaddeus Young to join hand-picked Monta Ellis and Myles Turner as Paul George‘s supporting cast on an up-tempo, offensively dynamic team.

The plan fell flat.

Indiana played at a below-average pace and produced a middling offense. The Pacers got swept by the Cavaliers in the first round of the playoffs.

Now, Indiana’s uncertain future – with Paul George a year from free agency and the Lakers courting – gets even more chaotic.

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports:

Bird had already resigned once as Pacers president, in 2012. He returned the following year.

Bird’s patience and pain tolerance for the job due to lingering back issues from his playing days has long seemed to waver. I wouldn’t write him off for good.

Indiana promoted Kevin Pritchard in 2012, when Bird previously stepped down. Pritchard previously worked as the Trail Blazers’ general manager, and he’s a qualified replacement.

The work begins immediately with a decision on George. If he doesn’t make an All-NBA team, the Pacers won’t gain as much financial advantage in his contract offer. That could open the door to a trade and rebuilding around Turner — or making a last-ditch push to convince George he can win in Indiana.

Report: Clippers expect Chris Paul to re-sign

chris paul
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Chris Paul reportedly verbally committed months ago to re-sign with the Clippers. There have been mixed signals about Blake Griffin‘s intention to re-sign.

But they can’t formalize the deals until July, and the Clippers are now one game from another demoralizing first-round exit.

Where do they stand now?

Kevin Arnovitz of ESPN:

Sources close to the Clippers say that they expect Paul to re-sign with the Clippers. He’ll be eligible for a five-year contract in excess of $200 million. Griffin’s return is less certain, sources say. This summer is his first foray into unrestricted free agency. Given his snakebitten tenure with the team and the possibility of another early exit, the prospect of exploring what’s out there will be alluring. One premise volunteered in good humor suggests that Paul is more likely to take a slew of meetings in a public process but ultimately re-sign with the Clippers, while Griffin is more likely to mull the decision privately under the guise of night, but announce he’ll be playing elsewhere in 2017-18.

Clippers president/coach Doc Rivers has made clear his desire to re-sign Paul and Griffin, and the playoffs won’t change that. This is the right call. It’s so difficult to assemble a team this good, the Clippers shouldn’t throw it away for the sake of change. Just because the Clippers haven’t gotten the breaks in previous seasons doesn’t mean they won’t get the breaks in future seasons.

But Paul and Griffin – and J.J. Redick, who’ll also be an unrestricted free agent – will determine the franchise’s fate. If they want to leave, they’ll leave.

Can the Clippers lure them back? They apparently think they’ll keep Paul, but there’s an uncertain dynamic in L.A. that Arnovitz explores in great depth. I highly recommend reading his full piece.

Nike, Adidas, Under Armour pass on potential No. 1 pick Lonzo Ball

AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill
10 Comments

NBA teams reportedly aren’t dinging potential No. 1 pick Lonzo Ball over all the wild stuff his dad says and does.

Shoe companies are apparently taking a different approach.

Darren Rovell of ESPN:

An endorsement deal with Nike, Under Armour or Adidas is not in the cards for Lonzo Ball.

Ball’s father LaVar confirmed that the three shoe and apparel companies informed him that they were not interested in doing a deal with his son. Sources with the three companies told ESPN.com that they indeed were moving on.

In his meetings with the three, LaVar insisted that the company license his upstart Big Baller Brand from him. He also showed the companies a shoe prototype that he hoped would be Lonzo’s first shoe.

“We’ve said from the beginning, we aren’t looking for an endorsement deal,” LaVar told ESPN. “We’re looking for co-branding, a true partner. But they’re not ready for that because they’re not used to that model. But hey, the taxi industry wasn’t ready for Uber, either.”

“Just imagine how rich Tiger (Woods), Kobe (Bryant), Serena (Williams), (Michael) Jordan and LeBron (James) would have been if they dared to do their own thing,” LaVar said. “No one owned their own brand before they turned pro. We do and I have three sons so it’s that much more valuable.”

Is there more upside in this approach? Yeah, I guess.

But the traditional shoe companies bring valuable infrastructure and experience. There’s value in forfeiting upside for those resources. Lonzo Ball, who has yet to play in the NBA, is also missing out on guaranteed life-changing money.

On the risk-reward curve, this seems like a mistake.